Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6052 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

NURS 6052 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

EBP is highly dependent on the availability of empirical data in the healthcare community for decision-making. Since its formal introduction in the 1990s, EBP has continued to evolve in the fields of management, public policy formation, education, and nursing practice (Lavenberg, Cacchione, & Jayakumar, 2019). EBP is the most effective technique for resolving problems in a medical setting because it incorporates the best available evidence from well-designed systematic studies, values, and patient preferences, as well as clinicians’ discretion regarding patient care. EBP is a cross-professional model that promotes high probabilities of success and relies heavily on collaborative decision-making. Similarly, acceptance and application of EVP are contingent upon disparate actors at the federal, national, and indigenous levels. The four-fold objective is primarily focused on improving the patient experience, population health, the working lives of healthcare providers, and healthcare costs (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014). The fourfold objective is to redesign healthcare facilities in order to accomplish the aforementioned goals. However, a significant impediment to achieving these goals in the broader health sector is maintaining or reducing health care costs.

            All of the techniques used in EBP enable healthcare professionals to turn scientific outcomes into clinical practice. By the effective usage of writings searching abilities and the formal application of guidelines that guide evidence to evaluate investigation results, nurses and other healthcare providers can efficiently apply scientific information to clinical practice based on individual patient needs. It improves the efficiency of the clinical care provided by patients (Sikka, Morath, & Leape, 2015). In recent years, several healthcare organizations have been adopting evidence-based approaches to address clinical problems, which have a significant effect on patient care.

Population health

            EBP aims to inform populations about the determinants of wellbeing, the advantages, and disadvantages of particular therapies, cultural and environmental behaviors. In order to maintain an equal allocation of capital in order to accomplish particular objectives, which incorporate evidence-based approaches across the various communities (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014). The populations may be categorized by socio-economic background, the family, and person health condition help, and therefore, the allocation and delivery of health promotion services are balanced and effective. All evidence-based processes have specifically been designed to meet individual patient needs as opposed to sub-group shaping of health care patterns.

Costs

            A significant test for most healthcare offices is straightforwardly identified with the proportion of per capita costs of healthcare as it needs all healthcare uses to be caught, estimation of real costs, and ordering the costs to the healthcare market. The most widely recognized strategy used to gauge actual costs is limited and evaluating. In this way, for most healthcare foundations, it is a colossal test to give sheltered and quality healthcare administrations at lower healthcare costs (Lavenberg, Cacchione, & Jayakumar, 2019). When a foundation grasps the utilization of the most recent innovation to improve proficiency and latest treatment strategies as uncovered through evidence-based practice, the nature of care, just as the costs, naturally increments. NURS 6052 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

Work-life of healthcare providers

NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6052 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

            The key parts of a favorable healthcare condition should bolster the interprofessional collaboration effort. Interprofessional

collaboration has been confirming to improve persistent wellbeing results and the fulfillment of healthcare suppliers (Sikka, Morath, & Leape, 2015). It additionally diminishes supplier burnout and turnover rates, which advances staff efficiency. The three significant segments of such a domain incorporate the auxiliary and strategy components and effectively captivating the workforce in a shared dynamic.

References

Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider. Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573–576.

Lavenberg, J. G., Cacchione, P. Z., & Jayakumar, K. L. (2019). Impact of a Hospital Evidence‐Based Practice Center (EPC ) on Nursing Policy and Practice. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing.

Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: care, health, cost, and meaning in work. BMJ Qual Sa, 608–610. NURS 6052 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim Sample

Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

  • Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
  • Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

  • Patient experience
  • Population health
  • Costs
  • Work life of healthcare providers

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit your anaylsis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

· Patient experience
· Population health
· Costs
· Work life of healthcare providers

Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)

The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.

Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)

The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples.

Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)

The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.

The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)

The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.

The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.