NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Sample Answer for NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Included After Question
Assessment Description
In this assignment, you will write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies.
For this assignment, use the nursing practice problem and two qualitative peer-reviewed research articles you identified in Topic 1 (or two new articles based on instructor feedback in Topic 1). In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, summarize two qualitative studies.
Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part I” document to organize your essay.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Lopes Write. A link to the Lopes Write technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Title: NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
The use of a novel generation of interactive patient engagement systems leveraging virtual health coaches powered by artificial intelligence can assist health facilities and systems address the rising shortage of nurses. Through these interactive technologies, nurses can spend more time with patients and elevate their roles in improving care management and coordination. The increasing deployment of telehealth technology in different care facilities is considered as one of the critical aspects of addressing the nursing shortage problem. Qualitative studies show that healthcare facilities can leverage telehealth to address the nursing shortage. The purpose of this assignment is to provide a summary of two qualitative studies on using telehealth to address the nursing shortage problem. The paper also discusses the use of the findings in nursing practice, and addresses ethical considerations related to their conduct.
Background to the Studies
The identified studies include Barbosa and Da Silva’s (2017) article on nursing by telehealth and Bashir and Bastola’s (2018) article on nurses’ perspectives towards telehealth based on efficacy and quality of health care.
Problem
The problem under investigation in both articles is use of telehealth in nursing to enhance accessibility and improve the quality of services offered. In their study, Barbosa et al. (2017) focus on nurses’ perception concerning interpersonal communication in care provision using telehealth. Bashir et al. (2018) consider telehealth as an innovative model in health care delivery for nurses to effectively manage patients; especially those with chronic diseases away from healthcare facilities. These studies all demonstrate the acute problem of nursing shortage that healthcare industry faces. Different studies have explored the use of telehealth and telemedicine as effective interventions to address the spiraling nursing shortage problem. In his article, Neville (2018) discusses how leveraging telehealth can improve accessibility, reduce the perennial nursing shortage and improve quality of care. Further, Garajawala and Pelkowski (2021) assert that telehealth offers benefits like minimizing the costs of care and improving patient satisfaction and
quality. Imperatively, the articles under critical analysis demonstrate the need to integrate telehealth to help mitigate the acute nursing shortage.
Significance of the Studies
The two studies offer critical benefits to stakeholders on how they can address the nursing shortage problem while cutting costs, increasing access to and improving quality of care. The studies show that telehealth allows nurses to enhance engagement and interactions with patients; leading to shared decision-making and patient-centric care interventions.
Purpose, Objectives & Research Questions
The article by Barbosa and Da Silva’s aim is to evaluate nurses’ perception concerning interpersonal communication while providing care using telehealth. The article by Bashir et al. (2018) examines if telehealth technology affects the perceived degree of internal service quality offered by nurses in a telehealth setting. The research empirically tests and validates the notion of telehealth nursing service quality (TNSQ). The research questions in both studies focus on the significance of telehealth in nursing; especially on enhancing quality care and helping stakeholders to address the nursing shortage problem through innovative care provision. What is the perception of nurses on interpersonal communication when providing care through telehealth? Does telehealth technology impact the perceived degree of internal service quality offered by nurses within a telehealth environment or organization?
Implications of the Two Studies in Nursing
The two studies have significant impact on nursing practice, especially efforts to address the nursing shortage issue as they offer innovative solution through deployment of telehealth. Studies and government indices show that the country will experience a shortage of registered nurses which is projected to intensify as the baby boomers’ generation ages, retires, and demands for more health care services. The increasing number of patients with chronic disease, the increased expansion of care due to health insurance reforms, and changes in scope of practice and authority for nurses imply that more healthcare providers will be required. Therefore, these articles present evidence that healthcare practitioners and organizations can leverage to mitigate the nursing shortage problem.
The findings from the two articles shows that more organizations can use telehealth nursing as a remedy for the current and projected shortage. These articles also demonstrate the need for nursing leaders to develop innovative solutions focused on care expansion and increased participation of patients and their families. The implication is that nursing shortage requires evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to tackle it for long-term outcomes.
Method of Study
The article by Barbosa et al. (2017) uses qualitative research based on a questionnaire with open-ended question. The authors them use content analysis in identifying the overriding themes in the study. The theoretical framework is descriptive analysis as the investigators interviewed healthcare providers working in telehealth in Brazil. The interviewed participants were 20 comprising of seven nurses and 13 physicians. In the second article by Bashir et al. (2018) the investigators used case study site where data was collected from the interviewed nurses in the facility. The case site was the Visiting Nurse Association (VNA) of Omaha since it uses telehealth interventions to provide patient care. The VNA telehealth nurses volunteered to participate in the study. The investigators theoretical framework comprised of the TNSQ model based on three steps: survey research, preliminary interviews and use of SERVQUAL to assess the level of TNSQ adaption. The approach allowed the investigators to get information from the nurses for effective analysis and enhanced understanding of the deployment of telehealth.
Results of the Studies
Article1: The article by Barbosa et al. (2017) observe that their analysis produced four groups from the dialogues. These include understanding the significance of communication, influence of interpersonal relationship on communication, communication through technology and learning the communication process. The authors assert that nurses using telehealth perceive that it facilitates effective nursing practice, especially mitigating nursing shortage by improving access and engagement of patients. The findings also show that effective training of nurses leads to better adoption of technology for quality care provision.
Article 2: The finding from Bashir et al. (2018) article show a positive relationship between telehealth and quality of the services. The study shows that nurses can embrace telehealth not just to improve quality but also reduce the problem of nursing shortage as they can offer care to patients remotely. The study highlights the importance of telehealth process in daily monitoring of patient health leading to better interactions with families.
Ethical Considerations
Research studies must have an ethical perspective based on concepts like informed consent, provision of sufficient information, and non-biased selection of participants. Ethical considerations like getting approval from Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) validate findings from any study as they indicate adherence and compliance to set legal and moral thresholds. An analysis of the two articles shows that they considered the critical ethical aspects of informed consent and approval from IRB. The study by Barbosa et al. (2017) was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Nursing School at Sao Paulo University. Therefore, it met national and international ethical standards in research that involves human participants. The study by Bashir et al. (2018) was approved by the respective study sites and institutional boards for ethical research. In both studies, all participants gave their informed consent to be part of the investigation. Further, most were healthcare workers who understand ethical provisions required from researcher and the idea of informed consent.
Conclusion
Qualitative studies on the deployment of telehealth in nursing to reduce the nursing shortage problem show that increased participation of nurses in technology portends positive outcomes for providers and patients. Nursing shortage is a critical health issue that needs innovative solutions and interventions. The studies show that by leveraging technologies, healthcare organizations and providers can address the issue of nursing shortage, improve quality care delivery, and expand access to patients in rural settings who are underserved.
References
Barbosa, I. D. A., & Silva, M. J. P. D. (2017). Nursing care by telehealth: what is the influence
of distance on communication? Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 70, 928-934.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0142
Bashir, A., & Bastola, D. R. (2018). Perspectives of nurses toward telehealth efficacy and quality
of health care: pilot study. JMIR medical informatics, 6(2), e9080. DOI: 10.2196/medinform.9080
Gajarawala, S. N., & Pelkowski, J. N. (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for
Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 218-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
Neville, C. W. (2018). Telehealth: A balanced look at incorporating this technology into practice.
SAGE Open Nursing, 4, 2377960818786504. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960818786504
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Title: NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Qualitative Studies
Background of Study
There are different research methodologies that can be utilized in the research processes. There are both qualitative and quantitative research processes. Qualitative research involves the collection and analysis of non-numerical data such as texts, videos, or audio documents in order to understand concepts, experiences, and opinions. Qualitative research processes can also be utilized to gather in-depth insights into the problem and generate unique or new ideas for the research process. Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research which often involves the collection, and the analysis of the numerical data. The qualitative study I, “Qualitative study of telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes” by Hanley et al., (2015) involves an investigation of the experiences of professionals and patients taking part in the randomized controlled trials of blood pressure, blood glucose, and weight. The problem under consideration is type 2 diabetes. The article is significant to nursing because it entails different approaches geared towards enhancing evidence-based practices. The purpose of the article is to determine the best interventions for the patients suffering from type 2 diabetes. One of the research question is: Does telemonitoring of blood glucose, blood pressure and weight in primary care a promising approach of improving diabetes management?
The qualitative article II considered is: “Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association” by Colberg et al. (2016). The main objective of the article is to determine the impacts of physical activity/exercise on the management of diabetes. The article is significant to nursing since it involves consideration of different nursing approaches or interventions when it come to the management of diseases. The purpose of the article is to determine the best interventions that can be applied in the management of type 2 diabetes (Colberg et al., 2016). The objective of the research article II is to determine the best interventions for the individuals suffering from type 2 diabetes. The article focuses on the physical activity as the best approach when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes. From the research article, the American Diabetes association recommend physical activities/exercise in the management of type 2 diabetes. There are different other interventions mentioned in the article; however, the focus is on the physical activities. The main research question in the article is: does the physical activity/exercise aids in the reduction of type 2 diabetes? The question covers all the aspect of the paper. In other words, it reflects the research objectives, the purpose of the research and literature review.
How the Two Articles Support the Nurse Practice Issue Chosen
These articles provide helpful information that can be applied in answering the PICOT question on diabetes. The issue is type 2 diabetes. From the research articles, there are literature reviews consisting of advanced information required in the understanding of the topic and the main issues surrounding the PICOT question. Article I elaborates on the effective interventions that can be undertaken to reduce type 2 diabetes. Also, with the established outcomes from the research processes, the two articles provide elaborate and conclusive information that can be used to answer or address different aspects of the PICOT question. Article II elaborates on the physical activities or the exercise as one of the main practice of reducing type 2 diabetes.
The research question is well elaborated and it provides a conclusive information about the importance of physical activities on reducing type 2 diabetes. This can therefore be applied in the development of interventions required in the management of type 2 diabetes. Some of the physical activities movement that enhances the use of energy. Structured physical activities are always required to ensure effective outcomes (Hanley et al., 2015). Physical exercise often improves glucose control when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes. Also, physical activities reduce cardiovascular risks which are also associated with the management of type 2 diabetes. Regular physical exercise can stop or delay type 2 diabetes.
How the Interventions and Comparison Groups in the Articles Compare To Those Identified in Your PICOT Question
The interventions and comparison groups from the two articles are comparable to the ones that have been identified in the PICOT statement. There is a high similarity between the comparison and the intervention groups in all the two articles identified for the study. The PICOT question is about type 2 diabetes or the best interventions required in the management of type two diabetes. The comparison in the groups in the two research articles serves as a source of counterfactual causal inference. The goal of the comparison group in the research articles and the ones in the PICOT question is to estimate the effects of treatment.
Method of Study
The two qualitative articles adhere to the qualitative approach. However, study II incorporates observational approaches to the institute findings on the basis of the objectives and the research questions. On the other hand, the qualitative study I applies survey techniques to establish significant findings. One of the benefits of the observational method of the qualitative research is that it is simpler and easier to use. The disadvantage of the method is that there is always lack of in-depth analysis leading to the lack of comprehensive outcomes.
Results of Study
The qualitative study II concludes that physical activities/ exercise reduce the cases of type 2 diabetes. In other words, physical exercise is one of the best interventions in the management of type 2 diabetes. From the information obtained from different sources, qualitative research article II concludes that the adoption and maintenance of physical activities are essential for the blood glucose management and overall health among the individuals suffering from type 2 diabetes (Latimer et al., 2017). The recommendations and precautions vary depending on individual characteristics and health status.
The two qualitative studies have different implications in the nursing practice. The studies facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and practical skills when it comes to the management of type 2 diabetes. In other words, the two studies provide new knowledge in the nursing practices and the understanding of the steps that ought to be undertaken to reduce health complications associated with type 2 diabetes.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are significant in the research processes. From the two qualitative research articles, there is the portrayal of confidentiality and respect for human dignity. These are some of the ethical considerations that have been applied in the two research articles. Before engaging in a research process, the acquisition of consent from the respondents is always necessary. Also, there is always the need to keep patients’ information safe so as to avoid the loss of important information. When undertaking the above qualitative studies, researchers adhered to the confidentiality of information which is considered to be one of the major ethical concerns. Also, they managed to do their studies in line with the requirements that protect human dignity, especially for the study participants.
References
Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Yardley, J. E., Riddell, M. C., Dunstan, D. W., Dempsey, P. C., … & Tate, D. F. (2016). Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes care, 39(11), 2065-2079. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1728
Hanley, J., Fairbrother, P., McCloughan, L., Pagliari, C., Paterson, M., Pinnock, H., … & McKinstry, B. (2015). Qualitative study of telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes. BMJ open, 5(12). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008896
Latimer, S., Hewitt, J., Stanbrough, R., & McAndrew, R. (2017). Reducing medication errors: Teaching strategies that increase nursing students’ awareness of medication errors and their prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.004
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 200.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) 4: Good (94.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%)
Content 75.0%
Qualitative Studies 5.0% Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. N/A N/A Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.
Background of Study 10.0% Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Method of Study 15.0% Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.
NRS-433V NRS-433V-O502 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Results of Study 15.0% Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Ethical Considerations 15.0% Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |