NR 506 Week 3 Discussion:

ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

Sample Answer for ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies Included After Question

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity: 

  • Textbook: Chapter 3; pp. 100-107 
  • Lesson 
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (one of the listed pro-position articles) 

Apply the following writing resources to your posts: 

Initial Post Instructions 

Part 1: Research & Review
Choose one of the following pro articles to review and discuss with your classmates. If you have a different pro article you would like to use, please discuss it with your professor in advance. All articles can be found in our library databases. 

Topics  Pro-Position Articles 
Patient Portals  Alpert, J.M., Krist, A.H., Aycock, R.A. & Kreps, G.L. (2017, March). Designing user-centric patient portals: Clinician and patients’ uses and gratificationsLinks to an external site.. Telemedicine Journal And E-Health: The Official Journal Of The American Telemedicine Association, 23 (3), 248-253.  
Cosmetic Surgery  Jacono, A., Chastant, R.P. & Dibelius, G. (2016). Association of patient self-esteem with perceived outcome after face-lift surgeryLinks to an external site.. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 18(1), 42-46.  
Cost of Cancer  Newcomer, L. (2014, October). Myths and realities in cancer care: Another point of view. Health Affairs, 33(10), 1805-1807Links to an external site..  
Surrogacy  Jadva, V., Imrie, S. & Golombok, S. (2015, February). Surrogate mothers 10 years on: a longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and childLinks to an external site.. Human Reproduction, 30(2), 373-379.  
Organ Donation  Ralph, A., Chapman, J.R., Gillis, J., Craig, J.C., Butow, P., Howard, K….Tong, A. (2014, April). Family perspectives on deceased organ donation: thematic synthesis of qualitative studiesLinks to an external site.. American Journal Of Transplantation: Official Journal Of The American Society Of Transplantation And The American Society Of Transplant Surgeons, 14(4), 923-935.  
Private Hospitalization  MacAllister, L., Bellanti, D. & Sakallaris, B.R. (2016). Exploring inpatients’ experiences of healing and healing spaces: A mixed methods studyLinks to an external site.. Journal Of Patient Experience, 3(4), 119-130. (Click on View Record in DOAJ to access full text.) 
Workplace stress  Davenport, T.O. (2015). The good stress strategy: How managers can transform stress into fulfillmentLinks to an external site.. Employment Relations Today (Wiley), 42 (3), 9-20.  

Part 2: Application

Evaluate how effective the article’s argument was using Toulmin’s model. Detail as many of the 6 components as possible: 

  1. Claim: What was the article’s main point? What’s the thesis? 
  1. Grounds: What kinds of evidence did the author use to support his/her argument? Provide an example. 
  1. Warrants: Did the author(s) successfully connect the evidence to the main point? How so? 
  1. Backing: How credible were the sources the author(s) applied? How does credulity affect your overall response? 
  1. Qualifiers: Did you notice any absolutes (all, every, each) or limiters (some, several, many)? How did they add or subtract from the argument? 
  1. Rebuttal: Did the author(s) present any points of opposition and counterarguments? How did it influence your reaction?Note: If a section is missing completely from an article, spend of time discussing how its absence affects the overall success of the argument. 

How will you apply a similar approach in your pro-position papers? Based on this assessment, what must you include and what can you avoid in your own argument development? 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

Follow-Up Post Instructions

Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Here, we have an opportunity to compare research notes with our fellow peers. 

  • Did your peers discover something you missed? 
  • Do you agree with the stance in this article? If so, what other warrants or grounds might you add to validate the argument? If not, what qualifiers or rebuttals might you present to disprove the argument? 

Remember, the goal here is to find multiple perspectives, but those perspectives should be both professional and respectful. Ask questions to keep the conversation going. 

Note: If you see that someone has already received feedback from two peers, please choose to help a peer who has yet to obtain feedback. 

Writing Requirements 

  • Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up) 
  • Initial Post Length: minimum of 3 college-level paragraphs 
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references 

Grading

This activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Please review the following link: 

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4 

Due Date for Initial Post: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
Due Date for Follow-Up Posts: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday 

Hello All, 

Welcome to Week 2! You may begin posting on March 9 credit. We will be discussing Argumentative Strategies this week. For this discussion, you are choosing from a list of Pro-Position articles and evaluating how effective the article’s argument was using Toulmin’s model. Specifically, you are looking for the claim, grounds, warrants, backing, qualifiers, and rebuttal. 

You’ve already started thinking about your own strategies for your pro-position arguments. You even began outlining and drafting the pro-position paper and may have used the Toulmin model to create that basic outline. 

When we think about good argumentation, we are considering how persuasive it is. Did the author present solid claims, back those claims, provide research to support key points, offer a counterargument, and then explain why the counter falls short? 

Aside from the textbook reading assigned for the week, here is some additional interesting reading on argumentation: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

O’Keefe, D. (2012). Conviction, Persuasion, and Argumentation: Untangling the Ends and Means of Influence. Argumentation, 26(1), 19–32. 

Be sure to use an outside resource in your main post, and please post that before Wednesday. See our discussion rubric as a reference when you are writing your initial post. 

If you have any questions at all, email me or post to our class Q & A. 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

Title: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

Surrogate mothers 10 years on: a longitudinal study of psychological well-being and relationships with the parents and child. 

  • Claim: What was the article’s main point? What’s the thesis? 

The author claims that most surrogate mothers do not experience any psychological problems or depression and tend to have a positive relationship with the parents and child even after 10 yrs.  Thesis: Studies have shown that most Surrogate mothers continue to remain psychologically healthy. Even after a decade they continue to maintain a positive relationship with the child, parents and their spouse/partners. 

  • Grounds: What kinds of evidence did the author use to support his/her argument? Provide an example. 

The author has used a study conducted by V. Jadva, S. Imrie, and S. Golombok in 2003 where 34 surrogates were interviewed one year after the surrogate baby was born. The original 34 surrogates were again interviewed 10yrs after the surrogate baby was born. Based on this study, it was concluded that majority of surrogate mothers do not experience psychological problems in the decade following the birth of the surrogacy child and maintain a healthy relationship with the surrogate child, parents and their own family. 

  • Warrants: Did the author(s) successfully connect the evidence to the main point? How so? 

Yes, in my opinion the author has successfully connected the evidence to the main point. The evidence provided by the author is a detailed study conducted in 2003 of 34 surrogate mothers over a period of 10 yrs. The author has described how the study was conducted in great detail. 

  • Backing: How credible were the sources the author(s) applied? How does credulity affect your overall response? 

The author has given a list of credible references to support his claim. He has explained the surrogate study in great detail and how they were conducted and how the data was acquired, analyzed and concluded. Credulity did not affect my overall response. 

  • Qualifiers: Did you notice any absolutes (all, every, each) or limiters (some, several, many)? How did they add or subtract from the argument? 

Yes I did notice absolutes like all and each used a few times in the article. Limiter like some has been used few times whereas several and many has been used one time each in the article. Absolutes like all and each were used to make the argument sound more convincing and Limiters were used to let the audience know that it does not include everyone but a few. ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

  • Rebuttal: Did the author(s) present any points of opposition and counterarguments? How did it influence your reaction? 

The author’s point of opposition was about the small sample size of the surrogate study as well as the non-participation of some participants in the second phase of study. The author counter-argues by stating that the non-participation was because the research team was unable to contact them as they had changed residence in the 10 yrs. time. Another point of opposition is the low level of kappa value related to frequency of contact with father. The author counter-argues that this type of contact is difficult to classify and maybe sporadic. The author validates his argument by point to the high kappa value for contact between mother and child to prove that the scale was reliable. In my opinion the counter-arguments to the both the opposition points was very convincing and did not affect my perception of the article. 

  Reference 

(n.d.). Retrieved from https://academic-oup-Links to an external site.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/humrep/article/30/2/373/728908 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

Title: ENGL 147N Week 2 Discussion: Argumentative Strategies

I questioned the statement about “all” of the surrogates having positive outcomes.  I would have expected there to be maybe a small percentage who were regretful.  I suppose those who get into surrogacy go into it with the idea that this is not their baby, and when the time comes to have the child and give it to the parents, they have been preparing for it for some time. Still, I would think there would be some that unexpectedly felt sad about it.

I do think that the fact that there were only 20 surrogates in this study really makes it quite limited. It does state that the extent to which the findings can be generalized is not known. I think that is a small sample. I would want to see some diversity among surrogates (more info on their religions, races, socioeconomic status, etc) to see if there were differences in their feelings based on cultural differences.

At the same time, I do think that when someone goes into surrogacy, it’s a process, and they are likely prepared and do not ever see the child as their own. The surrogate, I’m assuming, is usually not a biological contributor. I do wonder, though, if it’s hard to feel the baby growing, kicking, etc and know they will not keep it. You would think that at least a few would feel sad after the event.