Sample Answer for NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC Included After Question<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\nDiscussion: Welcome to the Week 5 Discussion area!<\/strong><\/h2>\nPost your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.<\/p>\n
Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources<\/a> as appropriate.\u00a0Initial postings must be 250\u2013350 words (not including references).<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/h2>\nGrading Criteria <\/strong><\/h3>\nTo access your rubric:<\/p>\n
Week 5 Discussion Rubric<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6<\/strong><\/h2>\nTo participate in this Discussion:<\/p>\n
Week 5 Discussion<\/p>\n![\"NURS](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/NURS-8210-Discussion-Week-5-Nursing-and-Health-Care-Informatics-Ethics-and-the-Law-INSTRUCTIONS-PLUR-RUBRIC-1-300x111.png\")
NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nDiscussion – Week 5 Top of Form Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law<\/strong><\/h2>\n <\/p>\n
“Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should<\/em><\/p>\nbe kept secret.”<\/em>
\n\u2014Confidentiality excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath (as cited in Croll, 2010)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Traditional schools of medicine have a ritual of reciting oath excerpts such as the one above during their graduation ceremonies. Such excerpts usually revolve around a professional\u2019s promise to uphold the ideals of patient safety and confidentiality to the best of his or her ability.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\nWith the continued integration of HIT, and advances in technology such as hand-held computers, new ethical considerations have evolved within health care settings. For example, wireless capabilities can provide easier access to information from unauthorized outside parties. While technological advances have led to improvements in health care, they have also created new vulnerabilities. Doctorally prepared nurses need to be aware of ethical issues<\/a> surrounding the use of patient information, technology, and the respective liabilities.<\/p>\nReference:
\nCroll, P. (2010). Privacy, security and access with sensitive health information. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151,<\/em> 167\u2013175.<\/p>\nTo prepare:<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- Reflect on this week\u2019s Learning Resources, focusing on the ethical and legal issues associated with usage of data and health information.<\/li>\n
- For this Discussion, identify an ethical issue related to data collection or information management at your organization or one with which you are familiar.<\/li>\n
- Determine the potential liabilities that this ethical issue presents by reviewing the AMIA Code of Ethics.<\/li>\n
- Consider the legal aspects of your ethical issue and the steps that could be taken to avoid or minimize risk.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 3 post<\/strong> a cohesive response that addresses the following:<\/h2>\n\n- Describe your selected ethical issue.<\/li>\n
- Analyze the potential liabilities that this issue poses to the organization by referencing the AMIA Code of Ethics.<\/li>\n
- Formulate strategies that the organization could implement to address the ethical issue.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Read<\/strong> a selection of your colleagues\u2019 postings.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 respond<\/strong> to two<\/strong> of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:<\/h2>\n\n- Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.<\/li>\n
- Share an insight from having read your colleagues\u2019 postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.<\/li>\n
- Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.<\/li>\n
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.<\/li>\n
- Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.<\/li>\n
- Expand on your colleagues\u2019 postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Return<\/strong> to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and\/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.<\/p>\nBe sure to support your work with specific citations from this week\u2019s Learning Resources and any additional sources.<\/em><\/p>\nClick on the Reply<\/strong> button below to post your response.<\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\nHealth information technology is continually changing and evolving. A common trend within healthcare is the movement towards implementing an electronic health record (EHR) (Koontz, 2015). An EHR is a platform which will encompass patient records electronically, however, this creates conflict among various ethical principles (Layman, 2008). With the implementation of an EHR, resides the requirements to ensure that privacy of patient records and information is maintained. To provide further context, in a discussion with a practitioner, it is assumed the highest degree of confidentiality is maintained. However, once this information is placed into an EHR, it is questionable whether boundaries are dissolved as information and charts are accessible by other practitioners (Croll, 2010).<\/p>\n
The American Medical Informatics Association provides a code of ethics for practitioners to ensure ethical conduct (Peterson et al., 2018). The code references the use of health information technology and includes the expectations of members. Potential liabilities can be identified in multiple principles. Members are accountable to report issues regarding patient information and systems that could lead to a breech in privacy. This requires the nurse to be responsible for one\u2019s own actions and to be knowledgeable regarding information technology (IT) and reporting processes. Furthermore, a nurse is responsible to ensure they are protecting patient health information. This refers to accessing, storage, and oral communication of patient data. Finally, nurses are responsible to understand given technology and should note limitations and access resources as needed.<\/p>\n
To improve the above-mentioned potential liabilities, the education of staff should be considered. Staff should be aware of reporting procedures and be knowledgeable regarding how to access IT if needed. Education should also be provided regarding organizational policies and procedures that refer to privacy standards (Croll, 2010). Staff should understand their requirements when accessing patient charts that include confidential healthcare information. Information technology departments should complete random audits that provides data regarding personnel who are accessing charts. Staff should be aware that they are only to access information for those patients who are within their circle of care (College of Nurses of Ontario, 2019). Finally, it is beneficial to have trained super-users who have a good grasp of the EHR system so that they can support those who do not.<\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\nCollege of Nurses of Ontario. (2019). Practice Standard: Confidentiality and Privacy \u2013 Personal<\/p>\n
Health Information. Retrieved from<\/p>\n
https:\/\/www.cno.org\/globalassets\/docs\/prac\/41069_privacy.pdf<\/a><\/p>\nCroll, P. (2010). Privacy, security and access with sensitive health information. Studies in Health <\/em><\/p>\nTechnology and Informatics, 151, <\/em>167-175.<\/p>\nLayman, E. (2008). Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record.\u00a0Health Care Manager<\/em>,\u00a027<\/em>,<\/p>\n165-176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.HCM.0000285044.19666.a8<\/a><\/p>\nKoontz, L. (2015). Health information privacy in a changing landscape. Journal of American <\/em><\/p>\nSociety on Aging, 39 <\/em>(1), 97-104.<\/p>\nPeterson, C., Berner, E., Embi, P., Hollis, K, Goodman, K., Koppel, R., Lehmann, C., Lehmann,<\/p>\n
H., Maulden, S., McGregor, K., Solomonides, A., Subbian, V., Terrazas, E., &<\/p>\n
Winkelstein, P. \u00a0AMIA\u2019s code of professional and ethical conduct 2018,\u00a0Journal of the <\/em><\/p>\nAmerican Medical Informatics Association<\/em>, 25 (11), 1579\u2013<\/p>\n1582,\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jamia\/ocy092<\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis is quite insightful. <\/strong>Health information technology has created significant impacts in the healthcare systems. Today, most healthcare organizations rely on technology to facilitate the delivery of quality healthcare services to patients. Health information technology is continually changing and evolving (Hussien et al., 2019). A common trend within healthcare is the movement towards implementing an electronic health record (EHR). In general technology has facilitated communication processes, management of patient\u2019s data, and sharing of medical information among healthcare providers (Layman, 2018). Through the application of technology in the healthcare processes, healthcare professionals have been able to maintain high levels of ethical standards. At the same time, these technologies have created vulnerabilities in the management of healthcare delivery services. For instance, different technological products has led to increased vulnerability of data (Morilla et al., 2017). With the increased levels of hacking, cyber attackers can easily gain access to healthcare data, particularly where the systems are not property secured. Therefore, with the increase in the use of technology, healthcare providers need to ensure proper security measures to enhance protection of patient\u2019s information.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\nLayman, E. (2018). Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record.\u00a0Health Care Manager<\/em>,\u00a027<\/em>,<\/p>\n165-176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.HCM.0000285044.19666.a8<\/a><\/p>\nHussien, H. M., Yasin, S. M., Udzir, S. N. I., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2019). A systematic review for enabling of develop a blockchain technology in healthcare application: taxonomy, substantially analysis, motivations, challenges, recommendations and future direction.\u00a0Journal of medical systems<\/em>,\u00a043<\/em>(10), 1-35. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10916-019-1445-8<\/a><\/p>\nMorilla, M. D. R., Sans, M., Casasa, A., & Gim\u00e9nez, N. (2017). Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians.\u00a0BMC medical informatics and decision making<\/em>,\u00a017<\/em>(1), 1-9. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-017-0489-2<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Rubric Detail <\/strong><\/h2>\nSelect Grid View<\/em> or List View<\/em> to change the rubric’s layout.<\/p>\nContent<\/strong><\/h3>\nName:\u00a0NURS_8210_Week5_Discussion_Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Grid View<\/a><\/li>\n
- List View<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent <\/strong><\/td>\nGood <\/strong><\/td>\nFair <\/strong><\/td>\nPoor <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nRESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION<\/strong><\/p>\nDiscussion post minimum requirements:<\/p>\n
*The original posting must be completed by Wednesday, Day 3, at 11:59pm MST. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Saturday, Day 6, at 11:59pm MST. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the minimum number of posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources as well as resources available through the Walden University online databases. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; – Go beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated); -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. – Demonstrate significant ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources as well as additional resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings; -Exceed the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: -Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence.re -Demonstrate ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings -Meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses are minimally responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and\/or -May (lack) lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and\/or -Do not adequately demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources and\/or a sampling of colleagues’ postings; and\/or has posted by the due date at least in part. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and\/or – Lack in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and\/or a sampling of colleagues\u2019 postings; and\/or does not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nCONTENT KNOWLEDGE <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses: -demonstrate in-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and\/or evaluation of topic; – are well supported by pertinent research\/evidence from a variety of and multiple peer- reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; -Demonstrate significant mastery and thoughtful\/accurate application of content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses: -demonstrate understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, presented with some understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and\/or evaluation of topic; -are supported by research\/evidence from peer-reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; and \u00b7 demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses: – demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and\/or errors; \u2013lack support by research\/evidence and\/or the research\/evidence is inappropriate or marginal in quality; and\/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic – demonstrate minimal content, skills or strategies presented in the course. ——-Contain numerous errors when using the skills or strategies presented in the course<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses demonstrate: -A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course; and\/or are inaccurate, contain many omissions and\/or errors; and\/or are not supported by research\/evidence; and\/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic -Many critical errors when discussing content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses significantly contribute to the quality of the discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by: -providing Rich and relevant examples; discerning and thought-provoking ideas; and stimulating thoughts and probes; – -demonstrating original thinking, new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses contribute to the quality of the discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by -providing relevant examples; thought-provoking ideas – Demonstrating synthesis of ideas supported by the literature<\/td>\n
Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses minimally contribute to the quality of discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by: – providing few and\/or irrelevant examples; and\/or – providing few if any thought- provoking ideas; and\/or -. Information that is restated from the literature with no\/little demonstration of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses do not contribute to the quality of interaction\/discussion and thinking and learning as they do not: -Provide examples (or examples are irrelevant); and\/or -Include interesting thoughts or ideas; and\/or – Demonstrate of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nQUALITY OF WRITING <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses exceed doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Use grammar and syntax that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing; \u00b7 Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 Use original language and refrain from directly quoting original source materials; -provide correct APA \u00b7 Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 5 (16.67%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses meet doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7Use grammar and syntax that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing; ; \u00b7 Make a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 paraphrase but refrain from directly quoting original source materials; Provide correct APA format \u00b7 Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints;.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (13.33%) – 4 (13.33%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses are minimally below doctoral-level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Make more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 Directly quote from original source materials and\/or paraphrase rather than use original language; lack correct APA format; and\/or \u00b7 Are less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (10%)<\/p>\nDiscussion postings and responses are well below doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Use grammar and syntax that is that is unclear \u00b7 Make many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and –use incorrect APA format \u00b7 Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 30 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
Post your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.<\/p>\n
Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources<\/a> as appropriate.\u00a0Initial postings must be 250\u2013350 words (not including references).<\/p>\n To access your rubric:<\/p>\n Week 5 Discussion Rubric<\/p>\n <\/p>\n To participate in this Discussion:<\/p>\n Week 5 Discussion<\/p>\n <\/p>\n “Whatever, in connection with my professional service, or not in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that all such should<\/em><\/p>\n be kept secret.”<\/em> <\/p>\n Traditional schools of medicine have a ritual of reciting oath excerpts such as the one above during their graduation ceremonies. Such excerpts usually revolve around a professional\u2019s promise to uphold the ideals of patient safety and confidentiality to the best of his or her ability.<\/p>\n With the continued integration of HIT, and advances in technology such as hand-held computers, new ethical considerations have evolved within health care settings. For example, wireless capabilities can provide easier access to information from unauthorized outside parties. While technological advances have led to improvements in health care, they have also created new vulnerabilities. Doctorally prepared nurses need to be aware of ethical issues<\/a> surrounding the use of patient information, technology, and the respective liabilities.<\/p>\n Reference: Read<\/strong> a selection of your colleagues\u2019 postings.<\/p>\n Return<\/strong> to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and\/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.<\/p>\n Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week\u2019s Learning Resources and any additional sources.<\/em><\/p>\n Click on the Reply<\/strong> button below to post your response.<\/p>\n Health information technology is continually changing and evolving. A common trend within healthcare is the movement towards implementing an electronic health record (EHR) (Koontz, 2015). An EHR is a platform which will encompass patient records electronically, however, this creates conflict among various ethical principles (Layman, 2008). With the implementation of an EHR, resides the requirements to ensure that privacy of patient records and information is maintained. To provide further context, in a discussion with a practitioner, it is assumed the highest degree of confidentiality is maintained. However, once this information is placed into an EHR, it is questionable whether boundaries are dissolved as information and charts are accessible by other practitioners (Croll, 2010).<\/p>\n The American Medical Informatics Association provides a code of ethics for practitioners to ensure ethical conduct (Peterson et al., 2018). The code references the use of health information technology and includes the expectations of members. Potential liabilities can be identified in multiple principles. Members are accountable to report issues regarding patient information and systems that could lead to a breech in privacy. This requires the nurse to be responsible for one\u2019s own actions and to be knowledgeable regarding information technology (IT) and reporting processes. Furthermore, a nurse is responsible to ensure they are protecting patient health information. This refers to accessing, storage, and oral communication of patient data. Finally, nurses are responsible to understand given technology and should note limitations and access resources as needed.<\/p>\n To improve the above-mentioned potential liabilities, the education of staff should be considered. Staff should be aware of reporting procedures and be knowledgeable regarding how to access IT if needed. Education should also be provided regarding organizational policies and procedures that refer to privacy standards (Croll, 2010). Staff should understand their requirements when accessing patient charts that include confidential healthcare information. Information technology departments should complete random audits that provides data regarding personnel who are accessing charts. Staff should be aware that they are only to access information for those patients who are within their circle of care (College of Nurses of Ontario, 2019). Finally, it is beneficial to have trained super-users who have a good grasp of the EHR system so that they can support those who do not.<\/p>\n College of Nurses of Ontario. (2019). Practice Standard: Confidentiality and Privacy \u2013 Personal<\/p>\n Health Information. Retrieved from<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.cno.org\/globalassets\/docs\/prac\/41069_privacy.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n Croll, P. (2010). Privacy, security and access with sensitive health information. Studies in Health <\/em><\/p>\n Technology and Informatics, 151, <\/em>167-175.<\/p>\n Layman, E. (2008). Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record.\u00a0Health Care Manager<\/em>,\u00a027<\/em>,<\/p>\n 165-176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.HCM.0000285044.19666.a8<\/a><\/p>\n Koontz, L. (2015). Health information privacy in a changing landscape. Journal of American <\/em><\/p>\n Society on Aging, 39 <\/em>(1), 97-104.<\/p>\n Peterson, C., Berner, E., Embi, P., Hollis, K, Goodman, K., Koppel, R., Lehmann, C., Lehmann,<\/p>\n H., Maulden, S., McGregor, K., Solomonides, A., Subbian, V., Terrazas, E., &<\/p>\n Winkelstein, P. \u00a0AMIA\u2019s code of professional and ethical conduct 2018,\u00a0Journal of the <\/em><\/p>\n American Medical Informatics Association<\/em>, 25 (11), 1579\u2013<\/p>\n 1582,\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jamia\/ocy092<\/a><\/p>\n This is quite insightful. <\/strong>Health information technology has created significant impacts in the healthcare systems. Today, most healthcare organizations rely on technology to facilitate the delivery of quality healthcare services to patients. Health information technology is continually changing and evolving (Hussien et al., 2019). A common trend within healthcare is the movement towards implementing an electronic health record (EHR). In general technology has facilitated communication processes, management of patient\u2019s data, and sharing of medical information among healthcare providers (Layman, 2018). Through the application of technology in the healthcare processes, healthcare professionals have been able to maintain high levels of ethical standards. At the same time, these technologies have created vulnerabilities in the management of healthcare delivery services. For instance, different technological products has led to increased vulnerability of data (Morilla et al., 2017). With the increased levels of hacking, cyber attackers can easily gain access to healthcare data, particularly where the systems are not property secured. Therefore, with the increase in the use of technology, healthcare providers need to ensure proper security measures to enhance protection of patient\u2019s information.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Layman, E. (2018). Ethical Issues and the Electronic Health Record.\u00a0Health Care Manager<\/em>,\u00a027<\/em>,<\/p>\n 165-176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.HCM.0000285044.19666.a8<\/a><\/p>\n Hussien, H. M., Yasin, S. M., Udzir, S. N. I., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2019). A systematic review for enabling of develop a blockchain technology in healthcare application: taxonomy, substantially analysis, motivations, challenges, recommendations and future direction.\u00a0Journal of medical systems<\/em>,\u00a043<\/em>(10), 1-35. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10916-019-1445-8<\/a><\/p>\n Morilla, M. D. R., Sans, M., Casasa, A., & Gim\u00e9nez, N. (2017). Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians.\u00a0BMC medical informatics and decision making<\/em>,\u00a017<\/em>(1), 1-9. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-017-0489-2<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Select Grid View<\/em> or List View<\/em> to change the rubric’s layout.<\/p>\n Discussion post minimum requirements:<\/p>\n *The original posting must be completed by Wednesday, Day 3, at 11:59pm MST. Two response postings to two different peer original posts, on two different days, are required by Saturday, Day 6, at 11:59pm MST. Faculty member inquiries require responses, which are not included in the minimum number of posts. Your Discussion Board postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA style for format and grammar as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support the postings with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources as well as resources available through the Walden University online databases. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; – Go beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., the post contributes a new dimension, unearths something unanticipated); -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence. – Demonstrate significant ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources as well as additional resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings; -Exceed the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: -Respond to the question being asked or the prompt provided; -Are substantive, reflective, with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings and current credible evidence.re -Demonstrate ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and has read, viewed, or considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings -Meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses are minimally responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and\/or -May (lack) lack in depth, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and\/or -Do not adequately demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning -Resources and\/or a sampling of colleagues’ postings; and\/or has posted by the due date at least in part. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. They: – do not clearly address the objectives of the discussion or the question or prompt; and\/or – Lack in substance, reflection, analysis, or synthesis but rely more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. – Lack ability to generalize and extend thinking and evaluate theories or concepts within the topic or context of the discussion. -Do not demonstrate that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources and\/or a sampling of colleagues\u2019 postings; and\/or does not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts*.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Discussion postings and responses: -demonstrate in-depth understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and\/or evaluation of topic; – are well supported by pertinent research\/evidence from a variety of and multiple peer- reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; -Demonstrate significant mastery and thoughtful\/accurate application of content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses: -demonstrate understanding and application of the concepts and issues presented in the course, presented with some understanding and application of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations including analysis, synthesis and\/or evaluation of topic; -are supported by research\/evidence from peer-reviewed books and journals, where appropriate; and \u00b7 demonstrate some mastery and application of content, applicable skills, or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses: – demonstrate minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and\/or errors; \u2013lack support by research\/evidence and\/or the research\/evidence is inappropriate or marginal in quality; and\/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic – demonstrate minimal content, skills or strategies presented in the course. ——-Contain numerous errors when using the skills or strategies presented in the course<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses demonstrate: -A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course; and\/or are inaccurate, contain many omissions and\/or errors; and\/or are not supported by research\/evidence; and\/or lack of analysis, synthesis or evaluation of topic -Many critical errors when discussing content, applicable skills or strategies presented in the course.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Discussion postings and responses significantly contribute to the quality of the discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by: -providing Rich and relevant examples; discerning and thought-provoking ideas; and stimulating thoughts and probes; – -demonstrating original thinking, new perspectives, and extensive synthesis of ideas supported by the literature.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses contribute to the quality of the discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by -providing relevant examples; thought-provoking ideas – Demonstrating synthesis of ideas supported by the literature<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses minimally contribute to the quality of discussion\/interaction and thinking and learning by: – providing few and\/or irrelevant examples; and\/or – providing few if any thought- provoking ideas; and\/or -. Information that is restated from the literature with no\/little demonstration of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses do not contribute to the quality of interaction\/discussion and thinking and learning as they do not: -Provide examples (or examples are irrelevant); and\/or -Include interesting thoughts or ideas; and\/or – Demonstrate of critical thinking or synthesis of ideas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Discussion postings and responses exceed doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Use grammar and syntax that is clear, concise, and appropriate to doctoral level writing; \u00b7 Make few if any errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 Use original language and refrain from directly quoting original source materials; -provide correct APA \u00b7 Are positive, courteous, and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses meet doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7Use grammar and syntax that is clear and appropriate to doctoral level writing; ; \u00b7 Make a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 paraphrase but refrain from directly quoting original source materials; Provide correct APA format \u00b7 Are courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints;.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses are minimally below doctoral-level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Make more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; \u00b7 Directly quote from original source materials and\/or paraphrase rather than use original language; lack correct APA format; and\/or \u00b7 Are less than courteous and respectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n Discussion postings and responses are well below doctoral -level writing expectations. They: \u00b7 Use grammar and syntax that is that is unclear \u00b7 Make many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and –use incorrect APA format \u00b7 Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering suggestions, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Grading Criteria <\/strong><\/h3>\n
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Discussion – Week 5 Top of Form Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n\u2014Confidentiality excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath (as cited in Croll, 2010)<\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n
\nCroll, P. (2010). Privacy, security and access with sensitive health information. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151,<\/em> 167\u2013175.<\/p>\nTo prepare:<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
By Day 3 post<\/strong> a cohesive response that addresses the following:<\/h2>\n
\n
By Day 6 respond<\/strong> to two<\/strong> of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:<\/h2>\n
\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 8210 Discussion Week 5 Nursing and Health Care Informatics Ethics and the Law INSTRUCTIONS PLUR RUBRIC<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Rubric Detail <\/strong><\/h2>\n
Content<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Name:\u00a0NURS_8210_Week5_Discussion_Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent <\/strong><\/td>\n Good <\/strong><\/td>\n Fair <\/strong><\/td>\n Poor <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n RESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION<\/strong><\/p>\n Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\n \n CONTENT KNOWLEDGE <\/strong><\/td>\n Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\n \n CONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION <\/strong><\/td>\n Points Range: 8 (26.67%) – 8 (26.67%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 7 (23.33%) – 7 (23.33%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\n \n QUALITY OF WRITING <\/strong><\/td>\n Points Range: 6 (20%) – 6 (20%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 5 (16.67%) – 5 (16.67%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 4 (13.33%) – 4 (13.33%)<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (10%)<\/p>\n \n Total Points: 30 <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n