Assignment\u00a0 In what ways might different perspectives on quality nursing be welcome in a healthcare setting<\/figcaption><\/figure>\ncollaborative environment.<\/p>\n
Candidate C went to the same nursing school as you and, as you speak, you realize your social networks overlap as you know many of the same people, professionally and personally. This candidate lacks several of the necessary competencies for this position.<\/p>\n
Consider the challenge of assessing both fit and technical qualifications when interviewing candidates and making hiring decisions. Are there situations where there is a tradeoff between fit and technical qualifications? If so, how might such a situation present itself?<\/p>\n
Reflect on the potential for rater bias in this scenario. To what extent would you be drawn to the candidate with whom you can best identify? How do you assess the truthfulness of a candidate\u2019s responses to questions? How much would you consider other explanations, such as nervousness, in assessing why the first candidate did not seem like a team player? How do you assess the validity of the interview information, including how you weigh different selection criteria?<\/p>\n
Decide which candidate you would hire, and why.<\/p>\n
Consider your reasoning for not hiring each of the other candidates.<\/p>\n
By Day 3 of Week 1<\/h3>\nPost the following:<\/h4>\n
A brief explanation of which candidate you would hire, and why. Explain what qualities you would give the most consideration and how your hiring decision relates to either good fit or bad fit for the organization. Also, explain your strategies for assessing the validity of interview information and for avoiding rater bias. Be specific and provide examples, with support from the Learning Resources or other current literature.<\/p>\n
Read a selection of your colleagues\u2019 responses.<\/h3>\nBy Day 6 of Week 1<\/h4>\n
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by explaining how your understanding of bias influences or contributes to potential challenges in hiring applicants for an organization. Describe any possible bias you detect in a colleague\u2019s hiring decision and your reasoning. Support your conclusions with the Learning Resources or other current literature.<\/p>\n
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues\u2019 postings. Begin by clicking on the Post to Discussion Question link, and then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!<\/p>\n
Assignment\u00a0 In what ways might different perspectives on quality nursing be welcome in a healthcare setting Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n| 100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Very good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Acceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Inadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n 68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Deficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n| Failing level<\/strong><\/p>\n of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n| <\/td>\n | \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Application of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Interactive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\n Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nThe peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nResponses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Demonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Grammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\n Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\nError is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n The following was present:<\/p>\n \n- 10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n The following was present:<\/p>\n \n- 13 – 15 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
![\"Assignment\u00a0](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Assignment-In-what-ways-might-different-perspectives-on-quality-nursing-be-welcome-in-a-healthcare-setting-300x144.png\")
<\/a>