Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":73073,"date":"2023-04-28T16:39:24","date_gmt":"2023-04-28T16:39:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/?p=73073"},"modified":"2024-04-01T10:50:05","modified_gmt":"2024-04-01T10:50:05","slug":"nrs-451v-week-3-assessment-benchmark-executive-summary-new","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/nrs-451v-week-3-assessment-benchmark-executive-summary-new\/","title":{"rendered":"NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW"},"content":{"rendered":"

NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW<\/span><\/h2>\n

Sample Answer for NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\n

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative<\/a>, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The purpose of the program or project.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The target population or audience.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The benefits of the program or project<\/strong><\/p>\n

The cost or budget justification.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.
\nShare your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026 believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?<\/strong><\/p>\n

What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Submit the written proposal along with the \u201cExecutive Summary Feedback Form.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Title: <\/strong> NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW<\/strong><\/h2>\n

There are many quality improvement initiatives in healthcare. Some of the most common ones include Six Sigma, Lean, and Total Quality Management (TQM). Six Sigma is a data-driven methodology that aims to improve the quality of products and services. It uses a set of tools and techniques to measure defects and identify ways to reduce them. Lean is a process improvement approach that aims to eliminate waste and increase efficiency. It focuses on eliminating steps or activities that do not add value to a product or service. TQM is a management philosophy that promotes the pursuit of excellence in all areas of business operations. It emphasizes continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and teamwork. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation, including target population, benefits, cost, and the basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.<\/p>\n

Main Problem<\/strong><\/h2>\n

In my healthcare settings, incomplete or illegible documentation continues to be a major problem that requires improvement. One potential solution is improved electronic medical record documentation. Incomplete physician notes are the leading cause of malpractice claims, and account for almost half of all paid malpractice claims. In my healthcare organization, incomplete or illegible documentation lead to miscommunication and errors. For example, if a doctor’s notes are incomplete or illegible, another doctor may not be able to understand them and could end up prescribing the wrong medication or performing the wrong procedure.<\/p>\n

Solution to the Problem<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Improved electronic medical record documentation is one way to help mitigate the problems caused by incomplete or illegible documentation. With accurate and complete patient information, clinicians can deliver consistent healthcare services to patients. Electronic health records (EHRs) can help improve the accuracy and completeness of patient information. EHRs can also help reduce the amount of time clinicians spend on documentation, which can free up time to provide more patient care. Improved electronic medical record documentation is a quality improvement initiative that will ensure proper and accurate information.<\/p>\n

Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is to improve electronic medical record documentation by reducing the number of incomplete or illegible documentation. The goal of this initiative is to improve patient care by ensuring that all information pertinent to the patient’s care is documented in the electronic medical record (Fazio et al., 2020). Incomplete or illegible documentation can lead to errors in treatment, which can potentially have adverse impacts on patients. By improving electronic medical record documentation, we can ensure that all information pertinent to a patient’s care is available when it is needed most (Gandrup et al., 2020). This will help us provide the highest level of care possible for our patients.<\/p>\n

Target Population or Audience<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The target population for a quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation would be healthcare professionals who are responsible for providing patient care. This would include physicians, nurses, and other clinical staff. The goal of the initiative would be to improve the accuracy and completeness of medical records documentation (Fitzgerald et al., 2021). This would ultimately improve patient care by ensuring that all relevant information is available to healthcare professionals when making decisions about treatment plans. It would also help to ensure that patients receive appropriate care based on the most current information available.<\/p>\n

Benefits of the Quality Improvement Initiative<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The benefits of the quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation include: A reduction in medical errors and adverse drug events, improved patient care and safety, efficient and accurate communication between providers, time savings for clinicians, and reduced costs for healthcare providers. Improved EMR can help to ensure that all members of the healthcare team have accurate and up-to-date information about a patient’s medical history, medications, and allergies. This can help to reduce the risk of medical errors, which can potentially lead to serious injury or even death. EMR also makes it easier for healthcare professionals to track patients’ progress over time and to identify any potential problems early on. This can lead to more timely and effective treatment plans, which in turn results in improved patient care.<\/p>\n

The Cost or Budget Justification<\/strong><\/h2>\n

A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that improved electronic medical record documentation, or “EHR use”, can result in significant cost savings for healthcare organizations. The study was conducted over a two-year period and found that EHR use led to a 11.8% reduction in hospital admissions and a 13.6% reduction in total hospital costs. The study also found that increased EHR use was associated with reductions in both length of stay and costs for patients who were admitted to the hospital.<\/p>\n

The overall cost of this project will be $36,000,000 on the lower side and $49,500,000 on the higher side. The breakdown is as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Cost Category for EMR Improvement<\/strong><\/td>\nStart-up Costs per bed-low ($)<\/strong><\/td>\nStart-up Costs per bed-high ($)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
External IT Consulting<\/td>\n26,000<\/td>\n30,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hardware<\/td>\n14,000<\/td>\n25,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clinical Software Licenses<\/td>\n15,000<\/td>\n20,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
External Training Services<\/td>\n10,000<\/td>\n12,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Other Software Licenses<\/td>\n5,000<\/td>\n7,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Internal IT Support<\/td>\n2,000<\/td>\n5,000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total <\/strong><\/td>\n72,000<\/strong><\/td>\n99,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Bed Capacity<\/td>\n500<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Grand Total <\/strong><\/td>\n36,000,000<\/strong><\/td>\n49,500,000<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Interprofessional Collaboration Required For the<\/strong> Quality Improvement Initiative<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Interprofessional collaboration is key for the success of any quality improvement initiative. In order to improve electronic medical record documentation, all healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s care will work together to create and implement a plan that meets the specific needs of each individual patient (Tajirian et al., 2020). There is also the need for collaboration with external organizations and partners to ensure the implementation of all the processes required. By involving all members of the healthcare team, one can ensure that everyone has a shared understanding of the patient’s care plan and are able to properly document all interventions and treatments in the EMR (Sutton et al., 2020). This improved documentation will help to improve patient care overall and ensure that all members of the healthcare team are working towards the same goal.<\/p>\n

The Basis for Evaluating a Quality Improvement Initiative<\/strong><\/h2>\n

There are a few key factors that will be considered when evaluating the quality of an electronic medical record documentation improvement initiative. First, it will be important to look at how the new system is being used by clinicians – is it making their lives easier or more difficult? If it is making their lives more difficult, then the initiative is not likely to be successful in the long run. Second, the implementation team will look at how well the system is capturing patient data (Sutton et al., 2020) and to determine whether sufficient information in the records are available to support clinical decision-making. Other question that will be asked when evaluating the quality improvement initiative will be: Are all of the necessary fields being completed, and are they populated with accurate data? If not, then there will be problems downstream when the data is analyzed for quality improvement purposes.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n

A quality improvement initiative involving improved electronic medical record documentation can have a number of benefits, including: improved patient care, increased efficiency and accuracy in data entry, reduced administrative costs, and enhanced overall quality of care. Anytime a change is introduced to a given process, it is important to evaluate the impact of those changes. In this case, you’re talking about introducing an electronic medical record documentation system. There are a number of factors to consider when evaluating the impact of such a change.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>References<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Fazio, S., Doroy, A., Da Marto, N., Taylor, S., Anderson, N., Young, H. M., & Adams, J. Y. (2020). Quantifying mobility in the ICU: Comparison of electronic health record documentation and accelerometer-based sensors to clinician-annotated video.\u00a0Critical care explorations<\/em>,\u00a02<\/em>(4). https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC7188433\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Fitzgerald, M. P., Kaufman, M. C., Massey, S. L., Fridinger, S., Prelack, M., Ellis, C., … & Hagopian, S. (2021). Assessing seizure burden in pediatric epilepsy using an electronic medical record\u2013based tool through a common data element approach.\u00a0Epilepsia<\/em>,\u00a062<\/em>(7), 1617-1628. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/epi.16934<\/a><\/p>\n

Gandrup, J., Li, J., Izadi, Z., Gianfrancesco, M., Ellingsen, T., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2020). Three quality improvement initiatives and performance of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures in electronic health records: results from an interrupted time series study.\u00a0Arthritis care & research<\/em>,\u00a072<\/em>(2), 283-291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acr.23848<\/a><\/p>\n

Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success.\u00a0NPJ digital medicine<\/em>,\u00a03<\/em>(1), 1-10. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41746-020-0221-y<\/a><\/p>\n

Tajirian, T., Stergiopoulos, V., Strudwick, G., Sequeira, L., Sanches, M., Kemp, J., … & Jankowicz, D. (2020). The influence of electronic health record use on physician burnout: cross-sectional survey.\u00a0Journal of medical Internet research<\/em>,\u00a022<\/em>(7), e19274. https:\/\/www.jmir.org\/2020\/7\/e19274\/PDF<\/a><\/p>\n

Late Policy<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The university\u2019s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.<\/p>\n

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.<\/p>\n

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.<\/p>\n

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.<\/p>\n

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.<\/p>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 451V Week 3 Assessment Benchmark Executive Summary NEW\"NRS<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h4>\n

Communication<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:<\/p>\n

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.<\/p>\n

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.<\/p>\n

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Welcome to class<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the \u201cmessage\u201d icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to<\/p>\n

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.<\/p>\n

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.<\/p>\n

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.<\/p>\n

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.<\/p>\n

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.<\/p>\n

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God\u2019s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!<\/p>\n

Hi Class,<\/p>\n

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.<\/p>\n

Contact me if you have any questions.<\/p>\n

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question<\/strong><\/h2>\n