Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN Included After Question<\/strong><\/em><\/h2>\nDr. Tara Harris reviews the overall expectations for Module 4. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources for your Case Study Lab Assignment and your Final exam (3m).<\/p>\n
Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns<\/strong><\/h2>\nAs an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient\u2019s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family\u2019s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?<\/p>\n
In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.<\/p>\n
To Prepare<\/strong><\/h2>\nReview the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week\u2019s Assignment. Please see the \u201cCourse Announcements\u201d section of the classroom for your scenarios.<\/p>\n
\n- Based on the scenarios provided:\n
\n- Select\u00a0one<\/strong>\u00a0scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.<\/li>\n
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?<\/li>\n
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Lab Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\nWrite a\u00a0detailed<\/strong>\u00a0one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 of Week 11<\/strong><\/h2>\nSubmit<\/strong> your Assignment.<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/h3>\nTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nEthics inform the care that nurses provide in their practice. The aim is to ensure safety and quality in addressing the patients\u2019 care needs. Therefore, this paper explores the ethical concerns involved in caring for a 47-year-old man with ulcerative colitis who has no insurance. The patient has been admitted to the emergency room with extreme abdominal pain. He has not taken his medications for last few months and does not have any medical or prescription insurance.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNecessary Information<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nThe additional information that should be obtained from the patient include symptom onset, duration, severity, precipitating, and relieving factors. Information on patient\u2019s lifestyle such as alcohol use should also be obtained, as it can precipitate the disease. Physical assessment should identify if the patient is dehydrated or not, with diagnostic investigations such as complete blood count requested since the patient is at a risk of developing anemia.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNursing Actions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nNurses and other healthcare providers act as advocates of their patients. They ensure the protection of their right to access high-quality, safe, and efficient care (Daly & Jackson, 2020; Molterer et al., 2020). Based on this, I would ensure the patient receives the care he needs despite lacking any medical or prescription insurance. Patients should not be discriminated in the care process based on factors such as ethnicity, race, or socioeconomic background.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNurses should also demonstrate ethics in their practice. This includes ensuring the protection of principles such as informed consent, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Therefore, an appropriate intervention in the case study would be protecting patient\u2019s\u00a0 right to justice by providing the care that he needs. In addition, the nurse should alleviate any pain and suffering the patient has, hence, the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Mathibe-Neke, 2020; Moreau & Rudge, 2018).\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBesides providing care the nurse should also collaborate with the social worker and link the patient with the existing insurance plans such as those in the Affordable Care Act plan. Such insurances will help the patient access the care he needs whenever he needs for ulcerative colitis. The nurse should also empower the patient about the effective management of his condition. This includes educating him about the causes, precipitating factors, and prevention (Butts & Rich, 2022; Grace & Uveges, 2022). The health education will help him take responsibility for his health. therefore, the consideration of the above interventions will promote ethics in the patient care process.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIn summary, additional information and investigations should be performed on the client. Ethical principles should guide nursing actions. Patient empowerment should be considered. The aim should be relapse prevention for the patient\u2019s optimum health and wellbeing.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReferences<\/span><\/b><\/h2>\nButts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nDaly, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). <\/span>Contexts of Nursing: An Introduction<\/span><\/i>. Elsevier Health Sciences.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nGrace, P. J., & Uveges, M. K. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Advanced Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMathibe-Neke, J. M. (2020). Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis. <\/span>South African Journal of Bioethics and Law<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>13<\/span><\/i>(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7196\/SAJBL.2020.v13i1.00690<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMolterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2020). A Practical Ethics of Care: Tinkering with Different \u2018Goods\u2019 in Residential Nursing Homes. <\/span>Journal of Business Ethics<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>165<\/span><\/i>(1), 95\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10551-018-04099-z<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMoreau, J. T., & Rudge, T. (2018). How \u201ccare values\u201d as discursive practices effect the ethics of a care-setting. <\/span>Journal of Organizational Ethnography<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>8<\/span><\/i>(3), 298\u2013311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/JOE-04-2018-0024<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n![\"NURS](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/NURS-6512-Assignment-1-Lab-Assignment-Ethical-Concerns-IN-300x141.png\")
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n <\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nImmunization is an important component of health promotion for all children in the US. All the states require that children should be fully vaccinated before they begin their education. However, 47 states consider exemptions due to religious or philosophical reasons. Vaccinations are important in preventing unnecessary hospitalizations as well as mortalities. Therefore, it would be important for nurse practitioner to seek additional information from the parents about their reasons for opposing vaccination for their son. Often, parents decline vaccinations for their children due to the influence of factors such as religious beliefs and practice. The nurse practitioners should obtain information related to the religious affiliation of the family, beliefs and practice and their influence on the uptake on immunization services (Giubilini, 2021). The information on the religious beliefs, values and practices of the family will provide the nurse practitioner with the insights into the factors contributing to the decisions that the parents are making.<\/p>\n
The nurse practitioner should also determine the knowledge and attitude of the family towards immunization. Information such as the knowledge of the parents about the benefits and risks of immunization should be obtained. The nurse practitioner should also obtained information about the fears and misconceptions that the family might have towards immunization. Low level of knowledge or misconceptions may affect the utilization of immunization services by the family (Berry et al., 2017). As a result, the nurse practitioner should educate the family about the benefits of immunization alongside the anticipated side effects. The nurse practitioner may utilize educational resources such as videos and photographs of the consequences of failing to immunize their child to increase the level of understanding of the patients (Mossey et al., 2020). Health education will help the family to make informed decisions about whether their son should be immunized or not.<\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\nBerry, N. J., Henry, A., Danchin, M., Trevena, L. J., Willaby, H. W., & Leask, J. (2017). When parents won\u2019t vaccinate their children: A qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers\u2019 experiences. BMC Pediatrics<\/em>, 17<\/em>(1), 19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12887-017-0783-2<\/a><\/p>\nGiubilini, A. (2021). Vaccination ethics. British Medical Bulletin<\/em>, 137<\/em>(1), 4\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bmb\/ldaa036<\/a><\/p>\nMossey, S., Hosman, S., Montgomery, P., & McCauley, K. (2020). Parents\u2019 experiences and nurses\u2019 perceptions of decision-making about childhood immunization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research<\/em>, 52<\/em>(4), 255\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0844562119847343<\/a><\/p>\nAssignment_Rubric<\/h2>\n\n- Grid View<\/a><\/li>\n
- List View<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent <\/strong><\/td>\nGood <\/strong><\/td>\nFair <\/strong><\/td>\nPoor <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nWrite a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number).<\/td>\n
Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)<\/p>\nThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)<\/p>\nThe response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)<\/p>\nThe response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)<\/p>\nThe response lacks and\/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)<\/p>\nThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)<\/p>\nThe response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)<\/p>\nThe response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and\/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)<\/p>\nThe response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
\nParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
\nCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,\u00a0margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nUses correct APA format with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 100 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nName:\u00a0NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric<\/h3>\n
As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient\u2019s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family\u2019s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?<\/p>\n
In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.<\/p>\n
To Prepare<\/strong><\/h2>\nReview the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week\u2019s Assignment. Please see the \u201cCourse Announcements\u201d section of the classroom for your scenarios.<\/p>\n
\n- Based on the scenarios provided:\n
\n- Select\u00a0one<\/strong>\u00a0scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.<\/li>\n
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?<\/li>\n
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Lab Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\nWrite a\u00a0detailed<\/strong>\u00a0one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 of Week 11<\/strong><\/h2>\nSubmit<\/strong> your Assignment.<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/h3>\nTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nEthics inform the care that nurses provide in their practice. The aim is to ensure safety and quality in addressing the patients\u2019 care needs. Therefore, this paper explores the ethical concerns involved in caring for a 47-year-old man with ulcerative colitis who has no insurance. The patient has been admitted to the emergency room with extreme abdominal pain. He has not taken his medications for last few months and does not have any medical or prescription insurance.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNecessary Information<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nThe additional information that should be obtained from the patient include symptom onset, duration, severity, precipitating, and relieving factors. Information on patient\u2019s lifestyle such as alcohol use should also be obtained, as it can precipitate the disease. Physical assessment should identify if the patient is dehydrated or not, with diagnostic investigations such as complete blood count requested since the patient is at a risk of developing anemia.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNursing Actions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nNurses and other healthcare providers act as advocates of their patients. They ensure the protection of their right to access high-quality, safe, and efficient care (Daly & Jackson, 2020; Molterer et al., 2020). Based on this, I would ensure the patient receives the care he needs despite lacking any medical or prescription insurance. Patients should not be discriminated in the care process based on factors such as ethnicity, race, or socioeconomic background.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNurses should also demonstrate ethics in their practice. This includes ensuring the protection of principles such as informed consent, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Therefore, an appropriate intervention in the case study would be protecting patient\u2019s\u00a0 right to justice by providing the care that he needs. In addition, the nurse should alleviate any pain and suffering the patient has, hence, the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Mathibe-Neke, 2020; Moreau & Rudge, 2018).\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBesides providing care the nurse should also collaborate with the social worker and link the patient with the existing insurance plans such as those in the Affordable Care Act plan. Such insurances will help the patient access the care he needs whenever he needs for ulcerative colitis. The nurse should also empower the patient about the effective management of his condition. This includes educating him about the causes, precipitating factors, and prevention (Butts & Rich, 2022; Grace & Uveges, 2022). The health education will help him take responsibility for his health. therefore, the consideration of the above interventions will promote ethics in the patient care process.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIn summary, additional information and investigations should be performed on the client. Ethical principles should guide nursing actions. Patient empowerment should be considered. The aim should be relapse prevention for the patient\u2019s optimum health and wellbeing.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReferences<\/span><\/b><\/h2>\nButts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nDaly, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). <\/span>Contexts of Nursing: An Introduction<\/span><\/i>. Elsevier Health Sciences.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nGrace, P. J., & Uveges, M. K. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Advanced Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMathibe-Neke, J. M. (2020). Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis. <\/span>South African Journal of Bioethics and Law<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>13<\/span><\/i>(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7196\/SAJBL.2020.v13i1.00690<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMolterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2020). A Practical Ethics of Care: Tinkering with Different \u2018Goods\u2019 in Residential Nursing Homes. <\/span>Journal of Business Ethics<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>165<\/span><\/i>(1), 95\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10551-018-04099-z<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMoreau, J. T., & Rudge, T. (2018). How \u201ccare values\u201d as discursive practices effect the ethics of a care-setting. <\/span>Journal of Organizational Ethnography<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>8<\/span><\/i>(3), 298\u2013311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/JOE-04-2018-0024<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nNURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n <\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\nImmunization is an important component of health promotion for all children in the US. All the states require that children should be fully vaccinated before they begin their education. However, 47 states consider exemptions due to religious or philosophical reasons. Vaccinations are important in preventing unnecessary hospitalizations as well as mortalities. Therefore, it would be important for nurse practitioner to seek additional information from the parents about their reasons for opposing vaccination for their son. Often, parents decline vaccinations for their children due to the influence of factors such as religious beliefs and practice. The nurse practitioners should obtain information related to the religious affiliation of the family, beliefs and practice and their influence on the uptake on immunization services (Giubilini, 2021). The information on the religious beliefs, values and practices of the family will provide the nurse practitioner with the insights into the factors contributing to the decisions that the parents are making.<\/p>\n
The nurse practitioner should also determine the knowledge and attitude of the family towards immunization. Information such as the knowledge of the parents about the benefits and risks of immunization should be obtained. The nurse practitioner should also obtained information about the fears and misconceptions that the family might have towards immunization. Low level of knowledge or misconceptions may affect the utilization of immunization services by the family (Berry et al., 2017). As a result, the nurse practitioner should educate the family about the benefits of immunization alongside the anticipated side effects. The nurse practitioner may utilize educational resources such as videos and photographs of the consequences of failing to immunize their child to increase the level of understanding of the patients (Mossey et al., 2020). Health education will help the family to make informed decisions about whether their son should be immunized or not.<\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\nBerry, N. J., Henry, A., Danchin, M., Trevena, L. J., Willaby, H. W., & Leask, J. (2017). When parents won\u2019t vaccinate their children: A qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers\u2019 experiences. BMC Pediatrics<\/em>, 17<\/em>(1), 19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12887-017-0783-2<\/a><\/p>\nGiubilini, A. (2021). Vaccination ethics. British Medical Bulletin<\/em>, 137<\/em>(1), 4\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bmb\/ldaa036<\/a><\/p>\nMossey, S., Hosman, S., Montgomery, P., & McCauley, K. (2020). Parents\u2019 experiences and nurses\u2019 perceptions of decision-making about childhood immunization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research<\/em>, 52<\/em>(4), 255\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0844562119847343<\/a><\/p>\nAssignment_Rubric<\/h2>\n\n- Grid View<\/a><\/li>\n
- List View<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent <\/strong><\/td>\nGood <\/strong><\/td>\nFair <\/strong><\/td>\nPoor <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nWrite a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number).<\/td>\n
Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)<\/p>\nThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)<\/p>\nThe response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)<\/p>\nThe response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)<\/p>\nThe response lacks and\/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)<\/p>\nThe response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)<\/p>\nThe response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)<\/p>\nThe response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and\/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)<\/p>\nThe response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
\nParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
\nCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,\u00a0margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\nUses correct APA format with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\nContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\nContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 100 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nName:\u00a0NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric<\/h3>\n
- \n
- Select\u00a0one<\/strong>\u00a0scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.<\/li>\n
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?<\/li>\n
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Lab Assignment<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Write a\u00a0detailed<\/strong>\u00a0one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/p>\n
By Day 6 of Week 11<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong> your Assignment.<\/p>\n
Submission and Grading Information<\/strong><\/h3>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/h3>\n
- \n
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Ethics inform the care that nurses provide in their practice. The aim is to ensure safety and quality in addressing the patients\u2019 care needs. Therefore, this paper explores the ethical concerns involved in caring for a 47-year-old man with ulcerative colitis who has no insurance. The patient has been admitted to the emergency room with extreme abdominal pain. He has not taken his medications for last few months and does not have any medical or prescription insurance.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Necessary Information<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
The additional information that should be obtained from the patient include symptom onset, duration, severity, precipitating, and relieving factors. Information on patient\u2019s lifestyle such as alcohol use should also be obtained, as it can precipitate the disease. Physical assessment should identify if the patient is dehydrated or not, with diagnostic investigations such as complete blood count requested since the patient is at a risk of developing anemia.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Nursing Actions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Nurses and other healthcare providers act as advocates of their patients. They ensure the protection of their right to access high-quality, safe, and efficient care (Daly & Jackson, 2020; Molterer et al., 2020). Based on this, I would ensure the patient receives the care he needs despite lacking any medical or prescription insurance. Patients should not be discriminated in the care process based on factors such as ethnicity, race, or socioeconomic background.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Nurses should also demonstrate ethics in their practice. This includes ensuring the protection of principles such as informed consent, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Therefore, an appropriate intervention in the case study would be protecting patient\u2019s\u00a0 right to justice by providing the care that he needs. In addition, the nurse should alleviate any pain and suffering the patient has, hence, the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Mathibe-Neke, 2020; Moreau & Rudge, 2018).\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Besides providing care the nurse should also collaborate with the social worker and link the patient with the existing insurance plans such as those in the Affordable Care Act plan. Such insurances will help the patient access the care he needs whenever he needs for ulcerative colitis. The nurse should also empower the patient about the effective management of his condition. This includes educating him about the causes, precipitating factors, and prevention (Butts & Rich, 2022; Grace & Uveges, 2022). The health education will help him take responsibility for his health. therefore, the consideration of the above interventions will promote ethics in the patient care process.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In summary, additional information and investigations should be performed on the client. Ethical principles should guide nursing actions. Patient empowerment should be considered. The aim should be relapse prevention for the patient\u2019s optimum health and wellbeing.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References<\/span><\/b><\/h2>\n
Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Daly, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). <\/span>Contexts of Nursing: An Introduction<\/span><\/i>. Elsevier Health Sciences.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Grace, P. J., & Uveges, M. K. (2022). <\/span>Nursing Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Advanced Practice<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Mathibe-Neke, J. M. (2020). Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis. <\/span>South African Journal of Bioethics and Law<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>13<\/span><\/i>(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7196\/SAJBL.2020.v13i1.00690<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Molterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2020). A Practical Ethics of Care: Tinkering with Different \u2018Goods\u2019 in Residential Nursing Homes. <\/span>Journal of Business Ethics<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>165<\/span><\/i>(1), 95\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10551-018-04099-z<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Moreau, J. T., & Rudge, T. (2018). How \u201ccare values\u201d as discursive practices effect the ethics of a care-setting. <\/span>Journal of Organizational Ethnography<\/span><\/i>, <\/span>8<\/span><\/i>(3), 298\u2013311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/JOE-04-2018-0024<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n <\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Immunization is an important component of health promotion for all children in the US. All the states require that children should be fully vaccinated before they begin their education. However, 47 states consider exemptions due to religious or philosophical reasons. Vaccinations are important in preventing unnecessary hospitalizations as well as mortalities. Therefore, it would be important for nurse practitioner to seek additional information from the parents about their reasons for opposing vaccination for their son. Often, parents decline vaccinations for their children due to the influence of factors such as religious beliefs and practice. The nurse practitioners should obtain information related to the religious affiliation of the family, beliefs and practice and their influence on the uptake on immunization services (Giubilini, 2021). The information on the religious beliefs, values and practices of the family will provide the nurse practitioner with the insights into the factors contributing to the decisions that the parents are making.<\/p>\n
The nurse practitioner should also determine the knowledge and attitude of the family towards immunization. Information such as the knowledge of the parents about the benefits and risks of immunization should be obtained. The nurse practitioner should also obtained information about the fears and misconceptions that the family might have towards immunization. Low level of knowledge or misconceptions may affect the utilization of immunization services by the family (Berry et al., 2017). As a result, the nurse practitioner should educate the family about the benefits of immunization alongside the anticipated side effects. The nurse practitioner may utilize educational resources such as videos and photographs of the consequences of failing to immunize their child to increase the level of understanding of the patients (Mossey et al., 2020). Health education will help the family to make informed decisions about whether their son should be immunized or not.<\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Berry, N. J., Henry, A., Danchin, M., Trevena, L. J., Willaby, H. W., & Leask, J. (2017). When parents won\u2019t vaccinate their children: A qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers\u2019 experiences. BMC Pediatrics<\/em>, 17<\/em>(1), 19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12887-017-0783-2<\/a><\/p>\n
Giubilini, A. (2021). Vaccination ethics. British Medical Bulletin<\/em>, 137<\/em>(1), 4\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bmb\/ldaa036<\/a><\/p>\n
Mossey, S., Hosman, S., Montgomery, P., & McCauley, K. (2020). Parents\u2019 experiences and nurses\u2019 perceptions of decision-making about childhood immunization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research<\/em>, 52<\/em>(4), 255\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0844562119847343<\/a><\/p>\n
Assignment_Rubric<\/h2>\n
- \n
- Grid View<\/a><\/li>\n
- List View<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent <\/strong><\/td>\n Good <\/strong><\/td>\n Fair <\/strong><\/td>\n Poor <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Write a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number).<\/td>\n
Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)<\/p>\n The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)<\/p>\n The response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)<\/p>\n The response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)<\/p>\n The response lacks and\/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n \u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. <\/strong><\/td>\n Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)<\/p>\n The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)<\/p>\n The response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)<\/p>\n The response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and\/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)<\/p>\n The response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
\nParagraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\n Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
\nCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation <\/strong><\/td>\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\n Contains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,\u00a0margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list. <\/strong><\/td>\n Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)<\/p>\n Uses correct APA format with no errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)<\/p>\n Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)<\/p>\n Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<\/td>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)<\/p>\n Contains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Total Points: 100 <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Name:\u00a0NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric<\/h3>\n
- List View<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- Click the\u00a0Week 11 Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n