DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Sample Answer for DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision Included After Question

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to utilize the feedback you received on your DPI Project Milestone: Outline of 10 Strategic Points assignment you submitted in Topic 2. Ensure that you have incorporated all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor. Keep in mind your project will continue to evolve as you advance through the program. This is expected. It is essential that you continue to refine your 10 Strategic Points in subsequent courses.

General Requirements:

• Access the DC Network and download “10 Strategic Points.” ( I WILL DOWNLOAD AND SEND THIS)
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Complete the “10 Strategic Points” document. Include all suggested changes and revisions from your instructor.

Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A

I, (Vera U), verify that I have completed and logged (5) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Rubric

 

DPI Project Milestone: Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision – Rubric

Criteria Description

Topic

4. Meets Expectations

0.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

0.44 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

0.37 points

NA

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Lists primary points for four sections in the Literature Review: (a) Background of the problem/gap and the need for the project based on citations from the literature; (b) Theoretical foundations (models and theories to be foundation for study); (c) Review of literature topics with key concept for each one; (d) Summary.

4. Meets Expectations

7.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. Revision is complete and accurate.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

6.53 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

5.55 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Minimum of one or two original research articles from United States within 5 years of graduate date.

4. Meets Expectations

2 points

There are original research articles present to support the evidence-based intervention. The articles are from the United States and are within 5 years of graduation date.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

1.74 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

1.48 points

Revision is attempted, but is is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Describes the problem to address through the project based on defined gaps or needs from the literature.

4. Meets Expectations

2.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

2.18 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

1.85 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Identifies sample, needed sample size, and location.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Provides clinical/PICOT questions to all of the collected data needed to address the problem statement.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Provides variables for each project PICOT question component.

4. Meets Expectations

2.5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

2.18 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

1.85 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Describes the selected methodology and specific research design to address problem statement and clinical/PICOT questions.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Provides one-sentence statement of purpose including the problem statement, methodology, design, population sample, and location.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions. The intervention is listed appropriately. There is a measurable patient outcome.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Describes primary instruments and sources of data to answer research questions. Reliability and validity of the instruments are addressed.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Describes the specific data analysis approaches to be used to address clinical/PICOT questions. The statistical test(s) that will be used must be identified and must be appropriate for the level of data and the clinical/PICOT question.

4. Meets Expectations

5 points

Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

4.35 points

NA

2. Does not meet Expectations

3.7 points

Revision is attempted, but it is inaccurate or missing components.

1. Not present

0 points

Item is not present, or the required revisions are not made.

Criteria Description

Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

4. Meets Expectations

2.5 points

All format elements are correct.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

2.18 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Does not meet Expectations

1.85 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Not present

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Criteria Description

Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

4. Meets Expectations

2.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

3. Approaching Meeting Expectations

2.18 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Does not meet Expectations

1.85 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Not present

0 points

Sources are not documented.

\

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Title: DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 815 DPI Project Milestone Outline of 10 Strategic Points – Revision

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: DNP 815 Connecting Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Models