Study Materials. NUR 514 APA Assignment Leadership Style Reflective Essay<\/strong><\/h3>\nSummary of Self-Assessment Results\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 10.0%\u00a0\u00a0 A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is not included.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is present. A summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is clearly provided and well developed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A comprehensive summary of why each self-assessment was selected and the results obtained on each assessment is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Leadership Style Reflective Essay NUR 514<\/p>\n
Areas for Self-Improvement, Including Steps to Improve Leadership Capabilities\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 20.0%\u00a0\u00a0 A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is not included. A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is present.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is clearly provided and well developed.\u00a0\u00a0 A comprehensive discussion of areas for self-improvement, including steps to improve leadership capabilities, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Leadership Style Reflective Essay NUR 514<\/p>\n
A Specific Leadership Style That You Believe Aligns With Your Philosophy of Care, Including Appeal\u00a0\u00a0 20.0%\u00a0\u00a0 A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is not included.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.\u00a0 A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is present. A discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is clearly provided and well developed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A comprehensive discussion of a specific leadership style that you believe aligns with your philosophy of care, including appeal, is thoroughly developed with supporting detail<\/p>\n
Reflection on How to Incorporate Elements of the Leadership Style\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 15.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is not included.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is present. A reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is clearly provided and well developed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A comprehensive reflection on how to incorporate elements of the leadership style is thoroughly developed with supporting details.<\/p>\n
Required Sources \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sources are not included.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Number of required sources is only partially met.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.<\/p>\n
Organization and Effectiveness\u00a0 20.0%<\/p>\n
Thesis Development and Purpose\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/p>\n
Argument Logic and Construction\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.\u00a0\u00a0 Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. \u00a0 Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/p>\n
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/p>\n
Format 10.0%<\/p>\n
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 All format elements are correct.<\/p>\n
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0%\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sources are not documented.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Leadership Style Reflective Essay NUR 514<\/p>\n
RUBRIC ASSIGNMENT<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\nNUR 514 APA Assignment Leadership Style Reflective Essay Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\nVery good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\nAcceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\nInadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n 68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\nDeficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nFailing level<\/strong><\/p>\n of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/p>\n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |