{"id":35686,"date":"2023-03-15T07:57:15","date_gmt":"2023-03-15T07:57:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/?p=35686"},"modified":"2024-03-12T08:53:14","modified_gmt":"2024-03-12T08:53:14","slug":"nurs-6630-psychopharmacologic-treatments-assignment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/nurs-6630-psychopharmacologic-treatments-assignment\/","title":{"rendered":"NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sample Answer for NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment Included After Question<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

SHORT ANSWER ASSESSMENT NURS 6630 WEEK 8<\/h3>\n

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, you will likely encounter patients who suffer from various mental health disorders<\/a>. Not surprisingly, ensuring that your patients have the appropriate psychopharmacologic treatments will be essential for their overall health and well-being. The psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for patients may have potential impacts on other mental health conditions and, therefore, require additional consideration for positive patient outcomes. For this Assignment, you will review and apply your understanding of psychopharmacologic treatments for patients with multiple mental health disorders.
\nResources<\/p>\n

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.
\nWEEKLY RESOURCES
\nTo Prepare
\n\u2022 Review the Learning Resources for this week.
\n\u2022 Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments that you have covered up to this point that may be available to treat patients with mental health disorders.
\n\u2022 Consider the potential effects these psychopharmacologic treatments may have on co-existing mental health conditions and\/or their potential effects on your patient\u2019s overall health.
\nTo complete:
\nAddress the following Short Answer prompts for your Assignment. Be sure to include references to the Learning Resources for this week.
\n1. In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why? Be specific. What is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms?
\n2. List 4 predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder.
\n3. List 4 potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression.
\n4. An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least 5 symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific.
\n5. List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific.
\nBy Day 7
\nThis Assignment is due.
\nsubmission information
\nBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
\n1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial
\n2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
\n3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.<\/p>\n

Rubric
\nNURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
\nNURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
\nCriteria Ratings Pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why. Be specific. What it is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms? 13 to >11.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse…. The response accurately and clearly details which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 11 to >10.0 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nThe response accurately explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse…. The response accurately identifies which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples…. The response accurately explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 10 to >9.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse…. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate or vague examples…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. 9 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate examples, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms, or is missing.
\n13 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome List four predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder. 13 to >11.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nThe response accurately and clearly lists in detail four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 11 to >10.0 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nThe response accurately lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 10 to >9.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. 9 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder, or is missing.
\n13 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome List four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 13 to >11.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nThe response accurately and clearly lists in detail four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 11 to >10.0 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nThe response accurately lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 10 to >9.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. 9 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression.
\n13 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least five symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific. 13 to >11.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur…. Specific examples provided fully support the response. 11 to >10.0 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nThe response accurately explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur…. Specific examples provided support the response. 10 to >9.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur…. Specific examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response. 9 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur, or is missing…. Specific examples provided do not support the response, or is missing.
\n13 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific. 13 to >11.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nThe response accurately and clearly lists in detail 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia…. Examples provided fully support the response provided. 11 to >10.0 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nThe response accurately lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia…. Examples provided support the response provided. 10 to >9.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia…. Examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. 9 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia, or is missing…. Examples provided do not support the response provided, or is missing.
\n13 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >2.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\n5 pts
\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title<\/p>\n

page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 pts
\nExcellent Point range: 90\u2013100
\nUses correct APA format with no errors. 4 to >3.5 pts
\nGood Point range: 80\u201389
\nContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 to >2.0 pts
\nFair Point range: 70\u201379
\nContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 2 to >0 pts
\nPoor Point range: 0\u201369
\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
\n5 pts
\nTotal Points: 75<\/p>\n

\"NURS
NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

NURS 6630 psychopharmacologic treatments Assignment Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Performance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

100%<\/strong><\/p>\n

16 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Very good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

88%<\/strong><\/p>\n

14 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Acceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

81%<\/strong><\/p>\n

13 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Inadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n

68%<\/strong><\/p>\n

11 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Deficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

56%<\/strong><\/p>\n

9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Failing level<\/strong><\/p>\n

of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n

0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n

\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Application of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\n

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Interactive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\n

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\n

Demonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Grammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\n

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\n

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • 10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        AND\/OR<\/p>\n

          \n
        • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style does not facilitate communication<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n0 Points Deducted<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n5 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Participation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Requirements <\/strong><\/td>\n

Demonstrated the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nFailed to demonstrate the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n0 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n5 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Due Date Requirements<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. <\/strong><\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates one<\/strong> or less<\/strong> of the following.<\/p>\n