Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe Included After Question
NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe
NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe
Collaboration Café
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice.
Select one current, qualitative or mixed methods scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
- Description of the purpose
- Explanation of research design
- Discussion of sample
- Description of data collection methods
- Summary of findings
- Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
- Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
- Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe
Title: NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe
Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.
During the week, read a minimum of two articles posted by peers and add your thoughts about whether you feel their article would support an EBP change.
The John Hopkins tool does not need to be turned in, it is a worksheet for you to decide what type of article you have.
For full credit, submit your initial post by Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. Complete your two responses to peers by Sunday at 11:59 PM MT.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 505 Week 4: Collaboration Cafe
**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
Just a reminder! Some of you may have needed more time to watch my video!
Do not submit your research article’s summation in narrative form for this week’s collaborative cafe on qualitative research articles!
Continue to categorize your research.
- Description of the purpose
- Explanation of research design
- Discussion of sample
- Description of data collection methods
- Summary of findings
- Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
- Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
- Recommendations regarding potential applications for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
Attach the article to your post and include the complete reference for the article in your post.
For a complete understanding of your success in the Week Five Research Summary Assignment!
For your WEEK FIVE ASSIGNMENT!
Use the Research Summary Table Worksheet Links to an external site
Do not include a title page.
Do not include a reference page.
NUMBER YOUR ARTICLES 1-10!
Continue to categorize your research.
Do not submit your research article’s summation in narrative form!
You will provide a COMPLETE REFERENCE 7th Edition APA reference for each article in your week five assignment.
The week five worksheet assignment shows the following:
APA Author/Title/Year (APA format):
PER THE RUBRIC
| APA | 20 | 10% |
|
Contribution to Review of the Literature:
Understanding how this literature correlates with your practice change is the key to becoming an esteemed and respected NP for translating research into evidence-based positive patient outcomes in this practice change!
I have attached the NP Expectations for Scholarly Sources for your success!
This is a TURNITIN Assignment
Your score should be at 25% or less! Students have two opportunities to submit their assignments on this platform!
The first allows you to review your work if over 25%. The second submission is your final. This is the submission I will grade.
This is the week one announcement!
“Turnitin® (TII) is a service that monitors for textual similarities among student papers and posts by comparing them with information found on the Internet and in a repository of student papers. Students agree all required papers, discussion posts, or other written learning activities may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com to detect plagiarism. Each assignment may be submitted two times, with the second submission considered final. The final submission will be graded by your instructor.”
If your first submission is higher than 25%, REVIEW the report! It requires you to paraphrase the author’s work, which means putting the information in your own words and citing it.
I am sharing some URL guidelines and the contents of the 7th Edition APA PDF and writing to facilitate your scholarly writing!
- APA Guidelines: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelinesLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.
- Academic Writer: https://academicwriter-apa-org.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/Links to an external site.Links to an external site.
- APA Quick Guide: https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/reference-guide.pdfLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.
Please watch the video for helpful hints!
I look forward to reading your work in week five!
Please reach out to me with any questions!
I want you to do great on this assignment!
Helpful information for the Week Five Assignment!
Author/Title/Year (APA format): APA 7th edition – Remember: Use FULL Reference
You don’t have to find a certain amount of each type of research article. They can be ten articles of your choice, just put them under the correct heading and number the article one through ten!
For example- you may do ten that do not include any CPGs or ten that do not have any meta-analysis, etc.
You do not need to have 2 of each type of article.
If you have any questions- please reach out.
Week 4 Article Review
The selected article to be reviewed is related to the population section of the PICOT question. The publication titled Older Patients’ Preferences and Views Related To Nonface-To-Face Diabetes Chronic Care Management: A Qualitative Study From Southeast Louisiana was written by Bazzano et al. (2019).
Description of the Purpose
This qualitative research aimed to explore older diabetic patients’ opinions and preferences regarding the care management methods nonface-to-face. Additionally, the study’s purpose is to use the results to improve diabetic care for this specific population. Patient information can also be utilized to enhance the quality of care and identify individual needs.
Explanation of Research Design
The research design used the qualitative element of the Louisiana Experiment Assessing Diabetes Outcomes. Case study design and thematic analysis were used for patient interviews. Four coders classified data from interviews, field notes, and discussions. Central themes were conversed among the stakeholders and research team.
Discussion of Sample
The study involved 30 participants, with an average age of 68.3 and 14.5 years since Type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis. Most were female and Medicare-insured, while others had different insurance types. All participants had T2D with at least one coexisting chronic illness. About 13% participated in Nonface-To-Face Diabetes Chronic Care Management (NFF CCM) programs reimbursed by Medicare.
Description of Data Collection Methods
Accordingly, 30 participants, including caregivers, were interviewed using a discussion guide. Between October 2017 and February 2018, interviews were conducted personally or by phone (Bazzano et al., 2019). Audio recordings and field notes were used, ensuring privacy. Researchers followed guidelines for reporting qualitative research and emphasized data completeness and trustworthiness. Tulane University Institutional Review Board permitted the study.
Summary of Findings
This research found that patients felt that communicating with a health professional by phone was relevant. Some patients also noted that personalized relationships with their providers were more effective (Bazzano et al., 2019). Therefore, chronic care management programs must be flexible and responsive to meet individual needs.
The Study’s Strengths and Limitations
One of the study’s strengths was that the results mirrored findings from other research articles. The research also had limitations, including challenges in recruiting participants from different health systems.
Recommendation
At the population level, future research should investigate whether enhancing diabetes care can be achieved by modifying NFF programming and support to eliminate distinctive barriers.
Reference
Bazzano, A., Monnette, A., Wharton, M., Price-Haywood, E., Nauman, E., Dominick, P., Glover, C., Hu, G., & Shi, L. (2019). Older patients’ preferences and views related to non-face-to-face diabetes chronic care management: A qualitative study from southeast Louisiana. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13, 901-911. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s201072Links to an external site.
Read Also: NR 505 Research Summary