NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Assessment 2 Instructions: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Title: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Clinical Diagnosis

Disturbed sleep patterns can cause a significant disruption in quality of life. It is essential to take an evidence-based approach to treat this diagnosis and improve long-term outcomes. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice provides structure and guidance for nursing interventions while incorporating the concept of using research as part of the decision-making process. Simulation software, such as Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence, furthers these efforts by allowing nurses to practice case scenarios related to disturbed sleep patterns (Duff et al., 2020). This interactive platform gives nurses the opportunity to apply their skillset in a safe and controlled environment, encouraging the use of best practices like those outlined in the Iowa formulation. Through this combination of hands-on experience and evidence-based education, nurses can tailor treatments more specifically to individual patient needs, ensuring patients receive the proper care that focuses on promoting overall health and wellness with disturbed sleep patterns used as an assessment tool.

Sleep pattern disturbances can be incredibly debilitating for patients, compromising their functioning, emotional regulation, and quality of life. Such difficulties can arise due to various causes such as sleep deprivation, medications, depression, and co-morbid conditions (Lin et al., 2021). Provided the varied etiologies and degree of presentation among individuals suffering from sleep pattern disturbances, it is imperative that an evidence-based approach is employed when attempting to diagnose this issue. With this method, clinicians are able to draw upon research to determine the best practice for each unique situation. Additionally, an evidence-based approach helps clinicians assess how one’s current situation may interact with a prescribed treatment; thereby allowing tailored care plans that take into consideration the unpredictable nature of a person’s condition over time (Qi et al., 2020). An evidence-based approach not only improves diagnosis accuracy but also enhances efficiency in providing best-practice treatments for patients struggling with sleep pattern disturbances.

Criteria For Determining Credibility

When researching a diagnosis for disturbed sleep patterns, specific criteria should be considered to determine the credibility of the resources used. Firstly, the authority of the authors producing the material should be established. This can involve verifying qualifications and experience in relevant disciplines, such as medical practices and sleep science. For example, a journal article’s author listing should include credentials such as MD or Ph.D. degrees plus years of experience that allow one to determine if they have a legitimate background in that field. Secondly, it is important to examine if claims made within the resource are properly referenced so that other documents and studies relating to the topic can be verified to provide additional support (Speroni et al., 2020). Finally, an analysis of published sources is necessary; while reliable information can come from websites operated by government-associated entities or universities, personal blogs, and other forums may not possess accurate material and could lead one on a false track for determining their diagnosis. Taking these considerations into account will help readers distinguish credible information from unreliable sources when seeking answers related to disturbed sleep patterns diagnosis.

In the simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence, participants are asked to analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources related to a quality or safety issue or diagnosis of disturbed sleep patterns. This simulation is an important tool that helps practitioners develop their skills in evaluating the many types of evidence that are available today (Tucker et al., 2021). By considering factors such as the source, purpose, validity, reliability, and relevance of certain research findings and other resources, practitioners can make sound decisions based on the best possible evidence. Additionally, it is essential for practitioners to continually update their understanding of current research in order to engage effectively with new developments in order to provide quality care.

When researching disturbed sleep patterns, two valuable sources to utilize are the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and an article from the BMJ Open medical journal named “Disturbed Sleep Predicts Cognitive Impairment in Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease”. The former source is a professional organization that focuses on bettering sleep education (Fang et al., 2019). Their website contains a variety of evidence-based resources and links to patient education materials. It contains recent information that is constantly being updated, making it; therefore, highly credible.

The second source, the BMJ journal article, provides detailed research regarding disrupted sleep and its correlation with cognitive impairments. This piece was published in 2020 – making it an up-to-date resource – and cites credible studies and experiments to support its conclusions. This particular article draws on the evidence of multiple relevant studies in order to make accurate claims about its topic matter, giving it high credibility as well (Freeman et al., 2020).  Taking both these sources into consideration can lead to determining which one’s findings hold more importance or relevance than the other when it comes to disturbed sleep patterns topics.

Specific Sources to Help

In order to help address the issue of disturbed sleep patterns for her patient, a new nurse could benefit from three specific resources. The National Institute of Health provides comprehensive information on sleep disorders, their causes, and treatments, including evidence-based guidelines. For example, an online tutorial called “Getting a Good Night’s Sleep” can provide evidence-based tips for good sleeping habits. Secondly, The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence can help nurses evaluate reliable sources of information related to health issues (Cullen et al., 2020). The interactive module is designed to help nurses identify unreliable online sources and judge the credibility of published articles that they may use in providing healthcare services and making clinical decisions. Finally, large interdisciplinary teams that include sleep experts can also be very helpful in addressing this problem. Through case studies, nutritionists and exercise physiologists can assist with developing an individualized plan and evaluating its effectiveness by closely monitoring behavioral changes and patient needs.

Evidence-Based Practice Model

The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice is an EBP framework that places an emphasis on the use of credible evidence during the planning, implementation, and evaluation stages of quality and safety improvement initiatives. This model calls for healthcare workers to evaluate the competency, ethics, and experience involved in any research related to a particular issue before utilizing it when formulating a decision (Hanrahan et al., 2019). Through this method, a team can achieve measurable success with their quality or safety project while also increasing patient outcomes and personnel satisfaction. With regard to disturbed sleep patterns, evidence-based practice must be employed in order to provide patients with the best possible care. In doing so, reliable research is necessary to identify risk factors associated with chronic sleeping issues and what forms of treatment have been proven to be effective from case studies or relevant literature. The numbers don’t lie—when healthcare professionals take advantage of the expertise developed by utilizing evidence-based practices in concert with disturbed sleep diagnosis or healthcare interventions, everyone wins!

In a review of the literature, the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice has been identified as an appropriate model for disturbed sleep patterns. This model provides a structured approach to evidence-based practice and effectively integrates both research and clinical expertise to address patient outcomes (Duff et al., 2020). It emphasizes that decisions should be made only after a thorough examination of the relevant evidence from experimental, observational, and practice-based studies. Additionally, it allows for the incorporation of data from other sources like client preferences and values providing for an individualized approach to care delivery. Furthermore, this model encourages multidisciplinary team collaboration in order to foster more effective integrated care plans. Thus, it can be seen why the Iowa Model is a suitable choice when addressing disturbed sleep patterns in patient care.

Sample Answer for NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Included After Question

Develop a 2-4 page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

Introduction

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models. EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health Determining the Credibility of Evidence activity prior to developing the report. The activity is a media simulation that offers an opportunity to review a scenario and work on determining the credibility of presented evidence. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 2 successfully. This media simulation is one potential source of context on which to base your assessment submission. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing this assessment:

  • The specific diagnosis/health issue you identified in your previous assessment.
  • The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.
  • A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

Instructions

The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.

Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:

Evidence-Based Practice Models
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
Stetler Model
Ottawa Model
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode
John Hopkins Model
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model

For this assessment:

  • Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
  • Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
    • Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
  • Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
  • Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
    • This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
  • Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Review the literature below and choose the appropriate model for your diagnosis/health care issue.
    • Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF] and Evidence-Based Practice Models help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
  • Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

 

NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 2: Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission: 2-4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
  • Number of references: Cite 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
    • Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
  • Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
    • Identify an evidence-based practice model (such as Iowa, Stetler, John Hopkins, etc.) and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
  • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Does not describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Lists a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Describes a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Describes a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. Provides a specific rationale for the importance or benefit of applying an evidence-based approach. Uses literature to support discussion.
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Does not explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Lists criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Explains criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Explains criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites. Notes one or more ways the criteria could be applied to a specific resource.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Does not analyze the credibility or relevance of evidence or resources. Describes the credibility or relevance of evidence or resources, but does not offer a complete analysis. The specific context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis may be unclear as well. Analyzes the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Analyzes the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis. Additionally, identifies the most useful evidence or resource based upon the analysis.
Identify an evidence-based practice model (such as John Hopkins, Stetler, Iowa, etc.) and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Does not identify an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Identifies an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Does not explain the model or the importance of incorporating credible evidence. Identifies an evidence-based practice model and explains the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Explains the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an evidence-based practice model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Notes specific examples of how the model could help improve the chosen issue or diagnosis/health care issue.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions. Attempts to organize content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains several errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Does not apply APA formatting to headings, intext citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly. Attempts to apply APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, intext citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

 

 

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.