COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography

COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography

Sample Answer for COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography Included After Question

Description

Topic is Major safety and health issues in the workplace.
Instructions:  Using the information from this week’s reading material, submit an Annotated Bibliography of 5 sources from your working bibliography. First, put the source in the correct citation format for your particular curricular division, and then write a brief annotation of that source.  APA  is the format. The annotation should describe the main ideas covered in the source as well as an evaluation by you for the source’s usefulness for your project.

COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography
COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:COLL 300 APU Major Safety and Health Issues Annotated Bibliography

Safety and Health Issues Thesis statement Safety and health issues being the key issues in the workplace, the organization should maintain procedures that promote safety and health aspects for its contractors. The research question that led me to this thesis statement The research questions that led to this thesis statement are; what are the top safety issues in an organization? What are the duties of management concerning safety and health at the workplace? In what ways does the management train the employers to make sure that they have adequate knowledge and skills that make them be excellent in safety and health issues at work? What questions should an employer ask himself in measuring stability of safety in the organization? My purpose in writing this paper The objective of this paper is to point out the three major safety and health issues in the workplace. It will outline the communicable diseases, workplace violence, and electric dangers as the selected safety issues (Burke, Clarke and Cooper, 2011). The paper will also give an explanation as to why employers should play a role in ensuring safety in the organization. What I already know and my feelings towards the topic Safety in the workplace is a very important issue. Safety issues, for example, accidents can be prevented if the employees are well prepared and ready to work together. A hazard like a contagious disease is also preventable if the safety measures are well incorporated. I have a feeling that the employers have a lot to do in ensuring SAFETY AND HEALTH ISSUES 2 that the employees work in a protected environment. What my readers already know and their feelings towards the topic My readers already know the safety challenges in an organization. My audience needs to understand that this research paper will be vital for them since, as they begin to work, they will have an idea about safety measures. Most people feel that safety is a government issue that should be addressed by state laws. What my readers need to know to understand my point In my explanation, I believe that organization management is fully responsible for safety measures (Jain, Leka and Zwetsloot, 2018). The government doesn’t play a role here because it doesn’t monitor all the practices in an organization. The management should train the employees on safety and health issues and how to prevent calamities. What information I need to research and add to my paper I need to work on a few details to add to this paper. In this case, I will have to work on policies that need to be included in health management that ensure safety in an organization. I will also include the disaster management plan by drawing graphs on what the organization should be prepared for. Lastly, i will conduct research on what should be contained in the system audit protocols to ensure top safety in an organization. SAFETY AND HEALTH ISSUES 3 References Burke, R. J., Clarke, S., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). Occupational Health and Safety. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing. Jain, A., Leka, S., & Zwetsloot, G. I. (2018). Managing Health, Safety and WellBeing: Ethics, Responsibility and Sustainability. Springer. Source Evaluation: Major safety and health Issues in the workplace Cooklin, A., Joss, N., Husser, E., & Oldenburg, B. (2016). Integrated Approaches to Occupational Health and Safety: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 31(5), 401-412. doi:10.4278/ajhp.141027-lit-542 URL Link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.4278/ajhp.141027-LIT-542 Cooklin, Joss, and Husser are research experts at Monash University in the school of Public health and preventive medicine with numerous publications in that field. The researchers have vast experience in matters of occupational health and safety. Oldenburg, on the other hand, is also a Ph.D. holder and also a researcher at the Melbourne school of population and global health. The authors are autonomously well versed in the topic to provide credible information. The publisher of this article is the American journal of health promotion. This publisher is known for quality peer-reviewed journals in diverse disciplines such as health promotion while delivering the most current and relevant research information. The information is available in the SAGE publication pages depicting that the information is from a stable and reliable site. The information is accurate because it has integrated research methods to develop viable conclusions after reviewing credible resources such as electronic databases, Psych Info, and MEDLINE in matters of occupational health and safety (Harzing, 2010). The information in this article has been peer-reviewed because it has already been published under the American Journal of Health Promotion, which is known for publishing peerreviewed articles. The information was published in 2016, meaning that the information is current and up to date. The information is from the American Journal of Health promotion website, which was last updated this year. This research wants to identify the SOURCE EVALUATION 2 viability of integrated approaches in addressing health and safety issues in the organization in the modern workplace. The study is objective since it relies on data from workplace intervention targets to collect assessed by the American college of occupational and environmental medicine guidelines. I feel that the objective sample size enables the research to eliminate any bias that the authors may have. Smidt, B., & Dinenberg, R. (2014, July 1). Total Worker Health Approach Helps Organizations and Employees Thrive — Occupational Health & Safety. Retrieved from https://ohsonline.com/Articles/2014/07/01/Total-Worker-Health-ApproachHelps-Organizations-and-Employees-Thrive.aspx?Page=1 Brenda, MBA, is the President and CEO of Viridian Health Management. She is known for designing health programs for organizations. The author has over 15 years’ experience working with various organizations and understands issues of healthcare and safety in organizations settings. Robert is the chief medical officer at the Viridian health management dedicated to promoting preventive health and safety for employees. The author is well versed in issues of health and safety within organizations. This information was posted in the Occupational health and safety magazine issue of 2014. This is a reliable digital and print magazine that seeks to deliver reliable information in the field of health and safety promotion at the workplace. This information was published in a digital edition of a trade/professional website to provide valuable information to organizations and employees about workplace health and safety issues. The information is available on the OHS website that was updated as recently as 2019. The information seems to be accurate because the magazine is designed to address issues of worker health and safety in the workplace. The article is comprehensive, with at least six pages of SOURCE EVALUATION 3 reliable content that provides an objective perspective from professionals in the field. The article contains at least six references at the end that the authors retrieved information from. The material is up to date as the article was published in 2014 while the website was last updated in 2019. The authors have covered the issue from a professional perspective without any bias. The authors have also quoted various authors and researchers from autonomous bodies and government agencies that provide reliable information on issues in this field, such as the national institute of occupational safety and health (Folk, 2012). The authors encourage the use of synergy to promote and ensure a safer working environment for employees, and hence, I do not detect any bias. SOURCE EVALUATION 4 References Folk, M. (2012). Online Credibility and Digital Ethos: Evaluating Computer-Mediated Communication: Evaluating Computer-Mediated Communication. IGI Global. Harzing, A. (2010). The Publish Or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis. CreateSpace.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100