Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

 

Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader? Perhaps you are already in a supervisory role, but as has been discussed previously, appointment does not guarantee leadership skills.

How can you evaluate your own leadership skills and behaviors? You can start by analyzing your performance in specific areas of leadership. In this Discussion, you will complete Gallup’s StrengthsFinder assessment. This assessment will identify your personal strengths, which have been shown to improve motivation, engagement, and academic self-conference. Through this assessment, you will discover your top five themes—which you can reflect upon and use to leverage your talents for optimal success and examine how the results relate to your leadership traits.Leaders should show high interest in others by listening to them in an open-minded way
and accept criticism to develop corrective actions to improve on their leadership style. Lastly, the
leaders should have restorative capability, especially in healthcare management (Asamani et al.,
2016). Restorative talents ensure that a leader does not surrender when issues arise, but instead
uses evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions and intuition to create innovative solutions to
address the challenges. Health care leaders who deploy restorative talents create plans that
support restorative care that include offering holistic care for patient to attain highest levels of
functionality and autonomy.

NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

To Prepare:

Complete the StrengthsFinder assessment instrument, per the instructions found in this Module’s Learning Resources.

Please Note: This Assessment will take roughly 30 minutes to complete.

  • Once you have completed your assessment, you will receive your “Top 5 Signature Themes of Talent” on your screen.
  • Click the Download button below Signature Theme Report, and then print and save the report. We also encourage you to select the Apply tab to review action items.

NOTE: Please keep your report. You will need your results for future courses. Technical Issues with Gallup:

If you have technical issues after registering, please contact the Gallup Education Support group by phone at +1.866-346-4408. Support is available 24 hours/day from 6:00 p.m. Sunday U.S. Central Time through 5:00 p.m. Friday U.S. Central Time.

  • Reflect on the results of your Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.
  • Download your Signature Theme Report to submit for this Discussion.

By Day 3 of Week 5

Post a brief description of your results from the StrengthsFinder assessment. Then, briefly describe two core values, two strengths, and two characteristics that you would like to strengthen based on the results of your StrengthsFinder assessment. Be specific. Note: Be sure to attach your Signature Theme Report to your Discussion post.

By Day 6 of Week 5

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by making recommendations for how they might strengthen the leadership behaviors profiled in their StrengthsFinder assessment, or by commenting on lessons to be learned from the results that can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

I have completed the Gallup Clifton Strengths in a previous leadership role. The report attached is from my November 2019 survey.

NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

My top 5 signature themes are Achiever, Responsibility, Restorative, Input, and Strategic. According to Gallup, these themes represent my top 5 talents and are my dominant traits as a leader (Gallup, 2019).

According to my Signature Theme Report, my Achiever theme means that I am a person who feels the need to accomplish something tangible every day (Gallup, 2019). This theme identifies my innate drive for accomplishments and fits me with great accuracy. The Achiever theme means I rarely rest on my laurels, relish challenges, and have a great deal of energy and drive.

My second theme was identified as responsibility, and this also fits me accurately. According to Gallup, this theme means that I take ownership of anything I commit myself to, and that this is the reason I always complete projects or tasks (Gallup, 2019). Conscientious adherence to ethics and a drive for completing tasks the right way defines this trait (Gallup, 2019). My report says that this theme creates my reputation for being someone that can be counted on to get things done (Gallup, 2019).

My third theme of Restorative means that I enjoy solving problems (Gallup, 2019). According to Gallup, I am energized by challenges, and this theme embodies that trait (p. 3). The Restorative theme identifies me as a person who enjoys restoring things by identifying underlying problems and resolving them (Gallup, 2019). It identifies me as a fixer (Gallup, 2019).

Theme four in my report was identified as Input. Gallup says this theme represents my innate curiosity and inquisitiveness (Gallup, 2019). I believe that this theme is directly correlated to my earlier themes and is foundational to my energy and drive. According to my report, my Input theme means that I find the world complex and fascinating (Gallup, 2019). My Input theme means I collect things that fascinate me (Gallup, 2019).

My fifth theme, Strategic, is described as a skill that cannot be taught (Gallup, 2019). I believe this is reflected in my ability to think critically. Gallup says this theme allows me, “…to see patterns where others simply see complexity” (p. 4). According to Gallup, this theme also helps me to arrive at decisions rapidly to move forward into solutions (Gallup, 2019).

It was quite easy for me to see how these themes reflect my personal values and the characteristics of myself that I take pride in manifesting. I feel that some of these characteristics are my greatest strengths. However, it has been my experience that my greatest strengths are also my greatest weaknesses.

Two of my core values that are clearly represented in my results are responsibility and helping. I feel strongly about commitment, whether that is to a relationship, a job, a friend, a pet, or a project. I take responsibility for whatever I commit to and feel a strong sense of pride about this. I feel significant distress when I feel I have let anyone down. My value of being helpful is directly related to this and ultimately is what drove me to the profession of nursing. I feel a strong drive to be helpful, and feel an obligation to share my energy, motivation, and knowledge to help others. Broome & Marshall state that motivation inspires others in an organization (p. 185). I aspire to be a transformational leader. In one cross-sectional study published in the International Journal of Caring Sciences, the transformational leadership style of inspirational motivation was able to increase the quality of nursing work life by 28% (Suratno et al., 2018).

Two strengths that this report identified are my strong critical thinking skills, and my innate inquisitiveness. These strengths combine to make me a problem solver. I naturally look for solutions. I am able to strategize, prioritize, and take action to resolve problems.

Characteristics that I would like to strengthen based upon my results fall within my themes of Responsibility and Achiever. But it is not strengthening these traits that I think I need to work on. Rather, I need to be better about recognizing when these drives override my ability to say no when there are too many demands on my time. I am not always good at saying no. My drive to achieve goals and my strong sense of responsibility for things contribute to this. I would like to focus on setting achievable goals and setting clear boundaries that are best for me and my wellbeing. I want to always demonstrate good boundaries. I want to learn to recognize that I do not have to set myself on fire to keep others warm so to speak. I want to embody and model my value of wholeness through self-care.

The most productive people I have known are good at prioritizing and setting boundaries. This enables them to focus on the things and projects that matter the most to them. They accomplish more and feel better about themselves because they act in congruence with their values. To always make choices that are congruent with my priorities and values is important to me, and sometimes saying no is necessary. I want to learn not to let my sense of responsibility and constant drive to achieve influence my choices when it comes to focusing on my priorities. I want to be better about learning when to say no rather than always saying yes.

References

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Gallup. (November 27, 2019). Darcy ruffo. Your signature theme report [Report]. Clifton Strengths, 63012165 (DARCY RUFFO).

Suratno, K., Ariyanti, S., & Kadar, K. S. (2018). The Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Quality of Nursing Work Life in Hospital. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(3), 1416–1422.

Bottom of Form

 Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURA 6053 Discussion Your Leadership Profile

Grading Rubric Guidelines DQ

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.