Explain your self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/strong><\/p>\nBe sure to identify your strengths and potential gaps in relation to these competencies.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)<\/p>\n The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/p>\n The response includes an accurate and complete identification of the strengths and potential gaps in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)<\/p>\n The response accurately explains the self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/p>\n The response includes an accurate identification of the strengths and potential gaps in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/p>\n The response includes inaccurate or vague identification of the strengths and potential gaps in relation to the nurse leadership competencies.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the self-assessment in relation to the nurse leadership competencies, or it is missing.<\/p>\n The response includes inaccurate and vague identification of the strengths and potential gaps in relation to the competencies nurse leadership competencies, or it is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nDescribe at least four goals for nurse leadership development that you would like to pursue, given the results of your self-assessment. Be specific. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)<\/p>\n The response comprehensively and fully describes in detail four goals for leadership development.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)<\/p>\n The response describes four goals for leadership development.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately or vaguely describes four goals for leadership development.<\/p>\n OR<\/p>\n The response describes less than four goals.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately and vaguely describes four goals for leadership development, or it is missing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nExplain why these goals are pertinent to your development as a nurse leader. Explain how the development of these leadership competencies support your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Be specific. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)<\/p>\n The response accurately and comprehensively explains in detail how the goals outlined are pertinent to the development of a nurse leader.<\/p>\n The response clearly and accurately explains in detail how these competencies support their healthcare organization or nursing practice.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)<\/p>\n The response accurately explains how the goals outlined are pertinent to the development of a nurse leader.<\/p>\n The response explains how these competencies support their healthcare organization or nursing practice.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how the goals outlined are pertinent to the development of a nurse leader.<\/p>\n The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how these competencies support their healthcare organization or nursing practice.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the goals outlined are pertinent to the development of a nurse leader, or it is missing.<\/p>\n The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how these competencies support their healthcare organization or nursing practice, or it is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWritten Expression and Formatting\u2014Paragraph Development and Organization: \nParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused\u2014neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/p>\n A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time.<\/p>\n Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.<\/p>\n No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: \nCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)<\/p>\n Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Contains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Uses correct APA format with no errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)<\/p>\n Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<\/td>\n | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Contains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTotal Points: 100 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | | | | | | |