NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

Sample Answer for NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination Included After Question

NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination 

Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination. What were some of the priorities when meaningful use was developed?

Posted Date

Jan 12, 2022, 7:33 PM

Unread

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

Title: NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

Meaningful use has improved care coordination by creating an electronic version of sharing medical records amongst involved providers in a multitude of healthcare systems. According to Joneidy & Burke, meaningful use is the use of digital medical and health records that are used to improve quality, safety and efficiency of patient health information and a continuum for delivery of care. (2018). Electronic Health Records (EHRs) provide real time, current information that is quick to retrieve and available to all interdisciplinary teams in the healthcare delivery for the patient. Meaningful use was initially instituted to work with EHRs as an incentive-based program through Medicare. (Health IT, 2021). Hospitals have to demonstrate meaningful use each year in order to prevent Medicare payment adjustments and thereby loss of revenue for the hospital.

Meaningful use has improved care coordination between healthcare settings and can have a profound impact on patient care and the delivery of efficient high-quality care. There were five objectives according to Health IT, these being improving quality, safety efficiency and reduce health disparities (2021). The other priorities were to increase patient engagement, improve care coordination, expand population/public health and provide privacy and protection of personal health information. EHR and meaningful use has also realigned work flow, made charting concise and simplified as it is under one system for all providers to work through (CMS, 2021). This is especially important for those that are in a variety of health care clinics and interdisciplinary services. The patients EHR provides information that can potentially reduce medication errors, duplication of tests and procedures while providing patient safety in a high-quality healthcare delivery system (Penner, 2017).

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2021). Electronic health records. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/E-Health/EHealthRecords

Health IT. (2021). What is meaningful use. HealthIT.gov. https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-meaningful-use

Joneidy, S, Burke, M. (2018). Towards a Deeper Understanding of Meaningful Use in Electronic Health Records. Health Records. Health Info Library. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12233

Penner, S. J. (2017). Economics and financial management for nurses and nurse leaders (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing. ISBN-13: 9780826160010

 

 

REPLY

BH

Jan 12, 2022, 5:07 AM

Unread

Replies to Heidi Kivel

KNOWLEDGE CHECK

Discuss why care coordination is critical in today’s world. What are impacts of lack of care coordination?

REPLY

  • LH

 

Jan 12, 2022, 12:00 PM

Unread

Hello professor and class,

Care coordination is critical in today’s world because it improves health outcomes. Connecting patients to the health service that they need is key in delivery of care and treatment. Providing patients with the proper care can prevent further injury or exacerbation of current medical condition. “Care coordination involves deliberately organizing patient care activities and sharing information among all of the participants concerned with a patients care to achieve safer and more effective care.” (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2022) The main goal of care coordination is to meet patient’s needs and preferences in the delivery of high-quality, high-value health care.

Care Coordination. (2022). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://ahrq.gov

 

REPLY

TF

Jan 11, 2022, 2:34 PM

Unread

Replies to Heidi Kivel

Meaningful use is the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) incentive program. Three primary goals of the meaningful use program are standardizing the electronic capture of information, improving quality at the point of care, and using clinical decision support and patient self-management tools to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of treatments (American Hospital Association, 2022). According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2010), meaningful use is using certified EHR technology to improve the following:

  1. Quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities.
  2. Engage patients and families in their health care.
  3. Care coordination.
  4. Population and public health.
  5. Maintaining privacy and security.

 

The meaningful use is one of several programs that offer incentives to healthcare providers and organizations that engage in activities to improve patient care coordination (Adler-Milstein & Cohen, 2016). EHR has replaced paper paper-based health records, and more and more providers have adopted the use of the same (Penner, 2017). Besides streamlining a clinician’s workflow, EHR can support care-related activities including evidence-based decision support, quality management, and outcomes reporting (CMS, 2021). The sharing and exchange of data electronically help to facilitate care coordination. Patients sometimes move through different care delivery systems, and care coordination is critical to allow for timely, efficient, and safe care. Benefits of care coordination include safety regarding less medical errors; efficiency and time saving regarding accessing patient data between providers, different healthcare members, and organizations; and more effective means of communication between patients and providers.

NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination
NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

 

References NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination

 

Adler-Milstein, J. & Cohen, G. R. (2016). Meaningful use care coordination criteria: Perceived barriers and benefits among primary care providers. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954634

 

American Hospital Association. (2022). Goals of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records Programs. https://www.aha.org/websites/2009-12-11-goals-medicare-and-medicaid-electronic-health-records-programs

 

 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2021). Electronic health records. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/E-Health/EHealthRecords

 

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2010). What is meaningful use? https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/mu_stage1_reqoverview.pdf

Penner, S. J. (2017). Economics and Financial Management for Nurses and Nurse Leaders (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company. ISBN: 978-0-8261-6001-0

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination 

NUR 621 Identify two to three indications that meaningful use has improved care coordination Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NUR 621 Identify two quality metrics used in your clinical workplace