\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent<\/strong><\/p>\n 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/td>\nGood<\/strong><\/p>\n 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/td>\nFair<\/strong><\/p>\n 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/td>\nPoor<\/strong><\/p>\n 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nMain Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/strong><\/td>\n40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three current credible sources.<\/td>\n | 35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible references.<\/td>\n | 31\u00a0(31%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Cited with fewer than two credible references.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 30\u00a0(30%)<\/p>\n Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible references.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMain Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n Writing<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely.<\/p>\n Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n | 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Written concisely.<\/p>\n May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n | 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n Written somewhat concisely.<\/p>\n May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMain Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n Timely and full participation<\/strong><\/td>\n9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response:<\/strong><\/p>\n Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.<\/strong><\/td>\n9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 9\u00a0(9%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n | 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n | 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response:<\/strong> \n<\/strong>Writing<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response:<\/strong> \n<\/strong>Timely and full participation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 3\u00a0(3%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 2\u00a0(2%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response:<\/strong> \n<\/strong>Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.<\/strong><\/td>\n9\u00a0(9%)\u00a0– 9\u00a0(9%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n | 8\u00a0(8%)\u00a0– 8\u00a0(8%)<\/p>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n | 7\u00a0(7%)\u00a0– 7\u00a0(7%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response:<\/strong> \n<\/strong>Writing<\/strong><\/td>\n6\u00a0(6%)\u00a0– 6\u00a0(6%)<\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response:<\/strong> \n<\/strong>Timely and full participation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 4\u00a0(4%)\u00a0– 4\u00a0(4%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 3\u00a0(3%)\u00a0– 3\u00a0(3%)<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 2\u00a0(2%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTotal Points: 100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |