Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

Sample Answer for Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper Included After Question

Module 4 – Case IMPACTS OF LEADERSHIP/ROLE OF PARTNERSHIPS Assignment Overview This Case Assignment consist of two parts, so please ensure that you set aside ample time to complete each. Case Assignment Part I: You have recently been hired as manager of health and safety in a petroleum refinery industry. The environmental performance of this company has been unclear to the community and the media has recently portrayed this refinery quite negatively. Your Task for Part I: 1) Describe the value of a performancebased management culture for the sustainability of health and safety responsibilities in this company. 2) Apply criteria described in your reading to design an environmental impact assessment that addresses the environmental impacts of this refinery on air quality. In your protocol, be sure to show how you would address the 3 categories of Environmental Performance Indicators (management performance, environmental performance and environmental condition indicators). For each part of the protocol, illustrate with examples. Part II: You are a manager of environmental health and safety at a local health department. You have learned that drinking water supplies have been contaminated with a virus (Cryptosporidium) that cannot be destroyed by chlorination and that can cause severe illness. This is believed to be an act of bioterrorism. The module readings covered the ecological model and how it may be used to identify partners for improving environmental health and its public health impacts. Your Task for Part II: Apply your knowledge of the Ecological Model of Health to: 1) Identify 2 partners that may be engaged for each domain of the ecological model. 2) Describe the responsibility and role of these partners in providing or disseminating information to communicate risk to the public. 3) Show how the partners will address a culturally adverse audience in communicating risk to the public. Assignment Expectations Use information from your module readings/articles as well as appropriate research to support your selection. Length: The CA assignment should be 8-10 pages long (doublespaced) for both parts combined. References: At least six additional references (beyond required readings) must be included from academic sources (e.g., peerreviewed journal articles. Quoted materials should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation marks. In-text citations are required as well as a list of references at the end of the assignment. (APA format is recommended.) Organization: Subheadings should be used to organize your paper according to the questions. Format: APA format is recommended for this assignment. Grammar and Spelling: While no points are deducted for minor errors, assignments are expected to adhere to standard guidelines of grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence syntax. Points may be deducted if grammar and spelling impact clarity. The following items will be assessed in particular: • Achievement of learning objectives for SLP assignment. • Relevance: All content is connected to the question. Precision: Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are specific and accurate. • Depth of discussion: Points that lead to deeper issues are presented and integrated. • Breadth: Multiple perspectives and references, and multiple issues/factors are considered. • Evidence: Points are well supported with facts, statistics, and references. • Logic: Discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by premises, statements, or factual information. • Clarity: Writing is concise and understandable, and contains sufficient detail or examples. • Objectivity: Avoids the use of first person and subjective bias • Resources: Antweiler, W. (2014). Elements of environmental management. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Divison. Read: Chapter 4: Life cycle assessment (pp.103-115); and Chapter 6: Environmental impact assessment (pp. 163-180). Begun, L. & Malcolm, J. (2014). Leading public health: A competency framework. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. Read: Chapter 6: Engage diverse others in public health work (pp. 133-154); Chapter 7: Effectively wield power to increase the influence and impact of public health (pp. 155182); and Chapter 10: Lifelong leadership development (pp. 233-252). Burger J. (2008). Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. The Science of the total environment, 400(1-3), 6–19. Gamboa-Maldonado, T., Marshak, H. H., Sinclair, R., Montgomery, S., & Dyjack, D. T. (2012). Building capacity for community disaster preparedness: A call for collaboration between public environmental health and emergency preparedness and response programs. Journal of Environmental Health, 75(2), 24-29. Hawkins, C. V., Krause, R., Feiock, R. C., & Curley, C. (2018). The administration and management of environmental sustainability initiatives: a collaborative perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 61(11), 2015–2031. Available in the Trident Online Library. Levy, B. S. (ed.) (2011). Chapter 35: Responding to community environmental health concerns. In Occupational and Environmental Health: Recognizing and Preventing Disease and Injury (Vol. 6th ed). New York: Oxford University Press. Available in the Trident Online Library. Tompa, E., Dolinschi, R., & Natale, J. (2013). Economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics intervention in a textile plant. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 480-487. Victory, K. R., Shugart, J., Burrer, S., Dowell, C. H., & Delaney, L. J. (2019). Insights Into the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Program. Journal of Environmental Health, 82(1), 30–32. Available in the Trident Online Library. Optional Reading Baseman, J., Revere, D., Karasz, H., & Allan, S. (2018). Implementing Innovations in Public Health Agency Preparedness and Response Programs. American journal of public health, 108(S5), S369–S371. Available in the Trident Online Library. Eisenman, D., Chandra, A., Fogleman, S., Magana, A., Hendricks, A., Wells, K., … Plough, A. (2014). The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project – a community-level, public health initiative to build community disaster resilience. International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(8), 8475–8490. Available in the Trident Online Library. Nordlöf, H., Wiitavaara, B., Högberg, H., Westerling, R., Arbetshälsovetenskap, Högskolan i Gävle, . . . Avdelningen för arbets- och folkhälsovetenskap. (2017). A cross-sectional study of factors influencing occupational health and safety management practices in companies. Safety Science, 95, 92103. Available in the Trident Online Library. Pescud, M., Teal, R., Shilton, T., Slevin, T., Ledger, M., Waterworth, P., & Rosenberg, M. (2015). Employers’ views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing: a qualitative study. BMC public health, 15, 642. Available in the Trident Online Library. Module 4 – SLP IMPACTS OF LEADERSHIP/ROLE OF PARTNERSHIPS The SLP for this course is based on a manufacturing company of your choice. The facility employs at least 75 workers. You are the Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety Manager for this company. Your task is to develop aspects of a health and safety program that addresses worker injury and illness prevention, as well as environmental health and safety protection. In this SLP, you will address the role of leadership skills and workplace teams in the improvement of health and safety in the workplace, in the occupational setting of your SLP. You will also address the role of partnerships in health and safety at your facility. Your Tasks for This Assignment: In spite of your efforts, there has been recent increases in reported injuries, and many workers are losing work days, mostly due to ergonomic injuries, such as sprained backs: 1. Describe the role of leadership skills in managing health and safety in this workplace. 2. Apply concepts of transformational leadership to describe how you would manage health and safety in this company, at a time when change is needed. 3. Describe the role that workplace teams can play in assessing and reducing hazards that are resulting in injuries. 4. Examine 3 strategies you would use to motivate these teams. 5. Examine the role of 2 community partners that you will include on an on-going basis to get involved in preventing health and safety risks to workers and risks to the surrounding community; illustrate with specific examples. 6. Identify 2 community partners that you will keep informed of emergency situations; examine their role in protecting the community. SLP Assignment Expectations Use information from your module readings/articles as well as appropriate research to support your selection. Length: The SLP assignment should be 8-10 pages long (double-spaced). References: At least six references must be included from academic sources (e.g., peer-reviewed journal articles), required readings excluded. Quoted materials should not exceed 10% of the total paper (since the focus of these assignments is critical thinking). Use your own words and build on the ideas of others. Materials copied verbatim from external sources must be enclosed in quotation. Resources: Antweiler, W. (2014). Elements of environmental management. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Divison. Read: Chapter 4: Life cycle assessment (pp.103-115); and Chapter 6: Environmental impact assessment (pp. 163-180). Begun, L. & Malcolm, J. (2014). Leading public health: A competency framework. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. Read: Chapter 6: Engage diverse others in public health work (pp. 133-154); Chapter 7: Effectively wield power to increase the influence and impact of public health (pp. 155-182); and Chapter 10: Lifelong leadership development (pp. 233-252). Burger J. (2008). Environmental management: integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. The Science of the total environment, 400(1-3), 6–19. Gamboa-Maldonado, T., Marshak, H. H., Sinclair, R., Montgomery, S., & Dyjack, D. T. (2012). Building capacity for community disaster preparedness: A call for collaboration between public environmental health and emergency preparedness and response programs. Journal of Environmental Health, 75(2), 24-29. Hawkins, C. V., Krause, R., Feiock, R. C., & Curley, C. (2018). The administration and management of environmental sustainability initiatives: a collaborative perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 61(11), 2015–2031. Available in the Trident Online Library. Levy, B. S. (ed.) (2011). Chapter 35: Responding to community environmental health concerns. In Occupational and Environmental Health: Recognizing and Preventing Disease and Injury (Vol. 6th ed). New York: Oxford University Press. Available in the Trident Online Library. Tompa, E., Dolinschi, R., & Natale, J. (2013). Economic evaluation of a participatory ergonomics intervention in a textile plant. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 480-487. Victory, K. R., Shugart, J., Burrer, S., Dowell, C. H., & Delaney, L. J. (2019). Insights Into the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s Emergency Preparedness and Response Program. Journal of Environmental Health, 82(1), 30–32. Available in the Trident Online Library. Optional Reading Baseman, J., Revere, D., Karasz, H., & Allan, S. (2018). Implementing Innovations in Public Health Agency Preparedness and Response Programs. American journal of public health, 108(S5), S369–S371. Available in the Trident Online Library. Eisenman, D., Chandra, A., Fogleman, S., Magana, A., Hendricks, A., Wells, K., … Plough, A. (2014). The Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience Project – a community-level, public health initiative to build community disaster resilience. International journal of environmental research and public health, 11(8), 8475–8490. Available in the Trident Online Library. Nordlöf, H., Wiitavaara, B., Högberg, H., Westerling, R., Arbetshälsovetenskap, Högskolan i Gävle, . . . Avdelningen för arbets- och folkhälsovetenskap. (2017). A cross-sectional study of factors influencing occupational health and safety management practices in companies. Safety Science, 95, 92-103. Available in the Trident Online Library. Pescud, M., Teal, R., Shilton, T., Slevin, T., Ledger, M., Waterworth, P., & Rosenberg, M. (2015). Employers’ views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing: a qualitative study. BMC public health, 15, 642. Available in the Trident Online Library. Reflections on Course Concepts Given the readings and assignments in the course: • • • Identify and briefly discuss two concepts in this course that you believe will be most applicable to the professional discipline you will enter upon completion of your degree program. What is the importance of these concepts to the professional discipline? How will you use these concepts in your future career? Optional: Offer feedback on how the course and/or facilitation of the course can be improved. Reflection is a mental process that challenges you to use critical thinking to examine the course information, analyze it carefully, make connections with previous knowledge and experience, and draw conclusions based on the resulting ideas. A well-cultivated critical thinker raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely; gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively; comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards; thinks open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems. (Paul & Elder, 2008) In order to earn maximum credit, the comment should be more than your opinion, and more than a quick “off the top of your head” response. Be sure to support your statements, cite sources properly, cite within the text of your comments, and list your reference(s). The response must be a minimum of 250 words. Paul, R. & Elder, L. (February 2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

Title:  Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper
Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Trident University International Module 4 Impacts of Leadership Role of Partnerships Paper

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100