The value of interdisciplinary learning is the beauty of drawing on knowledge and strategies from multiple fields. Imagine how ill prepared a nurse would be who only studied human systems. Patients are naturally more than a collection of systems. They have personalities and perspectives that are shaped by experiences, culture, and other factors that impact health and wellness. To know how to help the patient, understanding of these other factors, such as how cultural norms may influence disease prevention or the success of a treatment regimen, is crucial.<\/p>\n
In the same way, the nursing middle range theories you examined in Week 2 are not the only theories that apply to and can guide nursing practice. Theories from other sciences, such as psychology and sociology, as well as from other fields, such as business, also have potential to support nursing practice<\/a>.<\/p>\n This week you will explore a range of interdisciplinary theories through your Discussion with colleagues. You will also complete your module Assignment by considering how interdisciplinary theories may contribute to creating a philosophy of nursing practice that can be a beacon on your DNP journey.<\/p>\n Required Readings\u00a0(click to expand\/reduce)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing<\/em> (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.<\/a><\/p>\n National League for Nursing (NLN). (n.d.). Simulation.<\/em> http:\/\/www.nln.org\/professional-development-programs\/simulation<\/a><\/p>\n Document:\u00a0Handout: Writing a Philosophy of Nursing Practice (Word document<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n (Review from Weeks 1 and 2)<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Required Media\u00a0(click to expand\/reduce)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Walden University. (2021).\u00a0DNP glossary<\/em>\u00a0[Interactive media]. Walden University Blackboard.\u00a0https:\/\/class.waldenu.edu<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Optional Resources\u00a0(click to expand\/reduce)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Transformational leadership plays a crucial role in altering the direction of a healthcare organization strategically. The identification of an issue and application of the desired change form the best attributes of a transformational leader. The transformational leadership theory achieves the above through visioning a desired change, examining the prevailing reality and identifying the existing chances for enhanced delivery of care through cultural change in a healthcare organization (Jambawo, 2018). Indeed, the import of the strategic vision in transformational leadership is its ability to drive the change process via facilitating personnel bonding and motivation towards the realization of the desired change based on organizational mission as well as vision.<\/p>\n Nursing shortage plays an integral role in determining the quality of services delivered by a healthcare organization. The issue leads to increased patient-to-nurse ratio due to short-staffing of a unit (Wu et al., 2020). Consequently, the quality of a nurse\u2019s professional life is affected, which may result in burnouts. Further, nursing shortage leads to stress and professional dissatisfaction, which cause nurses to leave the profession, further exacerbating the issue.<\/p>\n The application of the transformational leadership theory to nursing shortage could produce the desired results and help stem the exit of nurses. The transformational leadership theory could facilitate the desired change through the recognition of the need to improve the mental health environment of the nurses as well as their colleagues (Wu et al., 2020). Using the theory, a healthcare facility should execute program as well as policies that are intended to cushion the mental health of the personnel. Specifically, a transformational leader should create an open environment that fosters dialogue between and among the nursing colleagues (Boamah et al., 2018). Further, the implementation of a Code Lavender protocol that permits the removal of a needy nurse by their team members after the recognition of an overwhelming situation will also align with the above objective. Pertinently, the transformational leadership theory can also facilitate the presence of additional training to aid nurses deal with stressful situations that are prevalent in nursing facilities. Therefore, transformational leadership can play an integral role in ensuring that nurses are prevented from mental health issues, which will significantly reduce nursing shortage.<\/p>\n Boamah, S. A., Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C., & Clarke, S. (2018). Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nursing outlook<\/em>, 66<\/em>(2), 180-189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.outlook.2017.10.004<\/a><\/p>\n Jambawo, S. (2018). Transformational leadership and ethical leadership: their significance in the mental healthcare system. British Journal of Nursing<\/em>, 27<\/em>(17), 998-1001. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12968\/bjon.2018.27.17.998<\/a><\/p>\n Wu, X., Hayter, M., Lee, A. J., Yuan, Y., Li, S., Bi, Y., … & Zhang, Y. (2020). Positive spiritual climate supports transformational leadership as means to reduce nursing burnout and intent to leave. Journal of nursing management<\/em>, 28<\/em>(4), 804-813. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jonm.12994<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Select\u00a0Grid View\u00a0or\u00a0List View\u00a0to change the rubric’s layout.<\/em><\/p>\n Name:\u00a0NURS_8114_Week3_Discussion_Rubric<\/strong><\/p>\n 90%\u2013100%<\/td>\n 80%\u201389%<\/td>\n 70%\u201379%<\/td>\n 0%\u201369%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/td>\n Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three current credible sources.<\/td>\n Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible references.<\/td>\n Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Cited with fewer than two credible references.<\/td>\n Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible references.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Writing<\/td>\n Written clearly and concisely.<\/p>\n Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Written concisely.<\/p>\n May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Written somewhat concisely.<\/p>\n May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Timely and full participation<\/td>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.<\/td>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sample Answer for NURS 8114 Other Theories That Support Nursing Practice Essay Included After Question The value of interdisciplinary learning is the beauty of drawing on knowledge and strategies from multiple fields. Imagine how ill prepared a nurse would be who only studied human systems. Patients are naturally more than a collection of systems. They […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-papers"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"yoast_head":"\nLearning Objectives<\/h2>\n
![\"NURS](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/NURS-8114-Other-Theories-That-Support-Nursing-Practice-Essay-300x128.png\")
Students will:<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
Learning Resources<\/h2>\n
\n
\n(Review from Week 2)
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n(Review from Week 2)
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\nTheoretical Basis for Nursing, 5th Edition by McEwen, M.; Wills, E. Copyright 2019 by Wolters Kluwer. Reprinted by permission of Wolters Kluwer via the Copyright Clearance Center. Licensed in 2020.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8114 Other Theories That Support Nursing Practice Essay<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Other Theories That Support Nursing Practice Essay<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 8114 Other Theories That Support Nursing Practice Essay<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
NURS 8114 Other Theories That Support Nursing Practice Essay Rubric Detail<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent<\/strong><\/p>\n Good<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor<\/strong><\/p>\n \n Main Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n 40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n 35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n 31\u00a0(31%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 30\u00a0(30%)<\/p>\n \n Main Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n 6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n \n Main Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n 9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n \n First Response:<\/strong><\/p>\n 9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 9\u00a0(9%)<\/p>\n 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n \n First Response:
\nWriting<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n \n First Response:
\nTimely and full participation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n 3\u00a0(3%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 2\u00a0(2%)<\/p>\n \n Second Response:
\nPost to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.<\/strong><\/td>\n9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 9\u00a0(9%)<\/p>\n 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n \n Second Response:
\nWriting<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n \n Second Response:
\nTimely and full participation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n 3\u00a0(3%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 2\u00a0(2%)<\/p>\n \n Total Points: 100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n