ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

Sample Answer for ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003 Included After Question

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 2: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics

Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to erode quickly or worse.

Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignment asks you to consider these tools and how you might apply them to your own work.

In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous assignment.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this Module in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.
  • Reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity.

The Assignment:

Part 2, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

  • Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing
  • Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics
  • Cite at least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
  • Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.
  • Explain how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.

Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your:

  1. academic work as a student of the MSN program and
  2. professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

By Day 7 of Week 3

ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003
ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

Submit both Section 1 and Section 2 of Part 2.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

Title: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

As a student pursuing an MSN degree, upholding academic integrity and ethical practices is paramount. To avoid plagiarism, I will ensure to cite sources accurately and use paraphrasing when necessary. Tools such as Turnitin and Grammarly will aid in proofreading and eliminating plagiarism in my work. Additionally, seeking feedback and guidance from professors and peers will enable me to produce high-quality work while staying true to academic integrity.

As a nurse, I will uphold the highest ethical standards and adhere to the ANA Code of Ethics and principles of nursing practice. Seeking feedback and guidance from colleagues and mentors will help me improve my performance while advocating for the rights and well-being of patients and their families. Any unethical or unsafe practices will be reported promptly, ensuring that the trust and respect of my patients, colleagues, and the nursing profession are maintained. By prioritizing ethical practices in both academic and professional settings, I will uphold the integrity of the nursing profession and improve the quality of patient care.

Adhering to ethical practices and maintaining integrity is essential for both nursing students and professionals (Timmins, 2020). As a student in the MSN program, I will refer to the ANA Code of Ethics as a guideline to navigate the complexities of nursing practice and research. I will also utilize the resources available to me, such as the writing center, peer reviews, and faculty feedback, to improve my writing and research skills while staying true to the academic integrity policy of the university (Abbott et al., 2021). As a future professional advanced nurse, I will join professional organizations, such as the American Nurses Association, to stay informed of the latest evidence-based practices and advancements in the field. I will also prioritize advocating for the well-being and rights of my patients and reporting any unethical or unsafe practices. By maintaining these ethical standards, I aim to improve the quality of care provided to patients and promote the nursing profession’s integrity.

References:

Timmins, F. (2020). Writing for publication—Implications of text recycling and cut and paste writing. Journal of Nursing Management (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 28(5), 999–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12868

Abbott, M. R. B., & Nininger, J. (2021). Academic integrity in nursing education: Policy Review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2), 268–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.12.006

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

Title: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

The Connection between Academic and Professional Integrity

Academic integrity guarantees the academic reputation of an institution of higher learning and the standards of its awards. It makes sure that students get full credit for the work they present for assessment. This assignment seeks to examine the relationship between academic integrity and writing and between professional practices and scholarly ethics and explore how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing foster academic integrity.

Relationship between Academic Integrity and Writing

Academic integrity entails being honest, committed to, and exhibiting moral practices regarding academic work. It involves a scholar giving credit to other peoples’ work when they use their ideas or research content in writing essays or research papers (Guerrero-Dib et al., 2020). Students are obliged to acknowledge others’ contributions when writing by citing all the sources used. In writing, academic integrity is upheld by the scholar rephrasing the original text using their own words and still acknowledging the author’s ideas.

Relationship between Professional Practices and Scholarly Ethics

Professional practice is the conduct that is regarded as appropriate for a certain profession. The conduct primarily entails mentoring novice professionals, treating colleagues with respect and modesty regardless of personal and professional differences, and humbly serving others (Schmidt & McArthur, 2018). Scholarly ethics include various implicit and explicit professional standards and characteristics that describe an ethical, honest intellectual (Guerrero-Dib et al., 2020). A scholar demonstrates scholarly ethics by upholding the professional standards and working as per the professional practices developed in their profession.

Grammarly, Safe Assign, and Paraphrasing Contribute To Academic Integrity

Grammarly contributes to academic integrity through its plagiarism checker, which checks essays and research papers for plagiarized texts. It checks plagiarism by highlighting plagiarized texts and the source (Dong & Shi, 2021). SafeAssign allows one to put correct sources rather than just paraphrasing. It also checks texts for plagiarism by comparing an essay against databases to identify similarities in the essay and existing scholarly works (Soni, 2018). Paraphrasing fosters academic integrity by the scholar interpreting others’ ideas and research work using own words (Soni, 2018). It entails restating, compressing, and explaining another author’s ideas while promoting the credibility of the argument and analysis.

Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Academic integrity is a core value and will be vital to my success as an MSN student. I will maintain the integrity and ethics of my academic work by avoiding plagiarism, cheating, violating copyright, and giving false information or credentials (Soni, 2018). For instance, I will use plagiarism detector tools such as SafeAssign and Grammarly to avoid plagiarism. Besides, I will paraphrase others’ work and ideas using my own words to reduce similarity issues. However, I will acknowledge the authors’ contribution by citing the sources and indicating the author’s name, publication date, and page number.

Integrity and ethics are vital for nurses and are emphasized in the nurses’ code of conduct. I will maintain integrity and ethics in my nursing practice by treating my colleagues with respect and decorum despite their academic qualifications, experience, or personal factors (Schmidt & McArthur, 2018). Besides, I will uphold the professional standards and practices outlined in the nurses’ code of conduct. I will also practice and make decisions guided by the medical ethics of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Conclusion

Academic integrity entails avoiding dishonest practices, including plagiarizing and cheating but instead demonstrating moral behavior by acknowledging others’ ideas and work when writing. Professional practices refer to the conduct considered appropriate for members of a specific profession. Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing foster academic integrity by detecting and preventing plagiarism in writing texts.

References

Dong, Y., & Shi, L. (2021). Using Grammarly to support students’ source-based writing practices. Assessing Writing, 50, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100564

Guerrero-Dib, J. G., Portales, L., & Heredia-Escorza, Y. (2020). Impact of academic integrity on workplace ethical behaviour. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-0051-3

Schmidt, B. J., & McArthur, E. C. (2018, January). Professional nursing values: A concept analysis. In Nursing forum (Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 69-75). https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12211

Soni, G. K. (2018). Plagiarism Detection and Prevention: A Study. International Journal of Library & Information Science (IJLIS), 7(1). http://www.iaeme.com/IJLIS/index.asp

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

Name: NURS_6003_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 2, Section 1: Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes the following:

· Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
· Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
– Cite at least 2 resources that support your argument.
· Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product. Include sufficient evidence that these tools were utilized in explanation on how these tools contribute to academic integrity.

 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.

The response clearly and accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.

The response clearly and accurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.

The response accurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.

The response accurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response vaguely explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.

The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.

The response vaguely describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing or is missing. The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. The response includes insufficient or no evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided or the response is missing.
Part 2, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Identify and describe strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career.

Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

 50 (50%) – 55 (55%)

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.

The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

 44 (44%) – 49 (49%)

The response identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.

The response reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

 39 (39%) – 43 (43%)

The response vaguely identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work as a nurse.

The response inaccurately reviews and/or vaguely proposes resources and approaches to use as a student and professional.

 0 (0%) – 38 (38%)

The response about integrity and ethics strategies is vague and inaccurate or is missing.

The response about resources and approaches is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.		 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6003_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003

ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART 2 STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE ACADEMIC INTEGRITY AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS NURS 6003 Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

 Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

 The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
 The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
 The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
 The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
 Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also:  NURS-6002 Discussion Strategies for Academic Portfolios PEER POSTS 1