Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":8976,"date":"2021-10-18T12:01:14","date_gmt":"2021-10-18T12:01:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/?p=8976"},"modified":"2024-04-04T06:23:01","modified_gmt":"2024-04-04T06:23:01","slug":"nur-590-assignment-develop-an-evaluation-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/nur-590-assignment-develop-an-evaluation-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"

NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan<\/span><\/h2>\n

Sample Answer for NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Assessment Description<\/h2>\n

c You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.<\/p>\n

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.<\/li>\n
  2. Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.<\/li>\n
  3. Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.<\/li>\n
  4. Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.<\/li>\n
  5. Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.<\/li>\n
  6. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal \u2013 Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.<\/p>\n

    You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.<\/p>\n

    Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.<\/p>\n

    \"NUR
    NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.<\/p>\n

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.<\/p>\n

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.<\/p>\n

    Resources<\/strong><\/h2>\n

    Collapse All<\/h4>\n

    Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative<\/p>\n

    Read “Evaluation of Bedside Shift Report: A Research and Evidence-Based Practice Initiative,” by Schirm, Banz, Swartz, and Richmo<\/p>\n

    …\u00a0Read More<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org\/science\/article\/pii\/S0897189717301118#s0030<\/a><\/p>\n

    Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice<\/p>\n

    Read “Reliability and Validity: Linking Evidence to Practice,” by Kamper, from\u00a0Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical The<\/em><\/p>\n

    …\u00a0Read More<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org\/10.2519\/jospt.2019.0702<\/a><\/p>\n

    Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences<\/p>\n

    Read “Comparing Clinical Significance and Statistical Significance – Similarities and Differences,” by Zbrog (2021), located on t<\/p>\n

    …\u00a0Read More<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/www.mhaonline.com\/faq\/clinical-vs-statistical-significance<\/a><\/p>\n

    Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession<\/p>\n

    Review Chapter 20 in\u00a0Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.<\/em><\/p>\n

    View Resource<\/p>\n

    Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement\/Innovation Posters<\/p>\n

    Read “Research, Evidence-Based Practice, and Clinical Improvement\/Innovation Posters” (2015), from\u00a0AORN Journal<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/lopes.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=http:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109809571&site=eds-live&scope=site<\/a><\/p>\n

    A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing<\/p>\n

    Read “A Practical Definition of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing,” by Stannard, from\u00a0Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing<\/em><\/p>\n

    Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Develop an Evaluation Plan<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n

    …\u00a0Read More<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org\/science\/article\/pii\/S1089947219303181<\/a><\/p>\n

    Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What Is Taught and How It I s Measured<\/p>\n

    Read “Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review of What is Taught and How it is Measured,” by<\/p>\n

    …\u00a0Read More<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/lopes.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/www-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org\/scholarly-journals\/evidence-based-practice-educational-intervention\/docview\/2089734479\/se-2?accountid=7374<\/a><\/p>\n

    Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice<\/p>\n

    Read Chapter 4 and review Chapter 3 in\u00a0Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.<\/em><\/p>\n

    View Resource<\/p>\n

    Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice<\/p>\n

    Review Chapter 25 in\u00a0Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.<\/em><\/p>\n

    View Resource<\/p>\n

    Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    Collapse All<\/p>\n

    Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    14.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

    Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

    Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      14.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

      Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        13.25\u00a0points<\/p>\n

        Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          12.67\u00a0points<\/p>\n

          Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            11.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

            Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.<\/p>\n

              \n
            1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

              Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.<\/p>\n

              Data Collection Tools<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

              Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              Data Collection Tools<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  11.04\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                  A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    10.56\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                    A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed.<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      9.6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                      A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                        A data collection tool is not discussed.<\/p>\n

                        Statistical Test for Project<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                        Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                        Statistical Test for Project<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                          A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.<\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            11.04\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                            A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              10.56\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                              A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.<\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                9.6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.<\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                  A statistical test is omitted.<\/p>\n

                                  Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                  12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                  Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                  Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool<\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    12\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                    Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.<\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      11.04\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                      Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        10.56\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                        Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.<\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          9.6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                          Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.<\/p>\n

                                            \n
                                          1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                            0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                            Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.<\/p>\n

                                            Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                            14.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                            Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                            Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive<\/p>\n

                                              \n
                                            1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                              14.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                              Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

                                                \n
                                              1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                13.25\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.<\/p>\n

                                                  \n
                                                1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                  12.67\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                  General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.<\/p>\n

                                                    \n
                                                  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                    11.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                    Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.<\/p>\n

                                                      \n
                                                    1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                      0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                      Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.<\/p>\n

                                                      Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                      13.2\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                      Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                      Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution<\/p>\n

                                                        \n
                                                      1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                        13.2\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                        Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.<\/p>\n

                                                          \n
                                                        1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                          12.14\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                          Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.<\/p>\n

                                                            \n
                                                          1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                            11.62\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                            General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.<\/p>\n

                                                              \n
                                                            1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                              10.56\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                              Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.<\/p>\n

                                                                \n
                                                              1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.<\/p>\n

                                                                Required Sources<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                Required Sources<\/p>\n

                                                                  \n
                                                                1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                  6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                  Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.<\/p>\n

                                                                    \n
                                                                  1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                    5.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                    Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.<\/p>\n

                                                                      \n
                                                                    1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                      5.28\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                      Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.<\/p>\n

                                                                        \n
                                                                      1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                        4.8\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                        Number of required sources is only partially met.<\/p>\n

                                                                          \n
                                                                        1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                          0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                          Sources are not included.<\/p>\n

                                                                          Thesis Development and Purpose<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                          8.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                          Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                          Thesis Development and Purpose<\/p>\n

                                                                            \n
                                                                          1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                            8.4\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                            Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/p>\n

                                                                              \n
                                                                            1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                              7.73\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                              Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/p>\n

                                                                                \n
                                                                              1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                7.39\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/p>\n

                                                                                  \n
                                                                                1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                  6.72\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                  Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n
                                                                                  1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                    0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Argument Logic and Construction<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                    9.6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                    Argument Logic and Construction<\/p>\n

                                                                                      \n
                                                                                    1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                      9.6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                      Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n

                                                                                        \n
                                                                                      1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                        8.83\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                        Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n

                                                                                          \n
                                                                                        1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                          8.45\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                          Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/p>\n

                                                                                            \n
                                                                                          1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                            7.68\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                            Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/p>\n

                                                                                              \n
                                                                                            1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                              0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                              6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                              Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                \n
                                                                                              1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                  \n
                                                                                                1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                  5.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                  Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                    \n
                                                                                                  1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                    5.28\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                      \n
                                                                                                    1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                      4.8\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                      Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                        \n
                                                                                                      1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                        0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                        Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                        Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                                        6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                        Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                                        Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                          \n
                                                                                                        1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                          6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                          Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                            \n
                                                                                                          1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                            5.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                            Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              \n
                                                                                                            1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                              5.28\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                \n
                                                                                                              1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                4.8\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                All format elements are correct.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  \n
                                                                                                                1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                  0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Documentation of Sources<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                                                  6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Criteria Description<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                                                  Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                    \n
                                                                                                                  1. 5: Excellent<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                    6\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      \n
                                                                                                                    1. 4: Good<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                      5.52\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                        \n
                                                                                                                      1. 3: Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                        5.28\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                        Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n
                                                                                                                        1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                          4.8\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            \n
                                                                                                                          1. 1: Unsatisfactory<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                            0\u00a0points<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Sources are not documented.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Lopes Write Policy<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                                                                                                                            For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a \u201cfinal submit\u201d to me.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else\u2019s thoughts more than your own?<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Late Policy<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                                                                                                                            The university\u2019s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Communication<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                                                                                                                            Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Important information for writing discussion questions and participation<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                                                                                                                            Welcome to class<\/strong><\/h3>\n

                                                                                                                            Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the \u201cmessage\u201d icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God\u2019s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Hi Class,<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Contact me if you have any questions.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            Important information on Writing a Discussion Question<\/strong><\/h2>\n