DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points - Revision

DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to utilize the feedback you received on your DPI Project Milestone: Outline of 10 Strategic Points assignment you submitted in Topic 2. Ensure that you have incorporated all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor. Keep in mind your project will continue to evolve as you advance through the program. This is expected. It is essential that you continue to refine your 10 Strategic Points in subsequent courses.

General Requirements:

Access the DC Network and download “10 Strategic Points.”
Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Complete the “10 Strategic Points” document. Include all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor.

Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

Rubric Criteria

Total50 points

Criterion	1. Not present	2. Does not meet Expectations	3. Approaching Meeting Expectations	4. Meets Expectations
Clinical/PICOT Questions Provides clinical/PICOT questions to all of the collected data needed to address the problem statement.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Data Collection Describes primary instruments and sources of data to answer research questions. Reliability and validity of the instruments are addressed.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Topic Topic	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	0.37 points NA	0.44 points NA	0.5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.
Problem Statement Describes the problem to address through the project based on defined gaps or needs from the literature.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	1.85 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	2.18 points NA	2.5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Sample and Location Identifies sample, needed sample size, and location.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Paper Format Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.	0 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	1.85 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	2.18 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	2.5 points All format elements are correct.
Literature Review Lists primary points for four sections in the Literature Review: (a) Background of the problem/gap and the need for the project based on citations from the literature; (b) Theoretical foundations (models and theories to be foundation for study); (c) Review of literature topics with key concept for each one; (d) Summary.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	5.55 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	6.53 points NA	7.5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.
Variables Provides variables for each project PICOT question component.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	1.85 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	2.18 points NA	2.5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Documentation of Sources Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	0 points Sources are not documented.	1.85 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	2.18 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	2.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Purpose Statement Provides one-sentence statement of purpose including the problem statement, methodology, design, population sample, and location.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. The intervention is listed appropriately. There is a measurable patient outcome.
Research Minimum of one or two original research articles from United States within 5 years of graduate date.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	1.48 points Revision is attempted, but is is inaccurate or missing components.	1.74 points NA	2 points There are original research articles present to support the evidence-based intervention. The articles are from the United States and are within 5 years of graduation date.
Methodology and Design Describes the selected methodology and specific research design to address problem statement and clinical/PICOT questions.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
Data Analysis Describes the specific data analysis approaches to be used to address clinical/PICOT questions. The statistical test(s) that will be used must be identified and must be appropriate for the level of data and the clinical/PICOT question.	0 points Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.	3.7 points Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.	4.35 points NA	5 points Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Criterion

1. Not present

2. Does not meet Expectations

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4. Meets Expectations

Clinical/PICOT Questions

Provides clinical/PICOT questions to all of the collected data needed to address the problem statement.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Data Collection

Describes primary instruments and sources of data to answer research questions. Reliability and validity of the instruments are addressed.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Topic

Topic

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

0.37 points

0.44 points

0.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.

Problem Statement

Describes the problem to address through the project based on defined gaps or needs from the literature.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

1.85 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

2.18 points

2.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Sample and Location

Identifies sample, needed sample size, and location.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Paper Format

Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1.85 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

2.18 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2.5 points

All format elements are correct.

Literature Review

Lists primary points for four sections in the Literature Review: (a) Background of the problem/gap and the need for the project based on citations from the literature; (b) Theoretical foundations (models and theories to be foundation for study); (c) Review of literature topics with key concept for each one; (d) Summary.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

5.55 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

6.53 points

7.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.

Variables

Provides variables for each project PICOT question component.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

1.85 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

2.18 points

2.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Documentation of Sources

Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

1.85 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

2.18 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Purpose Statement

Provides one-sentence statement of purpose including the problem statement, methodology, design, population sample, and location.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. The intervention is listed appropriately. There is a measurable patient outcome.

Research

Minimum of one or two original research articles from United States within 5 years of graduate date.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

1.48 points

Revision is attempted, but is is inaccurate or missing components.

1.74 points

2 points

There are original research articles present to support the evidence-based intervention. The articles are from the United States and are within 5 years of graduation date.

Methodology and Design

Describes the selected methodology and specific research design to address problem statement and clinical/PICOT questions.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Data Analysis

Describes the specific data analysis approaches to be used to address clinical/PICOT questions. The statistical test(s) that will be used must be identified and must be appropriate for the level of data and the clinical/PICOT question.

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

4.35 points

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points - Revision — DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: DNP-815A DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points