NSG 3028 Assignment Identifying a Population to Study<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nthree existing prescribing quality indicators (PQI) assessing different aspects of treatment in patients with hypertension or who were overweight. We compared population level prescribing quality scores and proportions of identified patients using definitions of hypertension or being overweight based on diagnostic codes, clinical measurements or both.<\/p>\n\n\n
\n
The use of clinical measurements is recommended when PQI are used to identify undertreated patients. Using diagnostic codes or clinical measurement values has little impact on the outcomes of proportion-based PQI when both numerator and denominator are equally affected. In situations when a diagnosis is better registered for treated than untreated patients, as we observed for hypertension, the diagnostic code-based approach results in overestimation of provided treatment. The prescribing quality score for prescribing any antihypertensive treatment was 93% (95% confidence interval 90-95%) using the diagnostic code-based approach, and 81% (78-83%) using the measurement-based approach. Patients receiving antihypertensive treatment had a better registration of their diagnosis compared to hypertensive patients in whom such treatment was not initiated.<\/p>\n
NSG 3028 Assignment Identifying a Population to Study Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n| 100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Very good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Acceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Inadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n 68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\n| Deficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n| Failing level<\/strong><\/p>\n of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n| <\/td>\n | \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Application of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Interactive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\n Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nThe peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nResponses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Demonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n\n- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
- Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Grammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\n Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\nError is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n\n- 7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n The following was present:<\/p>\n \n- 10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
| <\/p>\n The following was present:<\/p>\n \n- 13 – 15 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n \n- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
AND\/OR<\/p>\n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
![\"NSG](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/NSG-3028-Assignment-Identifying-a-Population-to-Study-300x129.png\")