HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?

Sample Answer for HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?Included After Question

 A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?

Title: HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?

 

HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?

Topic 3 DQ 2

Apr 21-25, 2022

It is important to ensure that a candidate fits into the culture of the organization. What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization? What message is sent to candidates about the interview process and selection methods of an organization? Clarify how HR can ensure any pre-employment assessments used are not inherently biased.

REPLY TO DISCUSSION

VO

Victoria Oleka

Posted Date

Apr 27, 2022, 7:21 PM

Unread

Topic 3 DQ 2

It is important to ensure that a candidate fits into the culture of the organization. What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization? What message is sent to candidates about the interview process and selection methods of an organization? Clarify how HR can ensure any pre-employment assessments used are not inherently biased.

Significant changes in technology over the past decade are having a profound impact on recruiting strategies, with staffing professionals increasingly using social networking sites to source, contact and screen both active and passive job candidates. This method uses different strategies, and tools to interview employees, in order to get the human resource talents, they are looking for. Why do organizations follow these patterns? The different organizations have their own vision, mission, and culture they want to pass onto the new members coming into the organizations. Therefore, (Dessler, 2013) had emphasized that organizations must also have a very clear description of the positions

HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization
HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization

they are hiring for, in order to know what candidates, they will be hunting for, during the hiring process. Therefore, to find cultural fitment, organizations must screen candidates, based on psychometric tests and behavioral interview, role plays, and case studies.

The processes most employers use to find and select the best talent possible for an open position include the following:

  • Posting open positions on career sites to solicit resumes and employment applications.
  • Pre-screening to eliminate candidates who do not meet the basic requirements of the position.
  • Using a preliminary assessment to screen out those who lack the desired level of skills and competencies for the job.
  • Performing an in-depth assessment through interviews and job simulations to select candidates with the highest potential for job success.
  • Verifying candidates’ stated employment record and qualifications.

There are also other different ways candidates can be interviewed, and there are:

Applicant tracking and resume management: With the new applicant tracking systems, companies are increasingly moving their historically paper-based compliance forms online, creating a number of new efficiencies. When everything is done electronically, all the relevant information is already in the system, if there is an audit. This automation also results in cost and time savings by reducing the amount of paper contained in new-hire packets.

Pre-Screening of Candidates: The pre-screening process typically begins with the review of a candidate’s employment application and resume, followed by a telephone interview. A recent trend among some organizations is to use a candidate’s social networking profile as a tool in the screening process.

Telephone interviews: Phone interviews are a quick, lower-cost alternative to conducting a first-round interview in person. An initial phone conversation can give the employer a wealth of information about a candidate’s overall communication skills, sense of humor, ability to listen, attitude and professionalism. During the call, employers first try to determine if a candidate has the right education, experience and knowledge to do the job. They also focus on the prospect’s motivation for applying for a particular job to make sure he or she has realistic expectations.

As a general rule, state and federal equal opportunity laws prohibit pre-employment inquiries that disproportionately screen out members based on protected status unless some business purpose justifies the questions. The EEOC and state agencies take the position that the information obtained through pre-employment inquiries should be aimed solely at determining qualifications without regard to criteria based on irrelevant, non-job-related factors. Selection decisions should be well supported and based on a person’s qualifications for the position. Accordingly, agencies have viewed inquiries that reveal information bearing no relationship to the job qualifications (e.g., year of graduation from high school, child care arrangements, country of origin) as evidence of an employer’s discriminatory intent. Questions regarding criminal history may also be regulated.

Applicant tracking and resume management

Technology can reduce the time it takes busy hiring managers to screen job candidates. Many companies use an online application process that includes behavioral assessment tools that have been internally validated. The goal is to adopt a robust and efficient hiring system that saves managers time, results in improved quality of hire and drives cost savings through a reduction in paper.

With the new applicant tracking systems, companies are increasingly moving their historically paper-based compliance forms online, creating a number of new efficiencies. When everything is done electronically, all the relevant information is already in the system if there is an audit. This automation also results in cost and time savings by reducing the amount of paper contained in new-hire packets.

Pre-Screening of Candidates: The pre-screening process typically begins with the review of a candidate’s employment application and resume, followed by a telephone interview. A recent trend among some organizations is to use a candidate’s social networking profile as a tool in the screening process.

Telephone interviews

Phone interviews are a quick, lower-cost alternative to conducting a first-round interview in person. An initial phone conversation can give the employer a wealth of information about a candidate’s overall communication skills, sense of humor, ability to listen, attitude and professionalism. During the call, employers first try to determine if a candidate has the right education, experience and knowledge to do the job. They also focus on the prospect’s motivation for applying for a particular job to make sure he or she has realistic expectations.

Pre-employment testing

The purpose of employee testing is to help the employer predict how well an individual will perform on the job. Hiring the wrong people can be expensive, and selection errors can have a negative impact on employee morale and management time, waste valuable training and development dollars, and reduce employee productivity and a company’s profitability. According to the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures of 1978 issued by the EEOC, any employment requirement an employer uses is considered a “test.” As a result, there is the potential for litigation if a selection decision is challenged and determined to be discriminatory or in violation of state or federal regulations. Therefore, HR professionals must ensure that the selection process—and any procedures related to other employment decisions—are reliable, valid, equitable, legal and cost-effective.

Preliminary Assessment of Eligible Candidates

Preliminary assessment of candidates can be conducted through in-person interviews, structured panel interviews, video interviews or any combination of the three.

In-person interviews

The three key goals of employment interviews are to find out as much as possible about what the candidates know, to learn how they have applied and tested work skills, and to determine where their aptitudes lie, thereby defining the path of future growth and development. Ideally, each of the 10 to 12 questions interviewers ask during a typical one-hour interview, should provide the most insight on the candidates’ knowledge, skills and abilities. Scrutinizing interview questions before using them can help improve their strength and effectiveness and ensure that the interviewer and the candidate get the most out of their conversation.

Pre-employment testing

The purpose of employee testing is to help the employer predict how well an individual will perform on the job. Hiring the wrong people can be expensive, and selection errors can have a negative impact on employee morale and management time, waste valuable training and development dollars, and reduce employee productivity and a company’s profitability. According to the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures of 1978 issued by the EEOC, any employment requirement an employer uses is considered a “test.” As a result, there is the potential for litigation if a selection decision is challenged and determined to be discriminatory or in violation of state or federal regulations. Therefore, HR professionals must ensure that the selection process—and any procedures related to other employment decisions—are reliable, valid, equitable, legal and cost-effective.

Preliminary Assessment of Eligible Candidates

Preliminary assessment of candidates can be conducted through in-person interviews, structured panel interviews, video interviews or any combination of the three.

In-person interviews

The three key goals of employment interviews are to find out as much as possible about what the candidates know, to learn how they have applied and tested work skills, and to determine where their aptitudes lie, thereby defining the path of future growth and development. Ideally, each of the 10 to 12 questions interviewers ask during a typical one-hour interview should provide the most insight on the candidates’ knowledge, skills and abilities. Scrutinizing interview questions before using them can help improve their strength and effectiveness and ensure that the interviewer and the candidate get the most out of their conversation

Video interviews: Over the past decade, widespread technological advances in teleconferencing, video recording and streaming media have occurred. Video interviewing allows long-distance candidates to be more viable. Unlike conducting a phone interview or reading a resume, a video interview lets the employer observe candidates’ body language and how they answer questions; however, its key advantage is a reduction in travel costs and a more efficient use of time for both the recruiter and candidates, as we all had during the Covid-19 pandemic.

In-Depth Assessment: Depending on a particular position, in-depth assessment may be necessary to ensure the individual has the necessary skills and competencies to perform the job.

As a general rule, state and federal equal opportunity laws prohibit pre-employment inquiries that disproportionately screen out members based on protected status, unless some business purpose justifies the questions. The EEOC and state agencies take the position that any information obtained through pre-employment inquiries, should be aimed solely at determining qualifications without regard to criteria based on irrelevant, non-job-related factors. Selection decisions should be well supported and based on a person’s qualifications for the position. Accordingly, agencies have viewed inquiries that reveal information bearing no relationship to the job qualifications (e.g., year of graduation from high school, child care arrangements, country of origin) as evidence of an employer’s discriminatory intent. Questions regarding criminal history may also be regulated.

HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization
HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization

References:

Doll, J. L. (2017). Structured interviews: Developing interviewing skills in human resource management courses. Management Teaching Review, 3(1), 46-61.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298117722520

EEOC. (Feb. 4, 1987). EEOC Policy Statement on the Issue of Conviction Records under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982).

Dessler, G. (2016). Human resource management (15th ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN-13: 9780134235455

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 2 What pre-employment selection methods can be used to find the best candidate that fits the culture of the organization?

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: HRM 635 Topic 3 DQ 1 standard interview question