disaster management<\/a>. \n2. Appraise systems designed for emergency and disaster preparedness. \n3. Apply levels of prevention to natural and manmade disasters. \n4. Describe the spiritual considerations surrounding disasters.<\/p>\nCommunity and Public Health: The Future of Health Care<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n Read Chapter 5 in Community and Public Health: The Future of Health Care.<\/p>\n
GCU Nursing Graduate Meets Needs of Joplin<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n Read “GCU Nursing Graduate Meets Needs of Joplin,” by Carroll, from Herd on Campus (2011).<\/p>\n
Diary of Medical Mission Trip<\/h3>\n <\/p>\n
Description:<\/h4>\n View “Diary of Medical Mission Trip<\/p>\n
Instruction to the Incident Command System, ICS-100<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n Complete the “IS-100.C: Instruction to the Incident Command System, ICS-100” course on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA – 2018) website.<\/p>\n
Disaster Relief and Recovery and Services<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n Explore the Disaster Relief and Recover Services page of the American Red Cross website.<\/p>\n
Emergency Preparedness and Response<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n Explore the Emergency Preparedness and Response page of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website.<\/p>\n
Community Teaching Experience Approval<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n The “Community Teaching Experience Approval” form documents approval from the agency administrator or representative to conducting your Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation.<\/p>\n
Complete and submit this form, as directed, prior to participating in the community teaching experience at your approved location.<\/p>\n
Nursing interventions at all levels were crucial in addressing the urgent and long-term healthcare needs of the impacted people in the wake of the devastating Haiti earthquake in 2010. Preparation, training, and damage mitigation related to catastrophes take place during the before impact period . By building the framework for a planned and effective catastrophe response, interventions can be most beneficial during the “before-impact” phase (Falkner, 2018).<\/p>\n
Community members’ training in disaster response had a key impact at the primary preventative level. Public awareness of basic first aid, search and rescue methods, and disaster readiness improved the population’s capacity to react. A concentrated approach to care was also made sure by designating specific facilities for housing and supervising the affected people.<\/p>\n
Efforts at secondary prevention would involve reducing the impact of infections and injuries brought on by the earthquake. Diseases and injuries should be quickly identified and treated in order to prevent further development or recurrence. One example would be using medicines to stop the progression of wounds along with proper clean and sterile wound care.<\/p>\n
Last but not least, the Tertiary Prevention period includes both bodily and emotional rehabilitation. Here, nurses offer rehabilitation and psycho-social support. People who experience the long-lasting effects of the earthquake could struggle with their wounds or disabilities. Together with therapists and social workers, nurses provide crucial services like physical therapy, wound care, and even trauma counseling. In a bid to grant patients’ lifestyles a sense of regularity and as much autonomy as feasible, they make a concerted effort to support in their rehabilitation into their communities.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Under which phase of the disaster do the three proposed interventions fall? \nEarthquake Preparation Community Education; a component of the Preparedness Phase is this intervention. During this phase, proactive steps are taken to inform and ready communities, institutions, and individuals for future calamities. Increasing resilience and ensuring that the general people is equipped to respond and protect itself in the case of a disaster are the main goals (Yu, et.al, 2018).<\/p>\n
Then, of course, the goal of rehabilitation and psycho-social support is to help the affected population reclaim their sense of normalcy. Priorities throughout this phase’s actions include the restoration of lost services, the physical and psychological rehabilitation of those affected, and long-term catastrophe resilience.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I would seek to work with the American Red Cross due to their long established history and expertise in managing crises in a fashion that continues to inspire many volunteers. Such expertise has been demonstrated from the first two World Wars, to the most recent catastrophe in the Sudan. One must not gamble by joining organizations with a less than clear history.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Which organization do you find most competent in handling tough situations?<\/p>\n
Clinical Practice Hours \u2013 Teaching Project Form<\/h3>\nDescription:<\/h4>\n The development and implementation of a teaching plan meets the requirements for clinical competences as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN).<\/p>\n
Complete and submit the \u201cClinical Practice Hours: Teaching Project\u201d Form as indicated to document your clinical experience.<\/p>\n
NRS 428 Discussion\u00a0 Nursing Interventions Related to Disaster <\/em>Grading Rubric Guidelines<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\nProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions<\/li>\n Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nProvides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nDiscusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation\/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nDiscusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation\/evaluation.<\/li>\n The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nNo evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010<\/strong><\/td>\n9 <\/strong><\/td>\n8 <\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge –<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and\/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\nPosts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;<\/li>\n Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nPosts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.<\/li>\n Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nPosts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.<\/li>\n Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nPosts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.<\/li>\n Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content<\/li>\n Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nPosts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored<\/li>\n No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nPerformance Category <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a05<\/strong><\/td>\n4 <\/strong><\/td>\n3 <\/strong><\/td>\n2<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nInteractive Dialogue<\/strong><\/p>\nReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.<\/strong><\/p>\n(5 points possible per graded thread)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n\n\nExceeds minimum post requirements<\/li>\n Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.<\/li>\n Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer<\/li>\n Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nReplies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days<\/li>\n Replies to a question posed by a peer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nSummarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/td>\n
\n\nMeets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.<\/li>\n The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline<\/li>\n Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nHas only one post for the week<\/li>\n Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nDoes not post to the thread<\/li>\n No connections are made to the topic<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 1 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 2 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 3 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 4 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 5 Point<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Syntax, APA<\/strong><\/p>\nNote: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.<\/strong><\/p>\nPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n2-3 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\n4-5 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n Writing style is somewhat focused.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\n6-7 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\n8-10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n\n\nPost contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n Writing style does not facilitate communication.<\/li>\n The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n<\/td>\n 0 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n-5 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nTotal Participation Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\nper discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\nThe student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \nEarly Participation Requirement<\/strong><\/p>\nper discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\nThe student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"NRS 428 Discussion: Nursing Interventions Related to Disaster NRS 428 Discussion\u00a0 Nursing Interventions Related to Disaster Topic 5 DQ 2 Description: Watch the “Diary of Medical Mission Trip” videos dealing with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Reflect on this natural disaster by answering the following questions: 1. Propose one example of a nursing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nursing-papers"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"yoast_head":"\n
NRS 428 Discussion: Nursing Interventions Related to Disaster -<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n