Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6521 Assignment Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

NURS 6521 Assignment Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

 

Week 2 Case Assignment

Patient Factor

I chose to focus on the patient factor of conduct, which is centered on the AO’s obesity. Obesity is a risk factor for both hypertension and hyperlipidemia, as well as for a variety of other conditions, such as diabetes, which can complicate treatment for cardiovascular problems. Two factors affecting this patient’s pharmacokinetics are helpless nourishment and a shorter course. It is reasonable to assume that this current patient’s sustenance is inadequate, as is often the case with obesity (Burchum & Rosenthal, 2017). Reduced circulation can be influenced by restricted physical activity, the vasoconstriction associated with hypertension, and the possibility of developing plaque in hyperlipidemia. With an awareness of these risk factors and the potential impact they may have on the patient’s ability to respond appropriately to a medication regimen and receive restorative treatment, the patient should be encouraged to adjust their eating habits and exercise habits as well, most notably through the recommendation of the DASH diet.

Improving the Drug Therapy Plan

NURS 6521 Assignment Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

NURS 6521 Assignment Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6521 Assignment Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

            There are a few regions for development in AO’s medication plan. Initially, beta-blockers are known to add to hyperlipidemia. Additionally, beta-blockers are not regularly utilized as a first-line treatment for hypertension. Getting this, the atenolol should be

suspended. Since the atenolol is being ended, hydralazine should also be ceased, as it should in a perfect world be given with a beta-blocker and a diuretic. Since the suggested first line of treatment for hypertension is diuretics, a portion of 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide should be started every day (Jiang & Lu, 2016).  This medication was chosen since thiazide diuretics are viewed as safe in diabetics, with a decrease in mortality from coronary illness and stroke. The dose was chosen because, however, they are viewed as sheltered and helpful; people with diabetes should be regulated thiazide diuretics at the most minimal conceivable portion. Though the patient is not a known diabetic, the person has many risk factors for the sickness, and it should be viewed as an undeniable chance that the patient either as of now has or will before long create diabetes (Quintana, Janszky, & Gigante, 2016). Simvastatin is a suitable decision for hyperlipidemia, as the statin drug class is the suggested first-line treatment and individual medication decision is directed by the cholesterol levels, which I was not given. NURS 6521 Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders Assignment

References

Burchum, J., & Rosenthal, L. (2017). Lehne’s Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurses and Physician Assistants – E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Jiang, S.-Z., & Lu, W. (2016). Obesity and hypertension. Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 30-35.

Quintana, H. K., Janszky, I., & Gigante, B. (2016). Diabetes, hypertension, overweight and hyperlipidemia and 7-day case-fatality in first myocardial infarction. IJC Metabolic & Endocrine, 30-35.

Name:  Assignment Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.