Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

RE: Discussion – Week 10

Walden University offers a variety of nursing specialties from which scholars can choose based on their desired career path. Walden’s online programs for nursing meet rigorous standards for academic quality and integrity, and the College of Nursing didactic faculty all hold doctorates (Walden, n.d.). The staff of Walden including the academic and student success advisors are dedicated to ensuring that you have made the right choice in a specialty in the Master’s program. Choosing Education as my specialty was a no-brainer for me. While pursuing my Bachelor’s degree, I excelled in my Nursing courses and that lead me to start tutoring other students that were struggling in various courses. While tutoring, it inspired me to want to become a Nursing school professor which is one of the reasons I decided to pursue my Master’s degree. Knowing how hard it was to obtain my Nursing degree, I knew I wanted to be a part of making the journey easier for future students. The United States is currently experiencing a nursing professor shortage. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, U.S Nursing schools turned down 80,407 qualified applicants from baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs (AACN, 2020).

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

Program Specialty 

As a nurse, I want to give back and provide education and mentorship to students the same way I received it. I’ve always enjoyed

teaching and offering tips that help other students and coworkers succeed. Being a nurse, you are always learning throughout your career and that is one of the reasons I decided to be a nurse. Helping people who feel that certain tasks or concepts are challenging is so fulfilling to me. Since I am a new graduate Nurse, I am unsure about what my end goal is for my career. I’ve struggled back and forth in deciding if I wanted to be a Nurse Practitioner in the future. Knowing that I wanted to be an Educator indefinitely, I decided to pursue that career path first, and then if I decided I want to be an NP I could pursue that as well.

                                         Professional Organization 

Joining a professional organization is crucial for advancing and expanding your nursing career. These affiliations give several possibilities for networking and learning practices that can add to your nursing and leadership responsibilities. It is the responsibility of the organization’s board leader to promote the most current and relevant professional development options in order to support and influence the organization’s members (Cherry, 2019). Finding a reputable and accredited organization that complements your personal goals and development is essential. As stated previously, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing is a professional body that is linked with my Education speciality. This association strives to develop excellent standards for nursing education and encourages public support for nursing research, education, and practice (AACN, n.d.). To join this organization, you must submit an application on behalf of your whole teacher and student body. As a future educator, I would recommend that the institution where I will teach join this association. This membership assures that students and staff receive the appropriate and high-quality education required to serve the modern population. I aim to become a member of this society one day by completing an exclusive and accredited nursing program.NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties Sample

                                                   References

AACN. (2020). News & Information. Retrieved October 21, 2020, from https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-information/fact-sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage

Cherry, Barbara, DNSc, MBA, RN, NEA-BC, Caramanica, Laura, PhD, RN, CNE, CENP, et al. (2019). Leveraging the Power of Board Leadership in Professional Nursing Organizations. Journal of Nursing Administration, 49, 517-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000805

Walden University. (2020). Nursing Program. Retrieved November 01, 2020, from https://www.waldenu.edu/programs/nursing

Chanel,

Thanks for your post. I am pursuing my Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) with a specialty in nursing education. As you mentioned, there is a nursing professor shortage. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports a 17% increase in demand for nurse educators through 2029 (Walden University, n.d.). This is one of the many reasons I felt a calling to return to school for a MSN. Many well qualified students are turned away due to lack of faculty in nursing schools (Shipman & Hooten, 2008). This disturbs me and drives me to recruit other great nurses to become involved in academic teaching.

Joining a professional organization is a great way to continue your professional development and network with other colleagues in your specialty. You mentioned the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and joining requirements are for institutions to apply and includes memberships for all faculty and students. The AACN is a wonderful organization if you are affiliated with an institution with membership. If you are not, I would recommend joining the National League of Nurses. This organization allows individual membership at a low cost of $80 per year. Membership benefits include their publication “Nursing Education Perspectives” which includes research articles on the advancement of nurse education (NLN, n.d.). NURS 6003 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

Good luck on your journey, Chanel.

References

National League of Nurses (NLN). (n.d.). Membership Services. Retrieved on November 2, 2020, from https://www.nln.org/membership

Shipman, D., & Hooten, J. (2008). Without enough nurse educators there will be a continual decline in RNs and the quality of nursing care: Contending with the faculty shortage. Nurse Education Today, 28, 521-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.03.001

Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing: Nursing Education. Retrieved on November 2, 2020, from https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/master-of-science-in-nursing/msn-nursing-education

Module 6 (Weeks 10-11): Standards of Practice

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Standards of Practice [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Standards of Practice [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Final Thoughts [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Learning Objectives

Students will:
  • Analyze difficulties in determining nursing specializations
  • Compare nursing specialties
  • Justify selection of MSN specialization
  • Analyze nursing specialization professional organization engagement strategies
  • Create Academic Success and Professional Development Plans

Due By
Assignment
Week 10, Days 1–2

Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 10, Day 3

Post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose Part 6 of your Assignment.
Week 10, Days 4-5

Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses.
Continue to compose Part 6 of your Assignment.
Week 10, Day 6
Post two peer Discussion responses.
Week 10, Day 7
Wrap up discussion.
Week 11, Days 1-4
Continue to compose Part 6 of your Assignment.
Week 11, Day 5
Deadline to submit Part 6 of your Assignment.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Bickford, C. J., Marion, L., & Gazaway, S. (2015). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice, third edition – 2015. Retrieved from http://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/12524

Cherry, B., Caramanica, L, Everett, L. Q., Fennimore, L., & Elaine, S. (2019). Leveraging the power of board leadership in professional nursing organizations. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 517-519.

Truant, R., & Chan, R. J. (2017). Future ready: Strengthening oncology nursing leadership in the context of professional oncology nursing organizations. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal, 27(1), 2-4.

Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://www.waldenu.edu/masters/master-of-science-in-nursing

Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

Choose among the following to review your specialization’s Scope and Standards of Practice or Competencies:

  • “The Scope of Nursing Informatics Practice: Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics” (pp. 18–39)

Nursing Education

Website: Competencies for the Academic Nurse Educator
National League for Nursing. (2019). Nurse educator core competency. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/competencies-for-nursing-education/nurse-educator-core-competency
Note: The competencies for the Academic Nurse Educator do not encompass the competencies or scope and standards of practice for the Nursing Professional Developer. The set of competencies associated with that specific role within the Nurse Education specialization will be examined in future competencies throughout your specialization program of study.

Nurse Executive

Website: Nurse Executive Competencies
American Organization for Nursing Leadership. (2015). AONL Nurse Executive competencies. Retrieved from https://www.aonl.org/resources/nurse-leader-competencies

Website: Public Health Nursing Competencies
Quad Council Coalition. (2018). Community/Public Health Nursing [C/PHN] competencies. Retrieved from http://www.quadcouncilphn.org/documents-3/2018-qcc-competencies/

American Nurses Association. (2013). Public health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Author.

Discussion: Examining Nursing Specialties

You have probably seen one or more of the many inspirational posters about decisions. A visual such as a forked road or a street sign is typically pictured, along with a quote designed to inspire.

Decisions are often not so easily inspired. Perhaps you discovered this when choosing a specialty within the MSN program. This decision is a critical part of your plan for success, and you no doubt want to get it right. This is yet another area where your network can help, as well as other sources of information that can help you make an informed choice.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on your decision to pursue a specialty within the MSN program, including your professional and academic goals as they relate to your program/specialization.

By Day 3 of Week 10

Post an explanation of your choice of a nursing specialty within the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your choice, and the factors that drove/are driving your decision. Identify at least one professional organization affiliated with your chosen specialty and provide details on becoming a member.

By Day 6 of Week 10

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by sharing your thoughts on their specialty, supporting their choice or offering suggestions if they have yet to choose.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 10 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 10

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 10 Discussion

RE: Discussion – Week 10

Hi Chanel,

I commend you for knowing your desired MSN path you want to pursue early on in your nursing career. It sounds like you do have a great passion for teaching. As you have mentioned in your post, qualified undergraduate and graduate nursing applicants are being turned away due to faculty shortages as the top reason (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2020). As the demand for nurses is continually increasing, this is a genuine concern (BLS, n.d.).  To produce trained nurses, committed nurse educators are a crucial necessity (Gleeson, M., 2020).

Just like you, I also had difficulty deciding which MSN track I would pursue. I struggled between the family nurse practitioner and nursing informatics track. Considering the nature of the job that I will eventually take on after graduation, was a significant factor in determining the best choice. With your willingness to provide genuine guidance and offer constructive feedback to others, you will achieve great things in your chosen MSN career path (Valiga, T. & Thornlow, D., 2018). Good luck on your academic and professional journey. I wish you the best.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2020). Nursing Faculty Shortage. Aacnnursing.Org. https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/Fact-Sheets/Nursing-Faculty-Shortage

Gleeson, M. (2020). Institutions Innovate to Fill the National Shortage of Nurse Educators. INSIGHT into Diversity94(4/5), 58–60.

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (n.d.). Table 8. Occupations with the largest projected number of job openings due to growth and replacement needs, 2012 and projected 2022. Www.Bls.Gov. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.t08.htm

Valiga, T., Thornlow, D. (2018). What to consider when choosing a graduate nursing program. Nursing, 48, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000527614.67902.8e

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6003_Module06_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.
Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module06_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

Walden University MSN Core Nursing courses – Generic information for success:

  1. Being graduate level adult learners – It is very unlikely that you will experience the quantity of or detailed guidance as in the announcements received in this course. Being so: Read the course announcements thoroughly and completely. Read the course announcements at least daily for any updates. Going forward the Instructors may post items at any time throughout the day or night. I have unfortunately received emails throughout this course with questions for which the information was previously addressed within the announcements. Again, reading the course announcements is imperative for your success.
  2. The utilization requirement of APA within assignments will increase as you progress to courses that are considered “writing intense”. The APA requirement within discussions will remain as you experienced within this course. This course is not considered writing intense. Familiarize yourself with the correct usage of APA 7th edition. It is within every graded item, within every Nursing course going forward. Familiarize yourself and utilize the Walden resources for APA assistance. I have diligently posted links to those resources several times during this course.
  3. Use ONLY your Walden student email for communication with any Walden University representative. When communicating with your Instructor ALWAYS include your course number and section. Within this course I posted in the announcements numerous times your specific course number and section, as well asked that you include that information when emailing me. Sadly, I received emails that did not include this information, this delayed my assisting you as I had to request your course number and section. This alerts me that course announcements were not being thoroughly and completely reviewed. Going forward it is highly unlikely Instructors will respond to any email other than your Walden student email as email not in Walden origin routinely gets flagged as spam then deleted. Also be fully aware that Instructors required to respond to any email other than your designated Walden Student email.
  4. Be mindful if you do not participate in any Walden course during the 1st week (Day 1 through Day 7) – you will be removed from the course by Walden University regardless of your excuse. Your Instructor has no control over this – it is university policy!
  5. The grading of any assignment cannot proceed by your Instructor unless you submit your assignments via SafeAssign, then in BlackBoard. Traditionally a -0- score will be awarded, with no resubmission availability. At the Graduate level, you are responsible for your work being submitted per instructions AND grading rubric parameters and due date/time. Again, I strongly encourage you to submit your assignments before Day 7 to ensure yourself sufficient time to seek assistance and correct the issue. Remember SafeAssign Drafts and SafeAssign are different!
  6. For Discussions – There is a six (6) day period (Monday, Day 1 through Saturday, Day 6) allowed for the Discussion participation. No allowances for participation will be made outside of the six (6) Discussion active period. Any submitted post outside of the 6-day active discussion period will not be graded and you will receive a -0- score.
  7. Faculty cannot accept or grade any assignment or discussion through email.
  8. Do not wait until Day 7 to begin or submit your assignment. Assignments are due Day 7. At the Graduate level, you are responsible for your work being submitted per instructions, grading rubric parameters and due date and time. Being so = I strongly encourage you to submit your assignments well before Day 7 to ensure yourself sufficient time to seek assistance and correct any issue encountered. I have purposely made myself available to you each day including weekends and responded to you within 12 to 24 hours. Be mindful, Instructors are not required to respond to you on a daily basis. Going forward your Instructors will respond to your Contact the Instructor communications and emails within the required 48 hours’ time period.
  9. As a graduate level student, Instructors will not reach out to you to ensure your assignments/discussions are completed and submitted correctly. As a graduate level adult learner, it is your responsibility to ensure that your discussions and assignments are completed and submitted timely and correctly. As an adult learner, you need to take the initiative and reach out to your Instructor immediately when you encounter an issue. You were offered an online orientation by Walden University – Did you participate in that orientation? If not, I strongly suggest you contact your advisor and make arrangements.
  10. If you experience technical issues, please utilize your resources and contact the Walden Customer Care Team or Walden IT for assistance. Going forward you will encounter several PowerPoint presentations, Walden Templates within your future courses at Walden University, as well be required to submit multiple items with a single submission.
  11. Understand the Time Zones at Walden University and the applicable conversion. Your course calendar is in Eastern Time as is the time/date stamp of submission/participation for your discussions and assignments. Going forward all of your future Nursing courses require that your Discussions, any Quiz or Assignment will continue to be due submitted in Mountain Time.
  12. Have a computer and Internet backup plan. What will you do if your computer crashes or your Internet is not working?  Computer/Internet/work issues are your responsibility. Allowances will not be made due to these issues causing a lack of participation or missed deadline, rather a -0- score will be awarded. Save your work on a flash or hard drive. Know where you can go to access the Academic Skills Center as it is an excellent resource to assist in your success.
  13. For Assignments – Only prior communication with AND Instructor approval will late assignments be considered for grading. Assignments submitted late will be deducted 4% daily until Day 5 OR may deduct the entire 20% regardless of time/day of late submission. This is at the discretion of each Instructor and will vary course-by-course. After Day 5, in any course, the assignment will be scored a -0-.
  14. Be familiar with how to access and utilize the Walden resources. I posted the most useful and frequently utilized resources numerous times within the course announcements.
  15. Ensure your discussions have a substance, depth and breadth, critical analysis, and reflection element within the grading rubric. In short – if your discussion Main Post does not closely compare to the discussion exemplar located within the course resources and announcements posted within this course your grade will be drastically reduced.
  16. Know who and where to submit any documentation if necessary, for allowances for any late or missed assignments. Remember Instructors are not permitted to accept any medical documentation.
  17. Know who your advisor is and how to contact them.
  18. Know where and how to locate your student feedback. This course is 6 weeks in duration – In Week 5 I received emails inquiring as to “I see my grade but don’t know why points were deducted” – It was sadly apparent the feedback being provided was not being reviewed by those students. Your numeric score and student feedback are in different locations – this was addressed in the course announcements. If you cannot locate or have not located your student feedback for discussions and assignments – I strongly encourage you to contact the Customer Care Team as you have missed a tremendous amount of information.
RE: Discussion – Week 10

Initial Post

I have been an RN(ADN) for approximately 20 years, and I have seen many changes in healthcare. I was working in the ICU and decided I needed a better work life balance. So, I took a job as a clinic float nurse. I was able to still have some variety, provide direct patient care, patient education, assistance with procedures, IV starts, and foleys. I eventually stopped floating and starting work in one department where I was able to still have direct patient care and room patients. As nursing has changed within the organization that I work, RNs no longer room ( now MA and LPNs do) and most of my work time is spent on the phone triaging patients, calling results, and refilling medications. I have very little direct patient care. I enjoy and I miss direct patient contact and providing education. With the lack of direct RN patient care, I have witnessed the negative impacted it has had on patient care and outcomes. Patients and families are not receiving culturally competent care or the information and education that is needed to better manage their care and/or  make informed decisions. I am all for providing culturally competent care and treating the whole person mind body and spirit. I decided I wanted to make a difference, provide direct patient care, and improve healthcare disparities. I felt like the FNP was the most versatile and will allow to do so. According to Walden University (n.d.) the online FNP program focuses on evidence-based techniques that can enhance the quality of care and patient outcomes.

I did not have any difficulties in making may choice. I am excited to see where this journey goes and the impact I will make on healthcare and improving disparities.

Joining a professional nursing organization is needed for lifelong learning, develop and maintain competence, enhance nursing practice, and support the achievement of career goals (Gaines, 2019, para.2). One professional organization that would be beneficial for FNPs is the American Association for Nurse Practitioners ® (AANP). The AANP’s mission is to empower all NPs to advance quality health care through practice, education, advocacy, research, and leadership. To become a member requires a membership application and an annual membership fee. AANP membership offers free CE activities, current health care topics, advocate at state and national levels,  and resources for professional growth.

References

Gaines , K. (2019, October 11). You should join a nursing organization. here’s why. Nurse.org. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from https://nurse.org/articles/benefits-of-nursing-organizations/.

 Join AANP or renew your membership – american association of nurse practitioners. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://my.aanp.org/logincreate?appUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmy.aanp.org%2FJoinRenewMembership.aspx.

 Master of science in nursing (MSN). Walden University. (n.d.). Retrieved November 2, 2021, from https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/master-of-science-in-nursing.

Name: NURS_6003_Module06_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.