St Petersburg College Healthcare Organizations Paper<\/strong><\/p>\n Overview<\/p>\n This Field Activity Project will be completed in two assignments. The project will aid the student in providing solutions that align with a biblical worldview to problems associated with cost, access, and quality of care. The capstone project seeks to integrate the concepts, techniques, and knowledge of all areas of healthcare administration, with a focus on the application of strategic management. This field activity project, which is completed in two parts, requires students to apply what they have learned throughout the curriculum. The overall objective of the capstone course is to enable students to build upon their theoretical preparation<\/a>.<\/p>\n Each student will select an organization in which to complete a field activity. Note: The organization will remain anonymous. No part of any collection or analysis of data\/information may be utilized or published beyond the course.<\/p>\n The field activity may be part of current employment, a formal or informal internship, apprenticeship or consultant. The student may use his\/her current healthcare organization or an organization within the healthcare industry<\/a> for which he\/she is not currently employed. If the student has not been employed in a healthcare position or employed in any capacity the student should select any healthcare organization of their choosing. The specific name of the organization will not be revealed in the assignment to maintain anonymity.<\/p>\n Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:St Petersburg College Healthcare Organizations Paper<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Instructions<\/p>\n Field Activity: Role Examples:<\/p>\n The field activity may be one in which the \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0student is currently completing as part of his\/her job responsibilities in \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0a healthcare administration position. This activity \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0may be conducted in a virtual forum if face-to-face activities are \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0limited.<\/p>\n The field activity may be one in which the student is assisting in an internship or apprenticeship in a healthcare administration capacity. This activity may be conducted in a virtual forum if face-to-face activities are limited.<\/p>\n The field activity may be one in which the student is serving as a healthcare administration consultant in a healthcare facility. This activity may be conducted in a virtual forum if face-to-face activities are limited.<\/p>\n The field activity may be one in which the student collects information\/data for a \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0specific healthcare organization. This may be performed solely online, with the use of databases, via email or \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0telephone, or via virtual communication\/meetings.<\/p>\n Field Activity: Project Examples (but not limited to the following):<\/p>\n HR (staffing, performance management, scheduling)<\/p>\n Process Improvement<\/p>\n Quality Control & Improvement<\/p>\n Change Management<\/p>\n Team building<\/p>\n Marketing Strategies<\/p>\n For this assignment, the student will provide the type of healthcare administration organization selected, the summary of the field activity, role, and the timeline of the project\/activity. The student will receive feedback and permission to proceed from the faculty member.<\/p>\n Required elements include:<\/p>\n Type of Healthcare Organization<\/p>\n Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n Responds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Posts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n Does not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" St Petersburg College Healthcare Organizations Paper St Petersburg College Healthcare Organizations Paper Description Field Activity: Organization, Activity Summary, Role, Project Timeline Assignment Instructions Overview This Field Activity Project will be completed in two assignments. The project will aid the student in providing solutions that align with a biblical worldview to problems associated with cost, access, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-papers"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"yoast_head":"\nDescription<\/h2>\n
Field Activity: Organization, Activity Summary, Role, Project Timeline Assignment Instructions<\/strong><\/h3>\n
![\"St](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/St-Petersburg-College-Healthcare-Organizations-Paper-300x140.png\")
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent<\/strong><\/td>\n Good<\/strong><\/td>\n Fair<\/strong><\/td>\n Poor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Main Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n 45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\n 40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n 35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n \n Main Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n 10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n \n First Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\n 15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\n 13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\n \n Second Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\n 14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\n 12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\n \n Participation<\/strong><\/td>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n \n Total Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n