DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Sample Answer for DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation Included After Question

DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Assignment: Becoming Familiar with the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation 

The successful completion of the DNP project or dissertation will entail the consideration of a number of steps as well as outline. One of the steps is brainstorming researchable ideas. Brainstorming enables the identification of critical issues in nursing practice that can be addressed through DNP project or dissertation. The second step is performing literature review where one critiques the existing evidence to identify gaps that the DNP project should address. The third step entails the presentation of the proposal to the faculty team (Roush, 2019). The project or dissertation development follows once the proposal is approved. The step that follows is the submission of the project for institutional review board approval. The approval leads to data collection from the participants or subjects in a project or dissertation. Data analysis is the next step to determine the impact of the project. The DNP nurse presents data and its implications to the institutional committee for approval. One then graduates after completing the above processes (Moran et al., 2019). The area of interest for DNP scholarly project is reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections among hospitalized patients. The expected timeline for completing the project is six months.  

I will use scholarly sources of evidence to complete the DNP project or dissertation. The scholarly sources will include journals, books, government websites and websites of authoritative organizations such as the World Health Organization. The documents will provide evidence-based information that relate to the focus of the project or dissertation (Bradshaw & Vitale, 2020). The guide document by Walden University will be used in undertaking the project or dissertation activities. The document provides guidelines on the expected deliverables that the students must achieve in the project.  

 

References 

Bradshaw, M., & Vitale, T. (2020). The Dnp Project Workbook: A Step-By-Step Process for Success. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. 

Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2019). The Doctor of Nursing Practice Project. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

Roush, K. (2019). A Nurse’s Step-By-Step Guide to Publishing a Dissertation or DNP Project. Sigma. 

 

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Title: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

Becoming Familiar with the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation 

The purpose of a DNP scholarly project is to translate evidence-based research into nursing practice. DNP students can use the scholarly project to prove their ability to lead and practice at the highest level of clinical nursing practice (Hande & Phillippi, 2018). My DNP project will focus on geriatrics. I would be interested in a project on a nurse-led Dementia prevention program for community-dwelling older adults.     

The first step in the DNP project will be to identify a practice problem and a practice gap, identify a chair, and select the approach and DNP practicum manual type. The second step will be to develop a prospectus and upload it for review by the committee and approval by the program’s director (Walden University, 2018).  After approval, I will work on the proposal’s sections 1-3 and regularly submit it to the faculty for feedback. After that, I will present the proposal to my chair for approval and upload the proposal to the Preliminary committee for Rubric Analysis and the committee Rubric analysis for a formal review.   

IRB application for form A will begin after committee approval and submission of the proposal to URR. The next step will be an oral presentation, which I will conduct using a PowerPoint presentation (Walden University, 2018). Afterward, I will complete the subsequent steps in line with my proposal and the approved IRB, including data collection as per the project. Upon completing the DNP project, I will upload it to the preliminary section in MYDR chair and then to the committee on Rubric Analysis.  

In year one of the DNP program, I will develop the prospectus and complete sections 1 and 2 of the proposal. In year two, I will complete section 3, meet with the committee, complete IRB approval, and defend the project proposal. In the final year, I will collect data and complete the final project scholarly manuscript. I will also defend the final project, work on revisions on the final manuscript, and submit the final project’s document to the Knowledge Bank with permission from the chair.   

The documents that I will use for the DNP scholarly project include the DNP Project Process Guide, DNP practicum manual, DNP Prospectus guide and rubric, DNP Minimum Standards Rubric, and DNP Final Quality Rubric. For oral presentations, I will use the DNP Proposal Defense PowerPoint Template and Final Defense PowerPoint Template. 

 

 

References 

Hande, K., & Phillippi, J. C. (2018). DNP Project Timeline Template: A Guide for Successful Completion. Nurse educator, 43(3), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000472 

Walden University. (2018, May). Academic guides: Capstone documents: DNP doctoral project. Welcome – Walden University Departments & Centers – Academic Guides at Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/dnp 

 

 

 

Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

As a doctoral candidate, you will complete either a DNP Scholarly Project or a PhD Dissertation. Are you curious about what will be required of you? For this Assignment, you locate and read materials that pertain to your doctoral program at Walden University, and begin thinking about your DNP Scholarly Project or PhD Dissertation.

To prepare:

DNP students:

• Review the DNP section of the Walden University website (http://researchcenter.waldenu.edu/DNP-Doctoral-Study-Program.htm.
• Carefully review the requirements for the DNP Scholarly Project process.
• Consider the steps and timeline you will work through to complete the DNP Scholarly project.

PhD students:

• Review the information presented at the Walden University Writing Center PhD Dissertation website (http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/549.htm).
• Carefully review the requirements for the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process.
• Consider the steps you will work through to complete the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process and the timeline for completing each step.

To complete:

Write a 1-page paper outlining the steps, timeline for completing the project / dissertation, and the documents you will use for either the DNP Scholarly Project or the PhD Dissertation. Include the main guide document that identifies the processes and procedures for the appropriate doctoral project.

DNP students:

• Summarize the purpose of the DNP Scholarly Project.
• Briefly describe a project that would be of interest to you and how you might go about completing that project.

Due by Day 7 of Week 5.

Week in Review

This week, you evaluated professional opportunities for intra- and interdisciplinary collaborative practice available to nurses with a doctoral degree.

Next week, you will explore the various resources provided by Walden University to assist you in becoming a critical and scholarly reader, thinker, and writer.

To go to the next week:

Week 4

 

The Assignment that you began working on in Week 3 is due by Day 7 of this week.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Assignment Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5

To submit your Assignment:

Week 5 Assignment

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation

DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also:  NURS 8302 WEEK 11 Discussion Evaluating and Sustaining Change INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC