Main Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\nResponse to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)<\/p>\n Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three current credible sources.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)<\/p>\n Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible references.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)<\/p>\n Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Cited with fewer than two credible references.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)<\/p>\n Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).<\/p>\n Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible references.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMain Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n Writing<\/td>\n Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely.<\/p>\n Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Written concisely.<\/p>\n May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.<\/p>\n Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Written somewhat concisely.<\/p>\n May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMain Posting:<\/strong><\/p>\n Timely and full participation<\/td>\n Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)<\/p>\n Posts main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post main Discussion by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response:<\/strong><\/p>\n Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.<\/td>\n Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)<\/p>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response: \nWriting <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFirst Response: \nTimely and full participation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response: \nPost to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n Responds to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)<\/p>\n Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response: \nWriting <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)<\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.<\/p>\n Response is written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n Few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.<\/p>\n Response to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSecond Response: \nTimely and full participation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Posts by due date.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for full participation.<\/p>\n Does not post by due date.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTotal Points: 100 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | | | | | | | | | |