NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns Included After Question

As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?

In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE

Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.

  • Based on the scenarios provided:
    • Select onescenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
    • What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
    • Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.

THE LAB ASSIGNMENT

Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 11

Submit your Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Title: NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

BC is a 49-year-old woman who has been admitted to the emergency room with cardiac arrest. BC has advanced-stage cancer. She is with her husband and one of her children. Adequate health assessment data should be obtained from BC and her family members to develop an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. The nurse should obtain subjective data. This includes information about her symptoms, onset, severity, and alleviating, exacerbating, and relieving factors. The nurse should also obtain information about BC’s medical and surgical history. This includes information about any other chronic conditions apart from advanced cancer, hospitalizations, and surgeries (Giger & Haddad, 2020; Greer et al., 2020). Information about her current use of medications, allergies, and reproductive history should be obtained.

Objective data should also be obtained from BC. This includes vital signs and a comprehensive review of all the body systems to rule out any abnormalities. The nurse will use the objective data to validate BC’s complaints. laboratory and diagnostic investigations should also be ordered. They include a complete blood count, renal and liver function tests, electrolyte levels test, a chest x-ray, and an electrocardiogram (Giger & Haddad, 2020). The diagnostic and laboratory investigations will help confirm the diagnosis and rule out differential diagnoses.

I will respond to the case scenario by focusing on the provision of patient-centered care to BC. I will demonstrate professional behaviors such as active listening, empathy, and respecting BC’s values and preferences. I will seek her and her family’s input in the treatment decisions. I will also provide her with accurate and adequate information to aid informed decision-making. I will also ensure data privacy and confidentiality. BC’s information will only be shared after informed consent has been obtained from her (Chua et al., 2020; Gennari et al., 2021; Molina-Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2020). I will also be a proactive member of the interprofessional teams involved in her care to ensure the delivery of high-quality, safe, and efficient care.

 

 References

Chua, G. P., Pang, G. S. Y., Yee, A. C. P., Neo, P. S. H., Zhou, S., Lim, C., Wong, Y. Y., Qu, D. L., Pan, F. T., & Yang, G. M. (2020). Supporting the patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: What are their palliative care needs? BMC Cancer, 20(1), 768. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07239-9

Gennari, A., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Cortés, J., Azambuja, E. de, DeMichele, A., Dent, R., Fenlon, D., Gligorov, J., Hurvitz, S. A., Im, S.-A., Krug, D., Kunz, W. G., Loi, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Ricke, J., Robson, M., Rugo, H. S., Saura, C., … Harbeck, N. (2021). ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer☆. Annals of Oncology, 32(12), 1475–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019

Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. (2020). Transcultural Nursing – E-Book: Assessment and Intervention. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Greer, J. A., Applebaum, A. J., Jacobsen, J. C., Temel, J. S., & Jackson, V. A. (2020). Understanding and Addressing the Role of Coping in Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(9), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00013

Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of Nurse-Patient Relationship on Quality of Care and Patient Autonomy in Decision-Making. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Title: NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Case study 2 depicts a single father who accompanies his 17-year-old daughter to a women’s health clinic and requests a pregnancy test for his daughter. The daughter does not consent to the test and appears uneasy. Vital health assessment information required to establish if the girl is pregnant includes her menstrual history (Dyer et al., 2018). The nurse should inquire about the date of her last menstrual period (LMP), menstrual pattern, duration of her menses, and frequency. In addition, the nurse should obtain the client’s sexual history, including if she is sexually active, the contraceptives she uses, and the frequency of using contraceptives. The nurse should also gather information on presumptive signs of pregnancy, including amenorrhea, nausea, vomiting, generalized malaise, and breast tenderness (Gadsby et al., 2021).

This case presents an ethical dilemma since the girl’s father insists on a pregnancy test against her wish. The provider also has an ethical duty to promote the confidentiality of the patient’s information. Thus, I would ensure privacy when interviewing the girl in her father’s absence and assure her that the information she gives will be kept confidential. To address this ethical dilemma, I would observe the rule that the patient, in this case, is the girl and not the parent (Larcher & Brierley, 2018). Thus, I would only perform the pregnancy test if the girl consented. This is because conducting the test against the girl’s wish poses the risk of psychological harm.

Sharkey and Griffiths (2019) explain that children above 16 years are considered competent to consent to treatment, including pregnancy testing. Patients should be asked sensitively about the likelihood of pregnancy and offered a pregnancy test with their consent if there is doubt. If the girl continues to decline even after counseling her, I would inform her father that a pregnancy test cannot be conducted against the patient’s wish since it will violate her right to autonomy.

 

 References

Dyer, J., Latendresse, G., Cole, E., Coleman, J., & Rothwell, E. (2018). Content of First Prenatal Visits. Maternal and child health journal22(5), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2436-y

Gadsby, R., Ivanova, D., Trevelyan, E., Hutton, J. L., & Johnson, S. (2021). The onset of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03478-7

Larcher, V., & Brierley, J. (2018). Developing guidance for pregnancy testing of adolescents participating in research: ethical, legal and practical considerations. Archives of disease in childhood101(10), 980–983. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-310725

Sharkey, E., & Griffiths, S. (2019). The ethics of pregnancy testing. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine20(9), 511-514.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.06.006

Question

NURS6512 Advanced Health Assessment and Diagnostic Reasoning

Week 11 Assignment

Ethical Concerns

As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?

In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.

To Prepare

Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.

Based on the scenarios provided:

NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.

What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?

Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.

The Lab Assignment

Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns
NURS 6512 Week 11 Assignment Ethical Concerns

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.