NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Essays
Sample Answer for NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays Included After Question
Week 1: Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare
You are a DNP-prepared nurse working in the ICU of your local hospital. A patient is struggling with balance, and you indicate this patient is a “fall risk” in your charts. However, after a long night, caring for many patients, you forget to indicate this risk on the patient’s door, which is procedure at the hospital. You complete your shift and go home for the night.
The scenario presented highlights how easy it is for an error to occur in healthcare. Humans are prone to error, and DNP-prepared nurses are no exception; however, certain policies and procedures can be enacted to improve patient safety and minimize errors.
Almost all occupational fields rely on safety and quality practices to ensure employees, customers, etc., are in a safe environment. These quality and safety practices help organizations to limit errors and improve performance; the field of nursing is no different. It is important for the nurse leader to recognize that quality and safety measures help to improve patient safety by installing processes and workflows into nursing practice that may result in fewer errors.
This week, you will examine foundations of quality improvement in healthcare, as well as explore patient safety. You will also review your experience with these practices and consider your role as a future DNP-prepared nurse.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze quality and safety for nursing practice
- Analyze quality and safety for healthcare delivery
- Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse as a function of quality and safety
- Analyze the concept of just culture in healthcare organizations
- Analyze how a just culture impacts healthcare organizations
- Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in supporting environments for just culture in healthcare organizations
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Nash, D. B., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2019). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (4th ed.). Health Administration Press.
- Chapter 1, “Overview of Healthcare Quality” (pp. 5–47)
- Chapter 2, “History and the Quality Landscape” (pp. 49–74)
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2021). https://www.ihi.org
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Essays
Discussion 1: Quality and Safety in Healthcare and Nursing Practice (300 WORDS, 4 REFERENCES, DEADLINE: TUESDAY AT 4 PM)
How will you, as a future DNP-prepared nurse, keep patients safe? This is a multi-layered question with many different answers. Yet, it is important to note that as the nurse leader, quality and safety measures are at the forefront of how you deliver nursing practice. NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays
Photo Credit: [Henglein and Steets]/[Cultura]/Getty Images
Quality and safety measures are integral components in healthcare. According to Nash et al. (2019), “Around the end of the twentieth century and the start of the twenty-first, a number of reports presented strong evidence of widespread quality deficiencies and highlighted a need for substantial change to ensure high-quality care for all patients” (p. 5). Understanding the prominence of error, it is important to consider your role as a DNP-prepared nurse.
For this Discussion, take a moment to consider your experience with quality and safety in your nursing practice. Reflect on your experience and consider how your role may support quality and safety measures.
Reference:
Nash, D. B., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2019). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (4th ed.). Health Administration Press.
To Prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources for this week.
- Reflect on your experience with nursing practice, specifically as it relates to the function of quality and safety. For example, consider whether your current organization supports quality and safety. How might your role help to support these measures in your organization or nursing practice?
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a brief description of any previous experience with quality and safety. Then, explain how your role as the DNP-prepared nurse represents a function of quality and safety for nursing practice and healthcare delivery. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 5 of Week 1
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by expanding upon your colleague’s post or suggesting an additional alternative perspective on quality and safety.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion 1 Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 5 of Week 1
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion 1
Discussion 2: Just Culture (300 WORDS, 4 REFERENCES, DEADLINE: TUESDAY AT 7 PM)
As an alternative to a punitive system, application of the Just Culture model, which has been widely used in the aviation industry, seeks to create an environment that encourages individuals to report mistakes so that the precursors to errors can be better understood in order to fix the system issues.
—American Nurses Association, 2010
Mistakes happen. There is no way to avoid all mistakes, so how might your practice change if the reporting of mistakes was welcomed, versus penalized? How might this lead to a better understanding of quality improvement and safety needs? How might patient safety be improved?
For this Discussion, consider the role of just culture in your organization. Reflect on your experience with just culture and consider how this model might support patient care.
Reference:
American Nurses Association. (2010). Just culture [Position statement]. https://www.nursingworld.org/~4afe07/globalassets/practiceandpolicy/health-and-safety/just_culture.pdf
Photo Credit: ilkercelik / Adobe Stock
To Prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources for this week, and reflect on your experiences with just culture.
- Consider how just culture connects to quality and safety. What is the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in promoting just culture in organizations and nursing practice?
By Day 4 of Week 1
Post an explanation of whether your organization uses a just culture. Then, explain how this might impact quality and safety for your healthcare organization, and why. What is the DNP-prepared nurse’s role in supporting a just culture environment in a healthcare organization? Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by expanding upon your colleague’s post or suggesting an additional alternative perspective on the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in supporting a just culture in a healthcare organization.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion 2 Rubric
Post by Day 4 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 1 Discussion 2
What’s Coming Up in Week 2?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
Next week, you will examine the definitions of quality. You will explore nurse-sensitive quality indicators and evaluate the influence of these indicators on nursing practice.
Looking Ahead: IHI Modules
This Assignment requires completion of 13 IHI Open School modules and the completion of the Certificate of Completion at the Basic level. There are 13 modules that you must complete over the course of these 11 weeks.
Photo Credit: NicoElNino / Adobe Stock
| Improvement Capability | Patient Safety |
| QI 101: Introduction to Health Care Improvement | PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety |
| QI 102: How to Improve With the Model for Improvement | PS 102: From Error to Harm |
| QI 103: Testing and Measuring Changes With PDSA Cycles | PS 103: Human Factors and Safety |
| QI 104: Interpreting Data: Run Charts, Control Charts, and Other Measurement Tools | PS 104: Teamwork and Communication in a Culture of Safety |
| QI 105: Leading Quality Improvement | PS 105: Responding to Adverse Events |
| Triple Aim for Populations | Person and Family-Centered Care |
| TA 101: Introduction to the Triple Aim for Populations | PFC 101: Introduction to Person- and Family-Centered Care |
| Leadership | |
| L 101: Introduction to Healthcare Leadership |
To access the IHI Certificate Program, go to IHI.org, and register to create an account. Be sure to enter Walden University as your organization. Under Role, you will select student. Under Organization, you will select school, and under education type, you will select nurse.
Go to the Education tab, and select Open School Courses. Click on Online Courses and then on Certificates and CEUs. You want to ensure that you are viewing the Basic Certificate in Quality and Safety. Click on Earn Your Certificate Today, and you should be in your student dashboard to begin completing the IHI modules. You will want to click on Go to your Learning Center. On the left-side navigation menu, you will want to Search Catalog to search for, and enroll in, each of the 13 modules required for this certificate.
You will earn contact hours for each module, and once all 13 are completed, you will download the certificate of achievement. Please save this certificate. You will be required to upload this to gradebook in evidence of your completion.
You must complete all IHI modules and submit your certificate by Day 2 of Week 11.
Looking Ahead: Clinical Assignment: DNP Project Faculty Advisor and Site Identification
Preparation for project planning will begin during the clinical component of NURS 8302. By Day 7 of week 6, you will identify an organization that you will approach to discuss a gap in practice or practice change that you might assist with as your DNP project.
Possible appointments to explore a site for the project include those made with the chief nursing officer, director of quality improvement, or director of education. In a clinic or community agency, the contact person may be the director or someone in human resources. You may complete the project at your place of employment, as long as you are not working on your own unit or with people that you supervise.
Photo Credit: fizkes – stock.adobe.com
This project will include a development of a staff education program, development of a clinical practice guideline, or an evaluation of an existing quality improvement process. The project process cannot include patients or nursing students. The project cannot be completed at an academic setting.
Preparation for project planning will begin during the clinical component of NURS 8302. The DNP Project must follow guidelines set forth in one of the following DNP Project manuals:
- Clinical Practice Guidelines Manual
- Staff Education Manual
- Quality Improvement Evaluation Manual
NOTE: All forms and manuals are found on the DNP Capstone Resources site:
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/dnp
Your project team will consist of a preceptor or project mentor from the organization, and a three-member Faculty committee from Walden who will be assigned upon completion of this course. You will begin your project in the next term through the mentoring course, NURS 8702.
Once you identify a site and have contacted the organization, you will complete the DNP Project Faculty Advisor and Site Identification—Matching Request Form identifying the site and describing the possible practice change or gap to be addressed. This form must be completed and turned in by Day 7 of Week 6.
Approaching the organization:
- Identify the organization where you would like to make an appointment with organization leadership to discuss your DNP project. This can be within your workplace or at a different site. The site for the project does not need to be the same site as the clinical practicum site.
- Find out from the organization if there is a key person who oversees students doing DNP projects. This might be the director of nursing, the director of staff development, or the person in charge of quality improvement initiatives. In a clinic or community organization, this might be the medical director or a non-medical person in a leadership or administrative role. If there is no key person, your first contact should be someone from nursing leadership. If you are unsure of how to proceed, discuss with your NURS 8302 Faculty.
- Make an appointment with the identified person (above) to discuss the Walden University DNP project.
- NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays Briefly explain the focus of the DNP project.
- As a requirement of Walden University’s DNP degree, you are required to complete a DNP Project.
- This project will focus on a quality improvement initiative that integrates project management tools and techniques, as well as addresses a gap in nursing practice or an identified practice change.
- For the purpose of this project, a quality improvement initiative is defined as an intervention that supports an improvement in healthcare outcomes. This project will follow one of the DNP project manuals for the project and can focus on a staff education program, development of a clinical practice guideline, or an evaluation of an existing quality improvement process. The project process cannot include patients or nursing students.
- The project process requires a mentor from the organization that will work with the Walden Faculty Advisor to oversee the project process.
- Explore a possible gap in practice or practice change that the organization is seeking to address through an education program, clinical practice guideline, or evaluation of change completed by the organization to improve outcomes.
- Discuss identification of a project mentor for the project.
- Share the next steps in the process.
- You will be assigned a Faculty Advisor when the next term begins (date).
- You will contact organization representative during the first week of the term to set up a meeting with the Faculty Advisor, the organization representative, and the project mentor to discuss the project.
Next Week
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays
Title: NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_8302_Week1_Discussion2_Rubric NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays
| Excellent
90–100 |
Good
80–89 |
Fair
70–79 |
Poor
: 0–69 |
|||
| Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
||
| Main Posting:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
||
| First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Total Points: 100 NURS 8302 Week 1 Foundations of Quality and Patient Safety in Healthcare Esays | ||||||
Name: NURS_8302_Week1_Discussion2_Rubric
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Read: NURS 8302 ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ASSESSMENT TOOL TEMPLATE