HCI112 1- How utilising big data improve healthcare<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\nHCI112 1- How utilising big data improve healthcare ( 250 \u2013 350 WORD ) 2- What are the benefits of E health? ( 250 \u2013 350 WORD ) PHC101 3- Discuss how primary prevention is one way to control infectious diseases, using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example and how primary prevention has contributed to disease control? ( 250 \u2013 350 WORD ) Criteria Frequency Unacceptable 0 Points Posts no discussion. Participates 1-2 times on the same day. Posts adequate discussion with superficial thought and preparation; does not address all aspects of the task. Good 2 Points Participates 1-2 times but postings not distributed throughout week. Posts well developed discussion that addresses all aspects of the task; lacks full development of concepts. Posts no followup responses to others. Posts shallow contribution to discussion (e.g., agrees or disagrees); does not enrich discussion. Elaborates on an existing posting with further comment or observation. Posts information that is off-topic, incorrect, or irrelevant to discussion. Repeats but does not add substantive information to the discussion. Posts information that is factually correct; lacks full development of concept or thought. Participates not at all. Initial Assignment Posting Follow-Up Postings Content Contribution Acceptable 1 Point Excellent 3 Points Participates 3-4 times throughout the week. Posts well developed discussion that fully addresses and develops all aspects of the task. Demonstrates analysis of others\u2019 posts; extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts. Posts factually correct, reflective and substantive contribution; advances discussion. References & Support Clarity & Mechanics Includes no references or supporting experience. Posts long, unorganized or rude content that may contain multiple errors or may be inappropriate. Uses personal experience, but no references to readings or research. Incorporates some references from literature and personal experience. Communicates in friendly, courteous and helpful manner with some errors in clarity or mechanics. Contributes valuable information to discussion with minor clarity or mechanics errors. Uses references to literature, readings, or personal experience to support comments. BIOL 102 Question: Discuss how the integumentary system maintain homeostasis<\/a>? ( 250 \u2013 350 WORD )<\/p>\n![\"HCI112](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/HCI112-1-How-utilising-big-data-improve-healthcare-300x141.png\")
HCI112 1- How utilising big data improve healthcare<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HCI112 1- How utilising big data improve healthcare<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n- Grid View<\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent<\/strong><\/td>\nGood<\/strong><\/td>\nFair<\/strong><\/td>\nPoor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nMain Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\nAnswers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\nResponds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\nResponds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\nDoes not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nMain Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\nPosts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nFirst Response<\/strong><\/td>\n17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nSecond Response<\/strong><\/td>\n16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nParticipation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\nMeets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nAs we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n
Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n- It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.<\/li>\n
- All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner.\u00a0Remember \u2013 different points of view add richness and depth to the course!<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n\n- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0Kelly.<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.<\/li>\n
- I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the\u00a0Questions to Instructor forum<\/em>. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the\u00a0Individual Questions for Instructor forum<\/em>\u00a0I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\nDiscussion questions:<\/p>\n
\n- I do not mark off for late DQ\u2019s.<\/li>\n
- \u00a0I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ\u2019s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.<\/li>\n
- Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HCI112 1- How utilising big data improve healthcare<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Responds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Posts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n Does not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\n Discussion questions:<\/p>\n Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent<\/strong><\/td>\n Good<\/strong><\/td>\n Fair<\/strong><\/td>\n Poor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Main Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n 45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\n 40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n 35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n \n Main Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n 10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n \n First Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\n 15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\n 13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\n \n Second Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\n 14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\n 12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\n \n Participation<\/strong><\/td>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n \n Total Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n \n
\n
\n