NR 506 Week 3 Discussion:

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

Sample Answer for NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool Included After Question

Your organization is ready to implement a quality improvement initiative; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that perhaps not everyone is on board with the proposal.

What could be contributing to this potential resistance? How might organizational culture impact or influence the ability to engage in quality improvement initiatives?

Photo Credit: M-SUR – stock.adobe.com

Organizational culture is the shared way of thinking or feeling in a given organization. This culture creates the dynamic for a willingness to change and/or improve. For example, if an organizational culture is one in which change is welcomed to improve and all voices are encouraged to be shared, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative will likely be accepted and supported. However, if an organizational culture is one in which the acknowledgement of mistakes are penalized and only leadership voices are respected, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative may be met with hesitation and skepticism.

For this Assignment, you will consider the impact of cultural and organizational readiness as it relates to the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. You will consider the leadership strategies needed to support these measures and complete an Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources regarding the implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
  • Consider what stakeholders must be present to implement these initiatives, and reflect on the leadership strategies needed for success in promoting quality improvement initiatives in healthcare organizations and nursing practice.
  • Select a healthcare organization or nursing practice (with which you are familiar) to complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool
NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice you selected. Then, address the following:

  • What is the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement?
  • Is the organizational culture present for quality improvement?
  • What leadership strategies are present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality?

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7

Submit your completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool and the responses to the prompts for this Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 6 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

 

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 6 Assignment 1

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

Title: NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

One of the major focuses of healthcare organizations is to offer safe, efficient, and acceptable patient care services. As such, organizations should always be in pursuit of quality improvement projects geared toward improving patient care services and solving identified problems in the care environment. However, the success of such quality improvement initiatives hinges on the organizational culture in place (Coles et al.,2020). Therefore, the onus lies with the quality improvement project or change implementers to assess the organization’s culture and evaluate if it is ready for the implementation of the proposed quality improvement initiatives (Yoder-Wise & Sportsman, 2022). Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to explore the organization’s culture and determine its readiness for the implementation of the proposed quality improvement initiative. As such, various aspects will be discussed, including the state of the organizational readiness for quality improvement, whether the organizational culture is for quality improvement, and the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement experiences and health quality.

The State of Cultural/Organizational Readiness for Quality Improvement

As discussed earlier, organizational culture and readiness can hugely affect the implementation process of quality improvement initiatives. Therefore, it is important to assess the state of the organizational readiness for quality improvement (Fulop & Ramsay, 2019). In an effort to accomplish this, an organizational culture assessment tool with a total of sixteen questions was completed, as shown in the appendix.  These questions are designed in such a way that they help probe various aspects of the organization in terms of its readiness for quality improvement implementation. From the responses given, it is evident that the organization is ready for the implementation of the quality improvement initiatives. Such an observation was supported by a response of strongly agreeing to correct a process, approach, or procedure in case they are not working. Such a response showed that the organization and its leaders are ready to undertake a change process to help correct a procedure or a process that is not working. The response is encouraging and relevant as it shows that the organization is ready to welcome the proposed quality improvement as it can help improve the management of sepsis.

The Organizational Culture For Quality Improvement

The success of a quality improvement project also requires that the staff be supportive of the initiative. Therefore, it is also important to explore the staff’s attitude, behavior, and knowledge alongside that of the organization’s leaders in relation to quality improvement implementation (Crawford et al.,2023).  The organizational assessment tool revealed that the existing culture supports quality improvement. The organization uses various strategies, such as open and effective communication, which are both known to be quality improvement implementation enablers. Besides, the collaborative environment revealed among the staff members can be important in supporting the quality improvement initiative. Again, such aspects point further to the organization’s readiness to accept and support the proposed quality improvement to help improve patient outcomes and the organization’s reputation.

Leadership Strategies Present In the Organization to Support Quality Improvement Experiences and Healthcare Quality

At the center of any organization’s failure or success is the existing type of leadership. Previous research has shown that certain types of leadership styles and strategies have more potential to push organizations to success than others (Robbins& Davidhizar, 2020). Therefore, the organization assessment completed also revealed that the organization has various strategies that can support quality improvement and healthcare quality. One of the strategies identified is role or duty assignment and delegation. This is a strategy that the leaders use to ensure that every staff member is involved in the organization’s activities; as such, they feel part of the organization and valued as staff members. Therefore, it will be easier to implement the quality improvement initiative as the staff will be ready to support it without resistance.

The other strategy used in the organization is effective and open communication. There are well-established communication channels that are always open and also support two-way communication. As such, the members of staff and leaders are able to get information and communication in time and act on the same (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021). Open and effective communication will be key to supporting the quality improvement initiative and ensuring success in its implementation. The leaders also use a strategy of empowering and supporting staff members, especially those with proposals for improving the quality of patient care as well as safety. Therefore, these leadership strategies will also play a significant role in supporting the proposed quality improvement to ensure that its implementation is a success.

Conclusion

This write-up has explored the organization’s culture and readiness to support the proposed quality improvement. As such, an organizational culture assessment tool was used where a total of sixteen questions were addressed to assess various aspects of the organization. The assessment revealed that the organization is generally ready for the quality improvement project. In addition, the organization’s leadership strategies that are currently being used support the implementation of quality improvement projects. It was revealed that some of the strategies used include open and effective communication and offering support to the staff.

 

References

Coles, E., Anderson, J., Maxwell, M., Harris, F. M., Gray, N. M., Milner, G., & MacGillivray, S. (2020). The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review. Systematic Reviews9, 1-22. Doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3

Crawford, C. L., Rondinelli, J., Zuniga, S., Valdez, R. M., Tze‐Polo, L., & Titler, M. G. (2023). Barriers and facilitators influencing EBP readiness: Building organizational and nurse capacity. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing20(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12618

Fulop, N. J., & Ramsay, A. I. (2019). How organizations contribute to improving the quality of healthcare. BMJ365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1773

Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). Communication skills and transformational leadership style of first-line nurse managers in relation to job satisfaction of nurses and moderators of this relationship. In Healthcare (Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 346). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030346

Robbins, B., & Davidhizar, R. (2020). Transformational leadership in health care today. The Health Care Manager39(3), 117-121. Doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000296

Yoder-Wise, P. S., & Sportsman, S. (2022). Leading and Managing in Nursing E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8302 Assignment Organizational Culture Assessment Tool

Content

Name: NURS_8302_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

A fully completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

A mostly completed Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

An inaccurate or incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

An inaccurate and incomplete Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice selected is submitted, or it is missing.

Assess the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains and assesses the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Assess whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response accurately explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains an assessment of whether organizational culture is present for quality improvement, or it is missing.

Identify and assess leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality. Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response comprehensively assesses and fully identifies leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response identifies and assesses leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies, and may assess, the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the leadership strategies present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource