NURS 6053 Module 3 Leadership Essay
Sample Answer for NURS 6053 Module 3 Leadership Essay Included After Question
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Leader in You [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze the effectiveness and impact of leadership skills
- Assess personal leadership traits
- Analyze how leadership traits can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors
- Develop a personal leadership philosophy
- Create a development plan related to personal leadership philosophies
| Due By | Assignment |
| Week 4, Days 1–2 | Read the Learning Resources. Compose your initial Discussion 1 post. |
| Week 4, Day 3 | Post your initial Discussion 1 post. Begin to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 4, Days 4-5 | Review peer Discussion 1 posts. Compose your peer Discussion 1 responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 4, Day 6 | Post two peer Discussion 1 responses. |
| Week 5, Days 1-2 | Compose your initial Discussion 2 post. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 5, Day 3 | Post your initial Discussion 2 post. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 5, Days 4-5 | Review peer Discussion 2 posts. Compose your peer Discussion 2 responses. Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 5, Day 6 | Post two peer Discussion 2 responses. |
| Week 6, Days 1- 6 | Continue to compose your Assignment. |
| Week 6, Day 7 | Deadline to submit your Assignment. |
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
- Chapter 1, “Frameworks for Becoming a Transformational Leader” (pp. 2–19 ONLY)
- Chapter 6, “Shaping Your Own Leadership Journey” (pp. 182-211)
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6053 Module 3 Leadership Essay
Resources for the StrengthsFinder Assessment Tool
Rath, T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0 – with Access Code.
Purchase the access code from the Walden bookstore. Then follow the instructions in the document “How to Access the Strengths Finder 2.0.
Document: How to Access Strengths Finder 2.0 (PDF)
Developing mission and vision statements in nursing needs effective reflection on the
intrinsic purpose in life. My mission and vision statement as a nurse leader is to model leadership
by example and enhance the emotional intelligence of others around me, especially subordinates
in the workplace. I believe that inspiring and motivating others to develop and attain their
potential allows leaders to succeed. Nurse leaders can demonstrate empathy to their subordinates
who translate the same to patients in care delivery. Through these aspects, nurses and other
providers create and maintain health work environment and achieve excellent care outcomes
while meeting organizational and team members’ needs. Imperatively, deployment of proper
skills in leadership and proficiency management of scarce resources in health promotion and
holistic care is critical and an essential part of my overall mission in nursing.
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Leadership [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
NURS 6053 Module 3 Leadership Essay Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6053_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||