DNP 815 Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
Sample Answer for DNP 815 Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview Included After Question
Assessment Description
For this assignment, learners explain how personal knowledge and skills gained in this course assist in solving their Direct Practice Improvement Project practice problem, and how the Christian worldview is supported within your project’s purpose and the project site’s organizational mission and vision.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, titled “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews.”
- This assignment requires that at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed, sources related to this topic with at least one in-text citation for each source.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Directions:
Construct a case report (2,000-2,250 words) using your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project’s purpose, problem, and clinical questions. Apply your chosen nursing theory and evidence-based change model from the Topic 3 assignment to support your DPI Project. Your case report must include the headings provided below. Refer to the “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews” template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, to complete your assignment. The specific criteria for this assignment are located on this template.
- Case Report Background
- Christian Worldviews
- Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model
- Pulling It Together
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (Vera U), verify that I have completed and logged (10 ) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 815 Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
Title: DNP 815 Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
The proposed project focuses on the reduction of patient falls, focusing specifically on post-operative patients in a post-operative rehabilitation center. Traditionally, health professionals rely solely on clinical fall prevention strategies; thinking of ways of optimizing patient outcomes in this respect, it has been determined that more than traditional strategies is needed. The intention is therefore to determine whether or not combining specific patient-centered interventions with clinical fall prevention strategies succeeds in achieving significant reductions in patient falls over a two-month period.
Purpose Of Project
The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental quality improvement (QI) project is to determine if the implementation of patient-centered fall interventions in rehabilitation centers for post-operative patients would impact the number of fall incidents among post-operative patients in Rehabilitation Centers in District of Columbia over four weeks.
Christian World View
Everyone has a worldview. Whether or not we realize it, we all have certain presuppositions and biases that affect the way we view all of life and reality. A worldview is like a set of lenses which taint our vision or alter the way we perceive the world around us. The Christian worldview on the other hand makes us believe that God exists (Heb. 11:6) and that He is the standard by which we measure everything else. A Christian worldview teaches us: God created everything that exists (Gen.1:1) and everything is held together by Him (Col. 1:17). (NKJV,2022)
GCU is a missional, Christ-centered university with an innovative and adaptive spirit that addresses the world’s deep needs by cultivating compassionate Christian community, empowering free and virtuous action, and serving others in ways that promote human flourishing. The doctrinal statement at GCU emphasizes on the nine believes that has been the purpose and mission value of the institution. These doctrinal statements believes the bible to be the only infallible, true and authoritative word of God. GCU expresses aspects of the Christian worldview, which affect human value and dignity, ethical decision-making, academic disciplines and vocation. “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5). And to crown it all it is GCU’s believe on the message of salvation as an “indictment against all forms of alienation oppression and discrimination, denouncing evil and injustice wherever it exists”
Hence for GCU, it is their mission that through academic excellence, the university equips students with knowledge of the Christian worldview, instilling a sense of purpose and vocational calling that enables students to be innovative thinkers, effective communicators, global contributors and transformative leaders who change their communities by placing the interests of others before their own.
Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model
Sibley hospital vision is to be a role model for innovation in healthcare and wellness for all. Mission is on delivering excellence and compassionate care, every person, every time. The mission of Sibley Memorial Hospital is to provide quality health services and facilities for the community, to promote wellness, to relieve suffering, and to restore health as swiftly, safely, and humanely as it can be done, consistent with the best service we can give at the highest value for all concerned (Sibley ,2021). The proposed theory is the patient centered theory and the proposed model is Lewin’s change model. Lewin’s change model supposes a change of the fall prevention paradigm. Through this change model, the idea is to move away from solely implementing fall prevention strategies, and moving towards the combination of said strategies with patient-centered interventions.
Connection Of Mission and Vision to Nursing Theory.
Patient-centered nursing theory proposes moving away from the actual disease or condition, and instead moving towards the patient as an individual or human being. This is valuable to the extent that it leads health professionals towards seeing patients, not as statistics or cases to be solved, but rather as human beings in need of comprehensive, personalized care. This humanizes the profession of nursing, and it also facilitates the establishment of rapport, trust and collaboration between nurses and patients. The mission and vision of my proposed site is aligned with the nursing theory chosen, this site relies and practices on delivering a compassionate , excellence patient centered care to each individual that walks through their door “ every patient ,every time(Sibley ,2021).
Connection Of Vision and Mission to Evidence-Based Change Model
The proposed change model is Lewin’s change model, which offers a simplified approach to change implementation. This model proposes three fundamental strategies, i.e. unfreezing, movement and refreezing. This is considered valuable for successful implementation This model, as previously mentioned, contemplates three distinct stages. The first is refreezing, which supposes disruption. It supposes creating awareness about the need for change, thereby promoting support for said change. The second stage is movement, which means deciding on how to proceed with actual implementation of the change intervention. The third and final stage, i.e. refreezing, implies assimilating and normalizing the change intervention as standard practice (Teguh et al., 2019).
The vision and mission of my DPI proposed site can be intertwined by their proposals that centers on change in an individual. They create a support and promote support through implementation of proposed change that is innovative, individualized and patientive centered.
Pulling It Together
The patient-centered nursing theory is based on human needs theory; it hinges on the nursing professional’s ability to identify the patient’s problem(s) and subsequently develop a specific typology of treatment for that patient. The process to be followed in the application of this nursing theory integrates a sequence of steps. It all starts with the nurse knowing the patient, and then sorting out the relevant, significant information (Ortiz, 2018). The process also calls for the patient and their family need to be included in treatment and the nurse needs to engage in introspection to determine their own feelings relative to the patient prior to discussing a comprehensive care plan (Eklund et al., 2019). Therefore, applying the Christian world view to this model is going to be successful as both emphasis on the human or individual been at the forefront of care. a patient centered care entails putting a patient above self, compassion care every person every time. Therefore, the proposed change model fits in with the proposed clinical question, the mission and vision of the proposed site, GCU mission and the Christian world view. The combination of these theories and views and mission statements will indeed change the direction of patient care and promote improved positive patient outcomes.
References
Eklund, J. H., Holmström, I. K., Kumlin, T., Kaminsky, E., Skoglund, K., Höglander, J., … & Meranius, M. S. (2019). “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(1), 3-11.
Grand Canyon University (2020) Christian identity and mission: Doctrinal statement https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission#:~:text=GCU%E2%80%99s%20Doctrinal%20Statement%20affirms%20our%20faith%20and%20beliefs,and%20identity%20into%20clear%20focus.%20Ethical%2
New King James Version Bible .Retrieved august 24th 2022 https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-King-James-Version-NKJV-Bible/
Ortiz, M. R. (2018). Patient-centered care: Nursing knowledge and policy. Nursing Science Quarterly, 31(3), 291-295.
Sibley Memorial Hospital (2021) Our Mission, vision and values. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/sibley-memorial-hospital/about/index.html
Teguh, A., Hariyati, R. T. S., & Muhaeriwati, T. (2019). Applicability of Lewin’s change management model for optimization management function in nursing delegation between head nurse and team leader: A mini project in Jakarta military hospital. International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS), 2(2), 66-74.
Rubric
Case Report: Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview – Rubric
Criteria Description
Case Report Background Problem, Population
- Excellent
13.5 points
The criteria for the case report are thoroughly and accurately presented. The narrative is well-supported.
- Good
12.42 points
The criteria for the case report are adequately presented. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
- Satisfactory
11.88 points
The criteria for the case report are generally presented. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.
- Less Than Satisfactory
10.8 points
The case report is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The case report is omitted.
Criteria Description
Christian Worldviews Doctrinal statements (9), Synthesis, and Application
- Excellent
20.25 points
The doctrinal statements are clearly presented, synthesized, and applied. The narrative is insightful and well written.
- Good
18.63 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and adequately applied and synthesized.
- Satisfactory
17.82 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and generally applied and synthesized. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.
- Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
One doctrinal statement is missing; or, the doctrinal statements are incomplete overall.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The doctrinal statements are omitted.
Criteria Description
Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Cite Mission and Vision, Connection to Nursing Theory, Connection to Change Model
- Excellent
20.25 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is thoroughly described. A clear and well-supported connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
- Good
18.63 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. An adequate connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
- Satisfactory
17.82 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is outlined. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. A general connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
- Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is omitted.
Criteria Description
Pulling It Together Connect and align purpose to Christian worldview, the mission and vision, and nursing theory and change model; provide examples; incorporate and align with DPI Project.
- Excellent
20.25 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are thoroughly established. Clear examples are provided. The purpose incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
- Good
18.63 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are established. Examples are provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. The purpose adequately incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
- Satisfactory
17.82 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
- Less Than Satisfactory
16.2 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are omitted.
Criteria Description
Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model
- Excellent
13.5 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied throughout and provide clear and strong support for the DPI Project.
- Good
12.42 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are adequately applied. These provide support for the overall project. Some minor aspects of the project would benefit with further application of the selected theory or model.
- Satisfactory
11.88 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are generally applied. Some parts of the project are unsupported.
- Less Than Satisfactory
10.8 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied intermittently or incorrectly. These fail to provide support for the DPI Project.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are not applied.
Criteria Description
Research
- Excellent
6.75 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
- Good
6.21 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
- Satisfactory
5.94 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- Excellent
6.75 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- Good
6.21 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- Satisfactory
5.94 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- Excellent
6.75 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- Good
6.21 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- Satisfactory
5.94 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
- Excellent
6.75 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- Good
6.21 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- Satisfactory
5.94 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Criteria Description
Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
- Excellent
10.8 points
All format elements are correct.
- Good
9.94 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- Satisfactory
9.5 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8.64 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Criteria Description
Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
- Excellent
9.45 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- Good
8.69 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- Satisfactory
DNP 815 Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
8.32 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
7.56 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Check Out: NRS 430 Topic 5 DQ 2 Discuss the importance of advocacy as it pertains to patient care