DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes?

DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes?

Sample Answer for DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes? Included After Question

DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes


One key issue related to poor adherence to prescribed treatment is patient lack of understanding. What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes?

Title: DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes?

2.1. Setting and sample

The Baylor University Institutional Review Board approved the survey and informed consent procedures used in this research study, which was nested within a larger study designed to assess self-reported health behaviors and the prevalence of perceived health symptoms. The target population were patients of the Family Health Center (FHC), a large federally qualified health center in central Texas. At the health center in 2016, 165,784 primary medical care encounters were provided to 49,581 patients by 68 physicians (21 family physicians, 38 resident/fellow family physicians, 2 pediatricians, 3 internists, 4 obstetrician/gynecologists), 14 nurse practitioners, and 5 physician assistants. Approximately 1 out of every 5 county residents is a health center patient, and over 90% of FHC patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty guidelines.[]

Between February 15 and June 15, 2016, patients were approached in FHC waiting rooms to determine eligibility. Eligible patients were English-speaking adult patients ≥40 years of age. Patients who met inclusion criteria and provided consent were administered orally a 10-minute survey by study staff. After the survey was complete, study staff accessed electronic medical records to obtain laboratory, medication, and healthcare utilization data. When the patient completed the survey, his/her name was included in a drawing for a 1 in 10 chance of winning a $20 gift card to a local grocery store.

2.2. Measures

Health literacy was assessed with 2 tools: the NVS and a single-item screening question. The NVS is a quick and valid functional health literacy assessment.[] Administration time ranges from 2 to 6 minutes and it has a high sensitivity to detect limited healthy literacy.[] Patients are given an ice cream nutrition label and asked subsequent 6 questions. Questions focus on caloric and nutritional intake (testing reading and numeracy) and ingredients (testing functional health literacy); responses are scored as correct or incorrect and correct responses are summed (see Appendix 1). According to previous work, patients who respond with 4 or more correct responses are likely to have adequate health literacy, patients who respond with 2 or 3 correct responses have a possibility of limited health literacy, and patients who respond with 0 or 1 correct responses have a high likelihood of limited health literacy. In addition to the NVS, a single-item screening question was also used to identify perceived difficulty with medical information. Patients were asked “How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?”[] Response choices included ExtremelyQuite a bitSomewhatA little bit, and Not at all. Patients completed this single question during a telephone call after they completed the oral survey to obtain all other data in 2016.

DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes
DNP 835 What tools are available to determine a level of health literacy and how can they be utilized to improve patient outcomes


Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 835 Topic 7 Discussion Question Two

Patients were also asked to provide self-rated health status, determined from the question “In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?”[] Demographic data were obtained from the electronic medical record and included age, sex, and race/ethnicity (categorized as Hispanic/Latino, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, or non-Hispanic other (which included Asian)). Health data from the electronic medical record included body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), diabetes status (yes/no), and number of current medications. Healthcare utilization in the previous 24 months included number of office visits and number of missed appointments, defined as the number of “no shows” plus the number of canceled appointments.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, including mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and percent for categorical variables, were calculated for all variables in the total study population. We also described the study population by NVS assessment results, using 4 categories: missing (i.e., patient declined NVS assessment), high likelihood of limited health literacy, possibility of limited health literacy, and adequate health literacy. We compared the 4 categories, which included the “missing” health literacy category, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. We generated odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression to determine the association between each predictor variable separately and the possibility or high likelihood of limited health literacy (NVS < 4). We also used multivariate logistic regression to simultaneously adjust for all other predictor variables. Data management, descriptive statistics, and logistic regression models were conducted using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed using MedCalc software (v17.7.2) to determine the perceived level of confidence completing medical forms that has the best balance of sensitivity and specificity in comparison to the NVS instrument used as the reference standard. The larger the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC)—that is, the closer the curve follows the left and top borders of the plot—the more accurate the test.[,] We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios as predictors of possibly or high likelihood of limited health literacy (NVS < 4). Statistical significance was defined a priori at the 2-sided α = 0.05 level.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.


Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource