Explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships NUR 550
Explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships NUR 550
Topic 1 DQ 2
The establishment of the Inter-Professional Education Collaborative approach by six national associations in 2009 signaled the beginning of increased collaboration among various healthcare professions and professionals. Since then, these organizations have collaborated to define interprofessional collaboration around four core competencies: values and ethics, roles and responsibilities, interprofessional collaboration communication practices, and interprofessional collaboration teamwork (Patel et al., 2017). As history demonstrates, developing strong interprofessional relationships fosters collaboration and improves patient outcomes by implying that health care teams collaborate to provide better care through increased communication and understanding of their respective roles and responsibilities.
Collaboration improves patient outcomes by minimizing avoidable adverse events, lowering mortality and morbidity, and optimizing medication dosage. Collaboration has a number of advantages, including the reduction of additional workload and an increase in overall patient satisfaction (Guraya & Barr, 2018). Accountability, discipline, coordination, and a clear purpose all contribute to the success of any multidisciplinary medical team. Individuals can form interprofessional teams and collaborate to support initiatives and improve patient outcomes in a variety of ways. These include effective communication and the development of shared values and ethics in order to facilitate accountability and teamwork.

Team members should prioritize doing what is best for patients, which requires them to emerge from their professional cocoons and collaborate to improve outcomes and delivery of care. The emergence of new health delivery models and ongoing reforms in response to increased demand and population diversity imply that collaboration and teamwork will remain critical components of effective patient care delivery. The emphasis on fostering collaboration across healthcare professions will enable practitioners to provide the best care possible using evidence-based practice interventions. demonstrate how systems thinking assists leaders in developing strong interprofessional and organizational relationships
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON Explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships
Explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships NUR 550 References
Guraya, S. Y., & Barr, H. (2018). The effectiveness of inter-professional education in healthcare:
a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 34(3), 160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.12.009.
Patel, G. T., Brisolara, K. F., Davis, A. H., & Moore, R. (2017). Aligning inter-professional
education collaborative sub-competencies to a progression of learning. Journal of Inter-Professional Care, 31(3), 394-396. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1285273. explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships
Explain how systems thinking helps leaders to build strong interprofessional and organizational relationships NUR 550 Grading Rubric Guidelines
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |