When seeking to identify a patient\u2019s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools; however, different factors affect the validity and reliability of the results produced by these tests or tools. Nurses must be aware of these factors in order to select the most appropriate test or tool and to accurately interpret the results.<\/p>\n
Not only do these diagnostic tests affect adults, body measurements can provide a general picture of whether a child is receiving adequate nutrition or is at risk for health issues. These data, however, are just one aspect to be considered. Lifestyle, family history, and culture\u2014among other factors\u2014are also relevant. That said, gathering and communicating this information can be a delicate process.<\/p>\n
For this Assignment, you will consider the validity and reliability of different assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You will explore issues such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. You will also consider examples of children with various weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information and encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children\u2019s health and weight.<\/p>\n
To Prepare<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- Review this week\u2019s Learning Resources and consider factors that impact the validity and reliability of various assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You also will review examples of pediatric patients and their families as it relates to BMI.<\/li>\n
- By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following Assignment options by your Instructor: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests (option 1), or Child Health Case (Option 2).\u00a0Note:<\/strong> Please see the \u201cCourse Announcements\u201d section of the classroom for your assignments from your Instructor.<\/li>\n
- Search the Walden Library and credible sources for resources explaining the tool or test you were assigned. What is its purpose, how is it conducted, and what information does it gather?<\/li>\n
- Also, as you search the Walden library and credible sources, consider what the literature discusses regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, ethical dilemmas, and controversies related to the test or tool.<\/li>\n
- If you are assigned Assignment Option 2 (Child), consider what health issues and risks may be relevant to the child in the health example.\n
\n- Based on the risks you identified, consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child\u2019s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.<\/li>\n
- Consider how you could encourage parents or caregivers to be proactive toward the child\u2019s health.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\nAssignment<\/strong> (3\u20134 pages, not including title and reference pages):<\/strong><\/p>\nAssignment Option 1: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests:<\/strong><\/h3>\nInclude the following:<\/p>\n
\n- A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.\n
\n- What is its purpose?<\/li>\n
- How is it conducted?<\/li>\n
- What information does it gather?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool\u2019s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Include references in appropriate APA formatting.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignment Option 2: Child Health Case:<\/strong><\/h2>\nInclude the following:<\/p>\n
\n- An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.<\/li>\n
- Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.<\/li>\n
- Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child\u2019s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.<\/li>\n
- Taking into account the parents\u2019 and caregivers\u2019 potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.<\/li>\n
- Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child\u2019s health and weight.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 6 of Week 3<\/strong><\/h2>\nSubmit<\/strong> your Assignment.<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/p>\nTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 3 Assignment 1 <\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy is an essential procedure that evaluates the colon mucosa for cancer<\/a>, adenomas, and inflammation. The purpose of this paper is to outline the function of colonoscopy, the procedure followed when using colonoscopy, and the information generated. The paper will also outline the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and positive predictive values of colonoscopy.<\/p>\nColonoscopy in Healthcare<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy acts as a diagnostic, elective, and therapeutic tool within healthcare settings. It is executed using a colonoscope, a hand-held flexible tube-like tool with a high-definition camera at the tip (Saito et al., 2021). The colonoscope also constitutes accessory channels that help in the insertion and fluids to cleanse the colonic mucosa and the colonoscope lens. The camera project visual data on a screen that shows abnormalities and overgrowth of the colonic wall. The data also helps in evaluating, biopsy, and removal of mucosal lesions using the accessory channels.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy Purpose<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy is indicated for various reasons. First, it is used for screening colonoscopies to assess for colorectal cancer in patients at high risks like those with a history of inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary polyposis, a family history of colorectal cancer at age <60 years, and surveillance after resection of colorectal cancer (Saito et al., 2021). Healthcare guidelines recommend starting the screening at age 45 and after every 10 years. As an elective procedure, colonoscopy evaluates symptoms like inexplicable changes in bowel habits, inflammatory colitis, GI bleeding, weight loss among the geriatrics, persistent abdominal pain, and iron deficiency anemia (Saito et al., 2021). Therapeutically, colonoscopy helps with excision and ablation of lesions, removal of foreign bodies, stenosis dilation, palliative management of known neoplasms, and handling of bleeding lesions.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy Performance<\/strong><\/h2>\nGenerally, colonoscopy can be performed in an outpatient center or within a hospital. The process duration ranges between 30 and 60 minutes. It begins with the insertion of an IV needle in the arm for pain medicine, anesthesia, or sedatives. These help to numb pain during the procedure. Once sedated, the patient then lies on a table and the colonoscope is inserted into the colon through the anus. The scope inflates the large intestines with air for clarity as the camera sends a video image to a monitor (Saito et al., 2021). The scope is adjusted for clarity and better viewing. Once at the opening of the small intestines, the scope is withdrawn as the doctor inspects the lining of the large intestines again. The process looks for the presence of colon polyps and bowel cancer to address unexplained diarrhea, blood in the stool, and abdominal pain.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n![\"NURS](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/NURS-6512-Case-Study-Assessment-Tools-and-Diagnostic-Tests-in-Adults-and-Children-300x157.png\")
NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nReliability and Validity of Colonoscopy<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy remains the gold standard for colon detection despite the emergence of new screening methods. It is safe and accurate since Mack et al. (2022) explain that it yields a 94% accuracy rate in both outpatient facilities and hospitals (Mack et al., 2022). Due to its high accuracy, experts recommend a baseline colonoscopy at age 50 and a repeat of the exam every 10 years. Colonoscopy is a reliable test because it reduces the risk of colorectal cancer by 72% and reduces mortality rates by 81% (Pilonis et al., 2020). With a high accuracy rate and higher positive outcomes, the procedure remains valid and reliable.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy reliability, sensitivity, and Positive Predictive Values<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy is a sensitive test that correctly identifies patients with colon diseases. Kadari et al. (2022) affirm that it is more sensitive compared to barium enema x-rays and \u201cvirtual\u201d colonoscopy in detecting colon polyps and cancer. The researchers calculated the sensitivity of the three imaging methods based on a per-patient, per-lesion, and per histology basis. According to the study, colonoscopy found 98% of lesions 10 millimeters or larger compared to only 48% for barium enema and 59% for virtual colonoscopy (Kadari et al., 2022). Further, for smaller six-to-nine millimeters lesions, colonoscopy identified 99% of the lesions compared to 35% for barium enema and 51% for virtual colonoscopy. For adenomas, colonoscopy detected 98% of 10 millimeters or larger adenomas compared to only 55% in barium enema and 64%f for CT colonography. Accurate detection of polyps is essential because it dramatically reduces the chances of developing colon cancer.<\/p>\n
The tool sensitivity is further confirmed by Mart\u00edn\u2010L\u00f3pez et al. (2017) who estimated that the sensitivity and specificity per patient for polyp detection in asymptomatic patients is 92.5 percent and 73.2 percent for colonoscopy, but only 66.8 percent and 80.3% for CT colonoscopy. According to Issa and Noureddine (2017), colonoscopy finds and resects precancerous lesions and neoplasia across the whole large bowel. It is also a definitive examination when other screening tests are positive. The test is relatively safe because it results in less than 1\/1000 perforation rate.<\/p>\n
For the predictive values, Issa and Noureddine (2017) outline a study among 1179 patients where 889 underwent colonoscopy. The result indicates that 253 colorectal neoplasia cases were diagnosed including 219 polyps and 35 cancers. The number of advanced adenomas diagnosed was 209. The authors calculated the predictive values of the colonoscopy to be 3.9% for cancer, 12,9% for advanced adenoma, and 25% for adenoma overall. The results were a bit dismal compared to the positive predictive value of the average risk population selected by a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Colonoscopy positive predictive rate after positive FOBT ranges from 7.5% to 10% for cancer, 15% to 27% for advanced adenoma and 32% and37% for adenoma (Issa & Noureddine, 2017). The study confirms that patients at risk of colon-related pathologies may benefit from fecal occult blood testing to select the best candidate for colonoscopy. Regardless, the optimal method remains the colonoscopy in all patients.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\nColonoscopy remains a crucial tool when diagnosing colon-related pathologies. It evaluates the large intestines and the distal portion of the small intestines. The tool used consists of accessory channels, a camera, and fluid to cleanse the colonic mucosa. It helps in screening colonoscopies, for elective purposes, and therapeutic purposes like ablation of lesions and removal of foreign bodies among others. The procedure is executed in a hospital or an outpatient and it lasts for around thirty to sixty minutes. It is safe, accurate, well-tolerated, and has a higher sensitivity. The positive predictive values are slightly lower however it remains the most ideal choice when handling issues affecting the colon.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Issa, I. A., & Noureddine, M. (2017). Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options. World journal of gastroenterology<\/em>, 23<\/em>(28), 5086. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v23.i28.5086<\/a><\/p>\nKadari, M., Subhan, M., Parel, N. S., Krishna, P. V., Gupta, A., Uthayaseelan, K., … & Sunkara, N. A. B. S. (2022). CT Colonography and Colorectal Carcinoma: Current Trends and Emerging Developments. Cureus<\/em>, 14<\/em>(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.24916<\/a><\/p>\nMack, M., Luzum, M., & Wesorick, D. H. (2022). Annals for Hospitalists-March 2022. Annals of Internal Medicine<\/em>, 176<\/em>(3), HO3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/AWHO202203150<\/a><\/p>\nMart\u00edn\u2010L\u00f3pez, J. E., Beltr\u00e1n\u2010Calvo, C., Rodr\u00edguez\u2010L\u00f3pez, R., & Molina\u2010L\u00f3pez, T. J. C. D. (2014). Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease<\/em>, 16<\/em>(3), O82-O89. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/codi.12506<\/a><\/p>\nPilonis, N. D., Bugajski, M., Wieszczy, P., Franczyk, R., Didkowska, J., Wojciechowska, U., … & Kaminski, M. F. (2020). Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after a single negative screening colonoscopy. Annals of internal medicine<\/em>, 173<\/em>(2), 81-91. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M19-2477<\/a><\/p>\n
- \n
- Based on the risks you identified, consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child\u2019s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.<\/li>\n
- Consider how you could encourage parents or caregivers to be proactive toward the child\u2019s health.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Assignment<\/strong> (3\u20134 pages, not including title and reference pages):<\/strong><\/p>\n
Assignment Option 1: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests:<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Include the following:<\/p>\n
- \n
- A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.\n
- \n
- What is its purpose?<\/li>\n
- How is it conducted?<\/li>\n
- What information does it gather?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool\u2019s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Include references in appropriate APA formatting.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignment Option 2: Child Health Case:<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Include the following:<\/p>\n
- \n
- An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.<\/li>\n
- Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.<\/li>\n
- Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child\u2019s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.<\/li>\n
- Taking into account the parents\u2019 and caregivers\u2019 potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.<\/li>\n
- Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child\u2019s health and weight.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 6 of Week 3<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong> your Assignment.<\/p>\n
Submission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/p>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 3 Assignment 1 <\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy is an essential procedure that evaluates the colon mucosa for cancer<\/a>, adenomas, and inflammation. The purpose of this paper is to outline the function of colonoscopy, the procedure followed when using colonoscopy, and the information generated. The paper will also outline the validity, reliability, sensitivity, and positive predictive values of colonoscopy.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy in Healthcare<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy acts as a diagnostic, elective, and therapeutic tool within healthcare settings. It is executed using a colonoscope, a hand-held flexible tube-like tool with a high-definition camera at the tip (Saito et al., 2021). The colonoscope also constitutes accessory channels that help in the insertion and fluids to cleanse the colonic mucosa and the colonoscope lens. The camera project visual data on a screen that shows abnormalities and overgrowth of the colonic wall. The data also helps in evaluating, biopsy, and removal of mucosal lesions using the accessory channels.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy Purpose<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy is indicated for various reasons. First, it is used for screening colonoscopies to assess for colorectal cancer in patients at high risks like those with a history of inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary polyposis, a family history of colorectal cancer at age <60 years, and surveillance after resection of colorectal cancer (Saito et al., 2021). Healthcare guidelines recommend starting the screening at age 45 and after every 10 years. As an elective procedure, colonoscopy evaluates symptoms like inexplicable changes in bowel habits, inflammatory colitis, GI bleeding, weight loss among the geriatrics, persistent abdominal pain, and iron deficiency anemia (Saito et al., 2021). Therapeutically, colonoscopy helps with excision and ablation of lesions, removal of foreign bodies, stenosis dilation, palliative management of known neoplasms, and handling of bleeding lesions.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy Performance<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Generally, colonoscopy can be performed in an outpatient center or within a hospital. The process duration ranges between 30 and 60 minutes. It begins with the insertion of an IV needle in the arm for pain medicine, anesthesia, or sedatives. These help to numb pain during the procedure. Once sedated, the patient then lies on a table and the colonoscope is inserted into the colon through the anus. The scope inflates the large intestines with air for clarity as the camera sends a video image to a monitor (Saito et al., 2021). The scope is adjusted for clarity and better viewing. Once at the opening of the small intestines, the scope is withdrawn as the doctor inspects the lining of the large intestines again. The process looks for the presence of colon polyps and bowel cancer to address unexplained diarrhea, blood in the stool, and abdominal pain.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/em><\/h3>\n
NURS 6512 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Reliability and Validity of Colonoscopy<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for colon detection despite the emergence of new screening methods. It is safe and accurate since Mack et al. (2022) explain that it yields a 94% accuracy rate in both outpatient facilities and hospitals (Mack et al., 2022). Due to its high accuracy, experts recommend a baseline colonoscopy at age 50 and a repeat of the exam every 10 years. Colonoscopy is a reliable test because it reduces the risk of colorectal cancer by 72% and reduces mortality rates by 81% (Pilonis et al., 2020). With a high accuracy rate and higher positive outcomes, the procedure remains valid and reliable.<\/p>\n
Colonoscopy reliability, sensitivity, and Positive Predictive Values<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy is a sensitive test that correctly identifies patients with colon diseases. Kadari et al. (2022) affirm that it is more sensitive compared to barium enema x-rays and \u201cvirtual\u201d colonoscopy in detecting colon polyps and cancer. The researchers calculated the sensitivity of the three imaging methods based on a per-patient, per-lesion, and per histology basis. According to the study, colonoscopy found 98% of lesions 10 millimeters or larger compared to only 48% for barium enema and 59% for virtual colonoscopy (Kadari et al., 2022). Further, for smaller six-to-nine millimeters lesions, colonoscopy identified 99% of the lesions compared to 35% for barium enema and 51% for virtual colonoscopy. For adenomas, colonoscopy detected 98% of 10 millimeters or larger adenomas compared to only 55% in barium enema and 64%f for CT colonography. Accurate detection of polyps is essential because it dramatically reduces the chances of developing colon cancer.<\/p>\n
The tool sensitivity is further confirmed by Mart\u00edn\u2010L\u00f3pez et al. (2017) who estimated that the sensitivity and specificity per patient for polyp detection in asymptomatic patients is 92.5 percent and 73.2 percent for colonoscopy, but only 66.8 percent and 80.3% for CT colonoscopy. According to Issa and Noureddine (2017), colonoscopy finds and resects precancerous lesions and neoplasia across the whole large bowel. It is also a definitive examination when other screening tests are positive. The test is relatively safe because it results in less than 1\/1000 perforation rate.<\/p>\n
For the predictive values, Issa and Noureddine (2017) outline a study among 1179 patients where 889 underwent colonoscopy. The result indicates that 253 colorectal neoplasia cases were diagnosed including 219 polyps and 35 cancers. The number of advanced adenomas diagnosed was 209. The authors calculated the predictive values of the colonoscopy to be 3.9% for cancer, 12,9% for advanced adenoma, and 25% for adenoma overall. The results were a bit dismal compared to the positive predictive value of the average risk population selected by a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Colonoscopy positive predictive rate after positive FOBT ranges from 7.5% to 10% for cancer, 15% to 27% for advanced adenoma and 32% and37% for adenoma (Issa & Noureddine, 2017). The study confirms that patients at risk of colon-related pathologies may benefit from fecal occult blood testing to select the best candidate for colonoscopy. Regardless, the optimal method remains the colonoscopy in all patients.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Colonoscopy remains a crucial tool when diagnosing colon-related pathologies. It evaluates the large intestines and the distal portion of the small intestines. The tool used consists of accessory channels, a camera, and fluid to cleanse the colonic mucosa. It helps in screening colonoscopies, for elective purposes, and therapeutic purposes like ablation of lesions and removal of foreign bodies among others. The procedure is executed in a hospital or an outpatient and it lasts for around thirty to sixty minutes. It is safe, accurate, well-tolerated, and has a higher sensitivity. The positive predictive values are slightly lower however it remains the most ideal choice when handling issues affecting the colon.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Issa, I. A., & Noureddine, M. (2017). Colorectal cancer screening: An updated review of the available options. World journal of gastroenterology<\/em>, 23<\/em>(28), 5086. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v23.i28.5086<\/a><\/p>\n
Kadari, M., Subhan, M., Parel, N. S., Krishna, P. V., Gupta, A., Uthayaseelan, K., … & Sunkara, N. A. B. S. (2022). CT Colonography and Colorectal Carcinoma: Current Trends and Emerging Developments. Cureus<\/em>, 14<\/em>(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.24916<\/a><\/p>\n
Mack, M., Luzum, M., & Wesorick, D. H. (2022). Annals for Hospitalists-March 2022. Annals of Internal Medicine<\/em>, 176<\/em>(3), HO3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/AWHO202203150<\/a><\/p>\n
Mart\u00edn\u2010L\u00f3pez, J. E., Beltr\u00e1n\u2010Calvo, C., Rodr\u00edguez\u2010L\u00f3pez, R., & Molina\u2010L\u00f3pez, T. J. C. D. (2014). Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease<\/em>, 16<\/em>(3), O82-O89. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/codi.12506<\/a><\/p>\n
Pilonis, N. D., Bugajski, M., Wieszczy, P., Franczyk, R., Didkowska, J., Wojciechowska, U., … & Kaminski, M. F. (2020). Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after a single negative screening colonoscopy. Annals of internal medicine<\/em>, 173<\/em>(2), 81-91. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M19-2477<\/a><\/p>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 3 Assignment 1 <\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.\n