Sample Answer for Psy610 wk2 Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\nPsy610 wk2<\/strong><\/p>\nDescription<\/h2>\n\nTopic Statement<\/h3>\n
In the final week of this course, you will design an intervention to address a specific problem you have identified utilizing social psychological insight. To ensure proper preparation for this cumulative work and to provide you with an opportunity for initial feedback, this week you will identify and describe a problem using relevant theory and research. Note that the purpose of this assignment is formative. At this point, you are not expected to have a perfectly firm grasp on the material or a detailed plan for addressing a particular problem, but you should be progressing in a clear direction with regard to relevant background information and resources. Your topic statement should encompass the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Describe a problem of interest to you, personally, or that you are likely to encounter, professionally.<\/li>\n
- Relate the behaviors that contribute to and result from this social issue.<\/li>\n
- Discriminate relevant theoretical perspectives from social psychology<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Generate potential intervention strategies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Synthesize the information you have acquired from your review of the literature, guided by the above points.<\/p>\n
Conclude with a paragraph that includes questions you have, additional directions you plan to explore through your research, initial thoughts about the final paper, and any problems you are experiencing or think you might encounter.<\/p>\n
The Topic Statement<\/p>\n![\"Psy610](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Psy610-wk2-1-300x140.png\")
Psy610 wk2<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n- Must be at least 3 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center\u2019s\u00a0Introduction to APA<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate title page with the following:\n
\n- Running head<\/li>\n
- Title of paper<\/li>\n
- Student\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Course name and number<\/li>\n
- Instructor\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Date submitted<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize academic voice.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Academic Voice<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must address the topic with critical thought.<\/li>\n
- Must use at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Additional scholarly sources are encouraged.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources<\/a>\u00a0table for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize in-text citations appropriately.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Integrating Research<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Citing Within Your Paper<\/a>\u00a0guide for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style.\n
\n- See\u00a0Formatting your References List<\/a>\u00a0for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- \n
Psy610 wk2 Grid View<\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent<\/strong><\/td>\nGood<\/strong><\/td>\nFair<\/strong><\/td>\nPoor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nMain Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\nAnswers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\nResponds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\nResponds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\nDoes not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nMain Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\nPosts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nFirst Response<\/strong><\/td>\n17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nSecond Response<\/strong><\/td>\n16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nParticipation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\nMeets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n
As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n
Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n- It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.<\/li>\n
- All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner.\u00a0Remember \u2013 different points of view add richness and depth to the course!<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n\n- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.<\/li>\n
- I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the\u00a0Questions to Instructor forum<\/em>. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the\u00a0Individual Questions for Instructor forum<\/em>I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\nDiscussion questions:<\/p>\n
\n- I do not mark off for late DQ\u2019s.<\/li>\n
- I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ\u2019s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.<\/li>\n
- Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n
Description<\/h2>\n\nTopic Statement<\/h3>\n
In the final week of this course, you will design an intervention to address a specific problem you have identified utilizing social psychological insight. To ensure proper preparation for this cumulative work and to provide you with an opportunity for initial feedback, this week you will identify and describe a problem using relevant theory and research. Note that the purpose of this assignment is formative. At this point, you are not expected to have a perfectly firm grasp on the material or a detailed plan for addressing a particular problem, but you should be progressing in a clear direction with regard to relevant background information and resources. Your topic statement should encompass the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Describe a problem of interest to you, personally, or that you are likely to encounter, professionally.<\/li>\n
- Relate the behaviors that contribute to and result from this social issue.<\/li>\n
- Discriminate relevant theoretical perspectives from social psychology<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Generate potential intervention strategies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Synthesize the information you have acquired from your review of the literature, guided by the above points.<\/p>\n
Conclude with a paragraph that includes questions you have, additional directions you plan to explore through your research, initial thoughts about the final paper, and any problems you are experiencing or think you might encounter.<\/p>\n
The Topic Statement<\/p>\nPsy610 wk2<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n\n- Must be at least 3 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center\u2019s\u00a0Introduction to APA<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate title page with the following:\n
\n- Running head<\/li>\n
- Title of paper<\/li>\n
- Student\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Course name and number<\/li>\n
- Instructor\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Date submitted<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize academic voice.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Academic Voice<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must address the topic with critical thought.<\/li>\n
- Must use at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Additional scholarly sources are encouraged.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources<\/a>\u00a0table for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize in-text citations appropriately.\n
\n- See the\u00a0Integrating Research<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Citing Within Your Paper<\/a>\u00a0guide for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style.\n
\n- See\u00a0Formatting your References List<\/a>\u00a0for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- \n
Psy610 wk2 Grid View<\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nExcellent<\/strong><\/td>\nGood<\/strong><\/td>\nFair<\/strong><\/td>\nPoor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nMain Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\nAnswers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\nResponds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\nResponds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\nDoes not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nMain Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\nPosts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nFirst Response<\/strong><\/td>\n17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nSecond Response<\/strong><\/td>\n16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\nResponse exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\nResponse is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\nResponse may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nParticipation<\/strong><\/td>\n5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\nMeets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\nDoes not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTotal Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n
As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n
Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n- It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.<\/li>\n
- All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner.\u00a0Remember \u2013 different points of view add richness and depth to the course!<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n\n- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.<\/li>\n
- I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the\u00a0Questions to Instructor forum<\/em>. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the\u00a0Individual Questions for Instructor forum<\/em>I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\nDiscussion questions:<\/p>\n
\n- I do not mark off for late DQ\u2019s.<\/li>\n
- I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ\u2019s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.<\/li>\n
- Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n
Topic Statement<\/h3>\n
In the final week of this course, you will design an intervention to address a specific problem you have identified utilizing social psychological insight. To ensure proper preparation for this cumulative work and to provide you with an opportunity for initial feedback, this week you will identify and describe a problem using relevant theory and research. Note that the purpose of this assignment is formative. At this point, you are not expected to have a perfectly firm grasp on the material or a detailed plan for addressing a particular problem, but you should be progressing in a clear direction with regard to relevant background information and resources. Your topic statement should encompass the following:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Describe a problem of interest to you, personally, or that you are likely to encounter, professionally.<\/li>\n
- Relate the behaviors that contribute to and result from this social issue.<\/li>\n
- Discriminate relevant theoretical perspectives from social psychology<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Generate potential intervention strategies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Synthesize the information you have acquired from your review of the literature, guided by the above points.<\/p>\n
Conclude with a paragraph that includes questions you have, additional directions you plan to explore through your research, initial thoughts about the final paper, and any problems you are experiencing or think you might encounter.<\/p>\n
The Topic Statement<\/p>\n
Psy610 wk2<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Must be at least 3 to 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center\u2019s\u00a0Introduction to APA<\/a>.<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate title page with the following:\n
- \n
- Running head<\/li>\n
- Title of paper<\/li>\n
- Student\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Course name and number<\/li>\n
- Instructor\u2019s name<\/li>\n
- Date submitted<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize academic voice.\n
- \n
- See the\u00a0Academic Voice<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must address the topic with critical thought.<\/li>\n
- Must use at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Additional scholarly sources are encouraged.\n
- \n
- See the\u00a0Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources<\/a>\u00a0table for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must utilize in-text citations appropriately.\n
- \n
- See the\u00a0Integrating Research<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- See the\u00a0Citing Within Your Paper<\/a>\u00a0guide for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style.\n
- \n
- See\u00a0Formatting your References List<\/a>\u00a0for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: Psy610 wk2<\/strong><\/h2>\n
- \n
- \n
Psy610 wk2 Grid View<\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n\n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n Excellent<\/strong><\/td>\n Good<\/strong><\/td>\n Fair<\/strong><\/td>\n Poor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n Main Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n 45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\n Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n
35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n Responds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Main Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n 10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n Posts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n Does not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n First Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Second Response<\/strong><\/td>\n 16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\n Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n
12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\n Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\n Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Participation<\/strong><\/td>\n 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n
0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Total Points: 100<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n
As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n
Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n
- \n
- It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.<\/li>\n
- All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner.\u00a0Remember \u2013 different points of view add richness and depth to the course!<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n
- \n
- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.<\/li>\n
- I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the\u00a0Questions to Instructor forum<\/em>. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the\u00a0Individual Questions for Instructor forum<\/em>I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\n
Discussion questions:<\/p>\n
- \n
- I do not mark off for late DQ\u2019s.<\/li>\n
- I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ\u2019s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.<\/li>\n
- Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n
- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- \n
- See the\u00a0Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n
- Must utilize in-text citations appropriately.\n
- See the\u00a0Academic Voice<\/a>\u00a0resource for additional guidance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
- Must include a separate title page with the following:\n
- Generate potential intervention strategies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n