NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Sample Answer for NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS Included After Question

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse Informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
  • Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3

Post a description of experiences or observations about how nurse informaticists and/or data or technology specialists interact with other professionals within your healthcare organization. Suggest at least one strategy on how these interactions might be improved. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain the impact you believe the continued evolution of nursing informatics as a specialty and/or the continued emergence of new technologies might have on professional interactions.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days, offering one or more additional interaction strategies in support of the examples/observations shared or by offering further insight to the

NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS
NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

thoughts shared about the future of these interactions.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

Search entries or author Filter replies by unreadUnread     Collapse replies Expand replies

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Title: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Although most nursing informatics work is done behind the scenes, it has a profound effect on many facets of our industry and daily lives. Healthcare data and information is collected and analyzed by nursing informaticists (NI) to monitor the effects of healthcare treatments. According to research (Threw, 2016). At work, I make regular use of NI for incident report tracking. The system keeps tabs on incidents like these, as well as those involving patient-to-staff and patient-to-patient violence. They monitor the frequency with which these events occur in order to determine which preventative measures are effective and which are not.

Incorrect medicine delivery is only one example of the kinds of medical mistakes that may be reduced because to NI’s efforts to enhance the healthcare system. It was NI who spearheaded the effort to improve our hospital’s medicine delivery procedures from the ground up (McGonigle & Mastrian et al., 2017). A patient’s wristband, patient record, and medicine label must all match before we may give them a dose of medication.

Our relationships with NI might be enhanced if we had a more direct channel for reporting problems with the EHR (EHR). While Point Click Care is a fantastic EHR, it does have a lot of nitpicky flaws that we’ve had to work around. Both myself and many of my coworkers find this very irritating. If we could more easily get in touch with the people in charge of our EHR, we could share our discoveries (and our disappointments) and work together to develop solutions.

In my opinion, the significance of NI expertise will increase in the next years. The field of NI has a lot of space to expand thanks to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and remote monitoring tools like fall detection gadgets and remote blood sugar monitors. This emphasizes the significance of having clear lines of communication between the frontline healthcare staff and the team responsible for the EHR’s development and the NI division.

References

Kassam, I., Nagle, L., & Strudwick, G. (2017). Informatics competencies for nurse leaders:

protocol for a scoping review. BMJ open, 7(12), e018855.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018855Links to an external site.

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

Threw, J. (2016, April 19). Big Data Means Big Potential, Challenges for Nurse Execs. Health Leaders.Retrieved from https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Title: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

How Nurse Informaticists or Data/ Technology Specialists Interact with Other Professionals in the Healthcare Organization

For the purposes of this paper, the technology or data specialist in this case will be referred to as the nurse informaticist. Any interaction between the nurse informaticist and the other professionals in the healthcare organization cannot be talked about if the role of the former has not been defined. The nurse informaticist is a relatively recent role for the advanced practice nurse and involves responsibility for all technological applications used in healthcare.

The informaticist professional is responsible for the seamless capturing of patient data, adherence to and enforcement of HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act), access to the technological systems and installation or upgrading of any of the systems such as the electronic health record or EHR system (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017; McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). Since the use of technology to capture patient data is already mandated by law, this means that the nurse informaticist must literally communicate with all the other healthcare professionals in the organization.

Continuous Education (CE)

Being the healthcare professional with both the technological and medical knowledge, the nurse informaticist is a valuable resources person who regularly gives presentations to staff on how systems are to be used. She teaches the applicability of the systems and their benefits to patients, staff, and the organization. This is one way in which she interacts with the other healthcare professionals in the organization.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

As she is the custodian of all the technological systems used in the healthcare organization, she is also the person responsible for designing and disseminating the standard operating procedures or SOPs to be used by all staff when accessing the technology systems. This means that she will also have to interact with the other staff through tools such as internal emails or memos.

Giving Individual Access or Passwords

The nurse Informaticists is the gatekeeper of all technological systems within the healthcare organization. These include principally the certified electronic health record technology or CEHRT system as well as the clinical decision support or CDS system. For any individual employee in the organization to have access to the system (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dieticians, and so on), they must be given a unique password by the nurse informaticist. She will therefore also interact with them individually at this level.

Troubleshooting

As the other healthcare professionals utilize the system functionalities such as the CPOE (computerized provider order entry), PDMS (patient data management system), BCMA (bar code medication administration), and eMAR (electronic medication administration record); they will encounter challenges here and there. The only resource person that they will consult first for troubleshooting will be the nurse informaticist. This is therefore yet another way in which she interacts with the other healthcare professionals.

New Technology Applications or Improvements (Project Management)

Last but not least, the nurse informaticist is responsible for any new project involving installation of a new system or upgrading of an existing one. This essentially makes them the project manager (Sipes, 2016). They will thus interact with the other healthcare professionals by informing them of the impending change and also educating them of the need for the same.

Future Outlook

One strategy for improving the above interactions is to strengthen the technology units taught in the basic courses for all healthcare professionals. This will enable them to see the nurse informaticist as a valuable resource and not as a nuisance. The continued evolution of nursing informatics will impact professional interactions in that data will play a very crucial role (Wang et al., 2018). The medium of communication will henceforth be electronic data.

 References 

Alotaibi, Y., & Federico, F. (2017). The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631Links to an external site.

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K.G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge, 4th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Nursing Informatics, 252-256. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-658-3-252Links to an external site.

Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T.A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019Links to an external site.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Title: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

My experiences and observations  

Nurse informaticists handle analyzing data to improve patient care, as well as implementing new patient care technologies. At the hospital, I currently work for we have an infection control team. They handle collaborating with the informatics nurses and designing programs to detect early signs of sepsis. We have a main nurse that stays on our unit daily to answer questions and make corrections to the programs as needed. The program itself is greatly beneficial but is not without its issues. Having someone that can be in person, to correct errors as they occur has shown an overall improvement with the program. They stay on the phone with the tech department for real-time awareness. The infection control nurse is a licensed nurse that helps to understand our issues while relaying with needs to be corrected to the team that is correcting the program. “Appropriate health information technology education is critical to ensure quality documentation, patient privacy, and safe healthcare” (Topaz, 2013).   

 My Suggestions and Strategies  

If I had to make one major suggestion to making this program more beneficial, it would be to have one main employee from each group trained as well. The infection nurse is only available Monday through Friday, 8 am-4 pm. If an issue arises outside of these hours, the floor nurses handle writing down the issue and hoping it gets corrected. If we always have a trained individual on staff, we can work together to ensure that all errors are corrected promptly. “A champion or superuser is recommended to maintain the momentum of the transformation and enculturation” (Kiel, 2016).   

 Impact of the Evolution of Nursing Informatics & New Technologies  

Healthcare has received help from the evolution of nursing informatics and innovative technologies. “In interprofessional health care teams, individuals with distinct professional training supply unique expertise and work together to solve health care problems” (Holden, 2018). With each new program, and addition to our care, we can supply better care to our patients. Patient care outcomes have benefited greatly from nursing informatics and the latest changes to our technology. Being able to detect and treat sepsis before it reaches a point of no return has awarded our unit many accommodations throughout the hospital. The proof of impact is in the outcomes of the programs. We need every area of specialty coming together to create a new world of healthcare.  

 

References  

Holden, R., Binkheder, S., Patel, J., & Viernes, S. (2018). Best Practices for Health Informatician Involvement in Interprofessional Health Care Teams. Applied clinical informatics, 9(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1626724 

Kiel, J. (2016). Using Organizational Development for Electronic Medical Record Transformation. The Health Care Manager, 35(4), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/hcm.0000000000000131 

 Topaz, M., Rao, A., Creber, M. & Bowles, K. (2013). Educating Clinicians on New Elements Incorporated into the Electronic Health Record. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 31(8), 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1097/nxn.0b013e318295e5a5 

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Title: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Thank you for sharing your experience with nursing informatics in your workplace for incident report tracking. Error prevention is of interest to healthcare staff as well as one of the main goals mentioned by the Institute of Medicine. Arguably error prevention can be reached by medical informatics (Duff et al, 2005). Incident reports and software can provide detailed records of events that do not meet best practice standards and can be used for efforts to improve patient care. The evolution of nursing informatics is important as “informatics will continue to support the need to apply the information and technology garnered from experience to advancing developments” (McGonigle and Mastrian, 2022, p. 612).

I’m curious what system is your healthcare organization using? At my previous workplace, they used a software performance platform called, Midas Healthcare Analytics solutions reporting system. This system is designed to collect data, guide users to draw insight, and offer solutions. From the data gathered in this software program, medical providers have assistance in the management of healthcare operations (Company: Conduent, 2022). An opportunity for the skills of nursing informatics would be essential in reviewing data and integrating findings in collaboration with nursing quality and leadership. This is only one example of an avenue that meets the significant demand for nurse informatics expertise and their abilities to teach and integrate these technologies to aid staff and improve patient care and experience. As the field of informatics develops perhaps the view of technology being an asset will become helpful and less disruptive. The irritations you describe are barriers that take away from the caring presence (McGonigle and Mastrian, 2022) I like your solution of advocacy in speaking up in collaborative efforts to make technology a tool and not a burden or distraction. Well done.

A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

Title: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

In 2020, my hospital unit experienced a 9% increased of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). One CAUTI can result in millions of deaths and billions of dollars added to the U.S. healthcare system (Whitaker & et al, 2022). Currently, the benchmark for CAUTI was listed under the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) website at 0 and my facility did not meet the expectation (CMS Issues Technical Update for Performance Standards Regarding Select Hospital VBP Program Measures, 2019). In order to meet the CDC standards of CAUTI prevention, the collection and assessment of electrical health record (EHR) data is the only effective means of solving the issues surrounding the CAUTI increase. The first step is to identify the data that provides the causes of CAUTI through chart audits on the appropriateness of catheter use, frequency of documented maintenance of perineal care and observation of insertions to validate aseptic technique used (Toolkit for Reducing Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections in Hospital Units: Implementation Guide, 2015).

After collecting the data, this knowledge retrieved will help the nurse leader such as charge nurses (CN), nurse educator (NE) or nurse manager (NM) to develop a clinical reasoning and professional judgement toward a solution. The nurse leaders collaborated with the EHR (Electric Health Record) tech team called EPIC and incorporated the CDC criteria alert for physicians before ordering a foley catheter. The Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America estimated 69% of CAUTI can be prevented by using the evidence-based strategies (EBS) published by the CDC (Bagley & Severud, 2021). The nurse leaders will focus on establishing hospital protocols influence by EBS and CAUTI-prevention bundles. CAUTI prevention bundles consist of hand hygiene, aseptic catheter insertion procedure, proper foley catheter maintenance and surveillance.

The nurse leaders will collaborate with physicians about nurse-driven protocol orders to set in place to ensure an Indwelling Urinary Catheter (IUC) is appropriately removed promptly when no longer needed to dramatically decrease the number of CAUTI (Bagley & Severud, 2021). The data collected from the EHR identified patients with CAUTI after having the medical device for more than 4 days. There was no appropriate clinical reasoning qualified under the CDC guidelines for each incidence to maintain a foley catheter in place. EBP shows that prolonged indwelling urinary catheterizations is a predominant risk factor for urinary tract infections (UTI) (Lilley et al., 2022). The EPIC tech team set up pop alerts to remind nurses after two days to review the foley criteria to ensure it is still appropriate for their patient. In addition, nurse leaders partnered up with an organization called Purewick, to help decrease CAUTI by using an alternate medical device. Purewick is a non-invasive medical device used in replace of foley catheter to absorb urine through cloth material and suction canister. Hospital units have reduced the use of foley catheters, which directly drop the rate of CAUTI’s. Thanks to the good professional judgement by the nurse leaders, the hospital have been meeting the CDC benchmark of zero CAUTI occurrences for the past 4 months and counting.

References                                    

Whitaker, A., Colgrove, G., Scheutzow, M., Ramic, M., Monaco, K., & Hill, J. L. (2022). Decreasing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) at a community academic medical center using a multidisciplinary team employing a multi-pronged approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Infection Controlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.08.006

Toolkit for reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in hospital units: Implementation guide. (2015, October). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/cauti-tools/guides/implguide-pt4.html  Links to an external site.

 CMS issues technical update for performance standards regarding select hospital VBP program measures. (2019). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). https://qualitynet.cms.gov/news/5d0150021543e8002ceb1d4d

Bagley, K., & Severud, L. (2021). Preventing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections with Incontinence Management Alternatives. Nursing Clinics of North America56(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2021.05.002

Lilley, T., Teixeira-Poit, S., Wenner, J., Pruitt, J., & Jenkins, M. (2022). Reducing CAUTI in patients with acute urinary retention in the critical care setting: A pilot study with electronic medical record analytics. American Journal of Infection Controlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.06.005

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week03_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting
50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

Posts main post by day 3.

0 pts

Poor

Does not post by day 3.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response
18 to >16.0 pts

Excellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 pts

Good

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 pts

Poor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response
17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 pts

Good

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 pts

Fair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
5 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 pts

Poor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS

NURS 6051 INTERACTION BETWEEN NURSE INFORMATICISTS AND OTHER SPECIALISTS Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also:  NURS 6051 HEALTHCARE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TRENDS