Sample Answer for Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\nModule 1: Agenda Setting (Weeks 1-2)<\/strong><\/h3>\nLaureate Education (Producer). (2018). Meet the Experts: Pioneers in Policy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Policy Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/strong><\/p>\nLearning Objectives<\/strong>
\nStudents will:<\/strong><\/h3>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief <\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Compare U.S. presidential agenda priorities<\/em><\/li>\n
- Evaluate ways that administrative agencies help address healthcare issues<\/a><\/em><\/li>\n
- Analyze how healthcare issues get on administrative agendas<\/em><\/li>\n
- Identify champions or sponsors of healthcare issues<\/em><\/li>\n
- Create fact sheets for communicating with policymakers or legislators<\/em><\/li>\n
- Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues<\/em><\/em>\n
![\"Assignment](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Assignment-Agenda-Comparison-Grid-and-Fact-Sheet-or-Talking-Points-Brief-300x140.png\")
<\/a>Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nDue By
\nAssignment
\nWeek 1, Days 1\u20132
\nRead\/Watch\/Listen to the Learning Resources.
\nCompose your initial Discussion post.
\nWeek 1, Day 3
\nPost your initial discussion post.
\nWeek 1, Days 4-5
\nReview peer Discussion posts.
\nCompose your peer Discussion responses.
\nBegin to compose your Assignment.
\nWeek 1, Day 6
\nPost at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
\nContinue to compose your final draft of your Assignment.
\nWeek 1, Day 7
\nWrap up Discussion.
\nWeek 2, Day 1\u20136
\nContinue to compose your Assignment.
\nWeek 2, Day 7
\nDeadline to submit your Assignment.<\/p>\n
Learning Resources<\/h2>\nAssignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\nIt may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nHealthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor\u2019s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAs a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and\/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIn this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nTo Prepare:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nReview the agenda priorities of the\u202fcurrent\/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSelect an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nConsider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator\/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nUse your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nUse the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current\/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIdentify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIdentify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nRequired Readings<\/h2>\n
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse\u2019s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\n
Chapter 1, \u201cInforming Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses\u201d (pp. 11\u201313 only)
\nChapter 2, \u201cAgenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker\u2019s Attention?\u201d (pp. 17\u201336)
\nChapter 10, \u201cOverview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care\u201d (pp. 171\u2013180)
\nChapter 12, \u201cAn Insider\u2019s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities\u201d
\n\u201cCreating a Fact Sheet\u201d (pp. 217-221)<\/p>\n
DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219\u2013224. doi:10.1016\/j.outlook.2014.04.002<\/p>\n
Kingdon, J.W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting with applications. Law Review M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331)<\/p>\n
Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., \u2026 Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521\u2013530. doi:10.1016\/j.outlook.2015.06.003.<\/p>\n
O\u2019Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135\u2013148. doi:10.1177\/1527154417728514<\/p>\n
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n
USA.gov. (n.d.). A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.usa.gov\/federal-agencies\/a<\/a><\/p>\nUSA.gov. (n.d.). Executive departments. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.usa.gov\/executive-departments<\/a><\/p>\nThe White House. (n.d.). The cabinet. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the-trump-administration\/the-cabinet\/<\/a><\/p>\nDocument: Agenda Comparison Grid Template (Word document)<\/p>\n
Required Media<\/p>\n
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Setting the Agenda [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n
Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.<\/p>\n
Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?<\/p>\n
To Prepare:<\/h2>\n
Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting.
\nConsider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare<\/a> issues become agenda priorities.<\/p>\nBy Day 3 of Week 1<\/h2>\n
Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?<\/p>\n
I worked as a nurse in trauma ICU for ten years and spent the last two years in the emergency room. I have also worked as a critical care transport nurse for the last four years. Psych has always been something that has intrigued me. I just find it so fascinating and frustrating all at the same time. I am really excited to be a part of the mental health community because it is really something close to my heart. I am so glad that people are more open to talk about their mental health struggles so that other people can support them and also take comfort in knowing they are not alone in their situation.<\/p>\n
I have recently been asked to train to be a house supervisor at the hospital I work in. And I was also thinking about transferring to the psych department to get more experience of the process. I like to gain as much training as I can so that I can be a well-rounded nurse.<\/p>\n
I have struggled with going back to school because I have three small children and I work a lot so I never really thought I\u2019d have the time for it. Now I have decided that I need to make it a priority for me to do the best for myself to provide for my family.<\/p>\n
\u201cProfessional organizations typically establish a mission statement that outlines why they exist and where they are headed. \u201c (Echevarria, 2018) .\u00a0\u00a0These are important qualities to consider when choosing a professional organization that aligns with your values. \u201cProfessional organizations provide nurses with a network of experts to share clinical and administrative challenges and gain new ideas and knowledge.\u201d (Cherry, Caramanica, Everett, Fennimore, & Elaine, 2019) .<\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\nEchevarria, I. M. (2018). Make connections by joining a professional nursing organization. Nursing, 48(12), 35-38.<\/p>\n
Cherry, B., Caramanica, L, Everett, L. Q., Fennimore, L., & Elaine, S. (2019). Leveraging the power of board leadership in professional nursing organizations.\u00a0JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49<\/em>(11), 517-519.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 of Week 1<\/p>\n
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.<\/p>\n
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/p>\n
Submission and Grading Information
\nGrading Criteria<\/h3>\nTo access your rubric:<\/h4>\n
Week 1 Discussion Rubric<\/p>\n
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1<\/p>\n
To participate in this Discussion:<\/h3>\nWeek 1 Discussion<\/h4>\nAssignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/h3>\n
It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.<\/p>\n
Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor\u2019s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n
As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and\/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.<\/p>\n
In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.<\/p>\n
To Prepare:<\/h3>\n
Review the agenda priorities of the current\/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations.
\nSelect an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
\nReflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
\nConsider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator\/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.<\/p>\n
The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)<\/p>\n
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid<\/h3>\n
Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current\/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n
Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.
\nDescribe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
\nIdentify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
\nExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\n
Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis<\/h3>\n
Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:<\/p>\n
Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?
\nHow do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
\nWho would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?<\/p>\n
Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/h3>\n
Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker\/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n
Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
\nJustify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n
By Day 7 of Week 2<\/h3>\n
Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief.
\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/p>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/h3>\n
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.
\nClick the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
\nClick the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.
\nNext, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click Open.
\nIf applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
\nClick on the Submit button to complete your submission.<\/p>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Grading Criteria<\/h3>\nTo access your rubric:<\/h4>\n
Week 2 Assignment Rubric<\/p>\n
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity<\/p>\n
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:<\/p>\n
Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.<\/p>\n
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2<\/p>\n
To submit your Assignment:<\/p>\n
Week 2 Assignment<\/p>\n
Next Module<\/p>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/strong><\/h2>\nAgenda Comparison Grid Template Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2<\/h3>\n
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health\/healthcare issue your selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas. You will use the information in the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid to complete the remaining Part 2 and Part 3 of your Assignment. Identify the Population Health concern you selected. As a professional nurse specializing in substance abuse dependency, I have decided to focus primarily on the population that suffer from Opioid addiction and dependency. Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. The National Institute on Drug Abuse suggests that more than 130 people in the Unites States die from opioid overdose.<\/p>\n
Based on these findings we are able to ascertain that this issue is no respecter of persons as it cuts across all races, socio-economic status\/class, gender and creed. The economic burden is over $78 billion a year due to treatment, healthcare, costs due to criminal involvement and addiction treatment. (NIH, 2019). According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the crisis began to emerge in the 1990\u2019s. This began with over prescribing, which led to abuse and addiction. This has resulted in the current opioid crisis. (CDC, 2018) Administration (President Name) (Current President) President Trump (Previous President) President Obama (Previous President) President Bush Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. Under the Trump administrations\u2019 agenda, the agenda focus is currently sterner on opioid abusers and are well equipped with better and more advanced measures on fishing out culprits engaged in these acts. There are more strategic checks and balances that have been put in place under the current administration to limit the influx of illegal drug trafficking into the country.<\/p>\n
There are also very tight security protocols and measures on the boarders of the country which is aimed at reducing the number of people affected with opioid abuse and dependency. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Obama administrations\u2019 agenda one of the primary focus was to develop special treatment protocols for individuals suffering from opioid abuse and dependency issues and on creating incentives to ensure that there are more thorough measures in place for regulating opioid prescription by medical practitioners and dispensing means from pharmacies. Monitoring of opioid use and events located at neighborhood law enforcement stations for the return of excess drugs that have been supplied illegally within the system. Community drug dispensaries are accepting of these kinds of take back drives to support drug rehabilitation in chronic abusers addicted to drugs. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Bush administrations\u2019 agenda focused on the prevention of the crises in opioid abuse even before it commenced, the provisions of more drug rehabilitation centers and Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief infiltrating the opioid lack market system. (WhiteHouse.gov) Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue. An estimated $13 million in October 2019 was apportioned to incentives created specifically to fund the police task force in a bid to eradicate the impact of drug trafficking. A total of 12 states across 13 counties that have battled most with the impact that opioid abuse and addiction have impacted. (WhiteHouse.gov)<\/p>\n
An outline of the proposals released from the White Trump’s budget will also seek $21 billion to put toward infrastructure spending and $23 billion toward border security, including his infamous border wall. (WhiteHouse.gov) Under the Obama administration, there was a separate budget created for the 2016 fiscal year to the total sum of $27.6 billion with was a 4.7% increment compared to the year before (2017). These funds were generated to develop resources and manpower from the federal level under this administration to tackle drug trafficking in the country. Proactive measures were implemented to combat the tragic impact of the prevalent opioid crisis via The National Heroin Initiative (NHI) by focusing primarily on areas within the community that are opioid-laden. They targeted the center of the illegal opioid supply with more advanced investigative approaches by law enforcement agencies which was a huge preventative method. During The Bush era in administration, his regime, in 2003 there was an estimated total allocation of $19.2 billion raised to fund law enforcement efforts in the battle against opioid trafficking and all other criminal activities associated with drug abuse. Border patrol was also one of the primary areas that this administration focused on to reduce the supply of illegal opioids on an international scale. An allocation of $2.3 billion was set aside for this purpose and an estimated $3.8 billion was allocated to rehabilitation treatments for individuals in our society that have struggled with opioid dependency. In conclusion this administration allocated another $10 million in fostering initiatives for a program that supported the people that were most affected by opioid addiction which was The Drug-Free Communities Support Program. (WhiteHouse.gov) Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\n
The Trump Administration took on the approach of spreading awareness and education the teens and adolescents in our society by partnering The Truth Initiative and Ad Council, which was a campaign initiated to teach them on how to prevent and reduce opioid abuse and addiction. It was very comprehensive in helping young adults understand the dangers associated with addiction as well as how effective they could be in curbing the spread of this problem in various communities. This ad was designed to get the attention of the younger population in the society as it successfully has over 1.4 billion views in total when it aired. This administration declared the current opioid addiction issue a nationwide public health emergency, which has brought so much more attention to this crisis. This prompted and inspired people to become more active in the fight against opioid abuse and dependency. More intense measures were taken at the boarders to intensify the patrol and security measures to avoid smuggling drugs illegally into the country. There have also been measures taken to ensure that opioid prescriptions ate regulated thoroughly, by introducing a Safer Prescribing Plan that will reduce any opioid refill prescription by 1\/3 in the next 3 years. Finally, the administration is that will cut opioid prescription fills by one-third within three years.<\/p>\n
Finally, the administration has been a strong proponent for vaccines that prevent opioid addiction. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Obama administration offered health care coverage plans that were mandatory for individuals battling with opioid abuse and addiction. This was able to facilitate their treatment regimen and made provision for naloxone, a drug of choice administered to patients that have been suspected of high levels of Opioid-Induced complications. This administration also strengthens efforts at combating drug trafficking which drastically reduces opioid overdoses and deaths. The White House National Drug Control Strategy devised a strategic plan based on evidence-based practices that aims at controlling opioid addiction and substance abuse. The primary goal of this approach was focused on public health, by creating programs that encourage the safe and proper use of opioids and comprehensive treatment plan for this suffering from opioid dependency. Finally, the administration encouraged clinicians and their stakeholders to collaborate effectively in the implementation of more structured protocols while prescribing opioid to the right patients. (WhiteHouse.gov) The primary objective of the Bush administration\u2019s focus on the issue of opioid addiction was to get the individuals suffering focused on getting people into treatment.<\/p>\n
This was a focus on \u201ccompassionate Coercion\u201d which begins with family and friends. The focus was on prevention and seeking help for the addict along with using the criminal justice system as a deterrent for getting people into programs. The administration focused on confrontation to heal the addict. Guidance was sought from family, friends, the workplace and places of worship. (WhiteHouse.gov) Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis Using the information, you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health\/healthcare issue your selected Administration (President Name) (Current President) (Previous President) (Previous President) Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? The Trump administration has made collaborative efforts in cross boarder internationally to establish more through security measures in partnerships with law enforcements that have proved to be effective in treating and preventing opioid abuse and addiction. There are specialized training sessions on a regular basis offered by federal agencies to assist clinicals in treatment of patients with opioid addiction, ensure that the stand of practice in treating these patients met the national guidelines requirements, and encourage long term rehabilitation. There are also measures set in place to inspect drug rehabilitation programs in an effort to improve the. Quality of care provided and patient satisfaction<\/p>\n
This has led to a drastic reduction of cases involved in drug related offences and criminal activities. The United States Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) plays an important role in regulating the dispensing, regulation and control of opioids and narcotics among users. There are very harsh and severe penalties for individuals that are caught violating these protocols. (DEA.gov, n.d.) The Obama administration set up the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) that was focused in ensuring that adequate funding was allocated to individuals suffering with mental illness as they believed it was a caused and effect related diagnosis between individuals suffering with mental disorders and opioid addiction. This organization offered programs that were instrumental in addressing underlining issues in opioid addiction, encouraged preventative strategies that would help reduce opioid related deaths and complications. Finally, there were support groups that were made accessible to chronic opioid users and addicts which would provide comprehensive treatment and rehabilitative services as well extra funding for recovery program expansion. (SAMHSA.gov, 2019). The Bush administration did not completely recognize the effect of opioid crisis and didn\u2019t shed much light on the damage it caused on the overall health and well-being of local communities. It did not address the. Impact it had negatively on developing the economy as well as safety in individuals as drug related crimes were on the rise.<\/p>\n
There more preliminary efforts at prevention of opioid addiction rather than treatment and support of addicts. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(SAMHSA) under the Obama administration would have been quite effective in ensuring that opioid dependency rates were more controlled, as they facilitate programs and support initiatives that advocate for drug-free policies, ensure that there are tighter security protocols in place to limit illegal distribution and trafficking of opioids (SAMHSA.gov, 2019). How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there? As soon as there is a public health issue that has been identified, the next step would be to develop a comprehensive proposal, conducting research on problem solving measures and solutions on the issue. A Public health care representative would be presented with the issue and data that has been collected. The next step would for the proposed health care bill passed to the house of senate for a thorough review in preparation for votes The final step is to motion bill to the desk of the President for it to be executed or prevent the bill from being approved into law. The office of the president has the authority to veto a bill, which can be overthrown by 2\/3 of the votes casted by members of the Senate and House of Representative.<\/p>\n
At this point the Presidential sanction is not required for such bill to essentially be passed into law. (House.gov, n.d.) When a Public health care issue is determined, proposed strategies of problem-solving methods that are specific to the problem are presented for analysis to a Public representative. Following this step is for the bill to be transferred to the House if Senate where it would be reviewed for votes to be cast. And upon Senate approval the bill is sent to the President for it to be enacted into law or otherwise vetoed by members of congress (House.gov, n.d.) The first step of a proposed Public health bill is identification of the Public health issue to a public representative. The senate is then able to review the proposal for it to be signed. And lastly the Perceived the bill for it to be passed into law pending approval. If there is no approval made then it is at this time vetoed (House.gov, n.d.) Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? Members of Community individuals within the same constituencies that have common ideas and values in approaches that foster problem solving strategies whose primary goal world be beneficial to the society at large. Individuals that have similar ideologies and views on current healthcare concerns within a given community or constituency, and their approach on measures set in place to solve these concerning health care issues for better outcomes overall. A group of people that are connected together by the common beliefs, objectives and morals principles on topics and matters in public health care and how effectively they could be resolved. Note: Part 3: of the Module 1: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief is a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief the you will create in a separate document.<\/p>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief References<\/h2>\n
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid Overdose (nd). Retrieved on September 13, 2020 from https:\/\/www.cdc.gov<\/a> Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Retrieved September 13, 2020, from http:\/\/www.cms.gov\/Medicare\/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment\/AcuteInpatientPPS\/dsh.html<\/a>. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations; Proposed Rules. 76. Fed. Reg. 2011 Nov 2;67 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. About Us. (2019). Retrieved on September 13, 2020 from https:\/\/www.samhsa.gov\/about-us<\/a> The White House, (nd), 2019, President Donald J. Trump’s Initiative to Stop Opioid Abuse and Reduce Drug Supply and Demand. Retrieved on September 13 2020 from https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefings-statements\/president-donald-j-trumps-initiative-stop-opioid-abuse-reduce-drug- supply-demand-2\/ The White House, (2017 \u2013 Revised 2019), Control Budget Funding Highlights, https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/ondcp\/policy-and-research\/2016_ndcs_final_report.pdf<\/a> USA.gov. (2020b). Fact Sheet: Obama Administration Takes Action to Reduce Prescription Drug Shortages in the U.S. whitehouse.gov. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/the-press-office\/2011\/10\/31\/fact-sheet-obama-administration-takes-action-reduce-prescription-drug-sh<\/a>.<\/p>\nAssignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Rubric Detail<\/h3>\n
-Identify a population health concern<\/p>\n
-Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nThe response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nThe response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
\nThe response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
\nIdentification and description of a population health concern is missing or incomplete.
\nPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
– Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.<\/p>\n
– Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.<\/p>\n
– Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
\nThe response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least 3 resources are used.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
\nThe response vaguely describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 2 resources are used.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
\nThe response inaccurately describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 1 resource is used.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
\nThe description of the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue is missing. No resources are used.
\nPart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
-Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?<\/p>\n
-How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?<\/p>\n
-Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?<\/p>\n
Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
\n-The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
\n-Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
\n– The response clearly and accurately identifies the entrepreneur\/champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
\n-The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency which may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
\n-Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
\n-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected health care issue is inaccurate.
\n-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
\n-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.
\n-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
\nNarrative:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy-maker\/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
-Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.<\/p>\n
-Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues
\nPoints Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
\nCreates a well-developed, accurate, and narrative.<\/p>\n
The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.<\/p>\n
Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
\nCreates an accurate and thorough narrative.<\/p>\n
The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.<\/p>\n
Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
\nCreates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.<\/p>\n
The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.<\/p>\n
The responses partially justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)<\/p>\n
The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.<\/p>\n
Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/p>\n
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<\/p>\n
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<\/p>\n
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.<\/p>\n
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation<\/p>\n
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
\nContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list.
\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nUses correct APA format with no errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
\nContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
\nContains several (3-4) APA format errors.<\/p>\n
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
\nTotal Points: 100
\nName: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric<\/p>\n
Setting the Agenda Program Transcript<\/h3>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: How do you get a policymaker’s attention? It’s very simple. You develop a relationship with that person. Don’t wait until you need something. Develop the relationship early on.<\/p>\n
[MUSIC PLAYING]<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: Sometimes it’s difficult to get issues on the agenda that are our issues, that might be an issue that’s of interest to a nurse, if it doesn’t align with the interests and the priorities of that elected official. So it’s really important to know what their priorities are, what their health issues are that they’re most interested in. You can usually Google their name. You can get their official bios. You can read about the committees that they serve on and the issues that matter to them. And look to see whether or not their agenda matches with yours, or if there’s a way you can leverage your issue into their agenda.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: Know exactly what the congressional members have on their agenda. And you can get them online, through their local office, or through their congressional office in Washington, DC. Find out what they’re interested in. Find out how you can help them. You need to call them up, or you need to go visit the office and find out exactly what is being done.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: Call up a state senator and say, I am so-and-so. I would like to meet with you. I’m a registered nurse. And I think I may have something that you might be interested to talk about.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: Do the homework you need to do to get up to speed, not just on the issue and a potential solution you may be advocating, but also their background so that you can calibrate your conversation with them in ways that will resonate for them, that they’ll understand and appreciate.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: It’s often helpful to have what is known as a policy entrepreneur. That’s a big word that simply says, do you have anybody who’s on your side or who’s really interested or who can continue to work with your policymaker when you’re out doing your own practice. It could be a retired legislator. It could be a current legislator, someone who’s willing to support a bill and then could perhaps introduce your bill, because only legislators can introduce bills. The president cannot, the governor cannot. That’s the purview of the General Assembly or the Congress.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: People want to hear from their constituents. Ideally, you are communicating with the people who represent you. So that’s almost always the first place to start, your elected official, not the one two states over. That might be appealing, because you know their name from national news. And you certainly<\/p>\n
can communicate to them. But the voices that often matter the most, I’ve found, are the voices from local communities back home in the district or the state that that Senator or Congressman or state legislator represents.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: You have to make sure that you are in it for the long run. These kinds of political processes and policy issues may take years. So you say, oh, my gosh, are you on this forever. Sometimes it seems like it. It may take one session of two years. It may take two. It may take five sessions. But if it’s important enough to you, you need to go.<\/p>\n
FEMALE SPEAKER: This particular meeting with the president was my coming over to the White House, because he’d asked me to meet with him. And he started by saying, Mary, I want to thank you for. And I did what people probably never should do and that my mother would have been very unhappy about my having done, I interrupted the President of the United States. And I did that because I thought I had something more important as a nurse to tell him than he had to tell me.<\/p>\n
So I had hijacked that meeting with him. And given that feedback, very quickly went through those programs that I thought were important for him to hear about, told him the impact, speaking as quickly as I am right now to convey that message. There is information that nurses are uniquely positioned, because of our expertise and our practice, to inform the work of policymakers. And you don’t ever want to lose that opportunity to do just that, even when you’re talking to the President of the United States.<\/p>\n
[MUSIC PLAYING]<\/p>\n
Setting the Agenda<\/h3>\nAdditional Content Attribution<\/strong><\/h4>\nTrowell\u2010Harris, I. (n.d.). Various Photographs [Photograph]. Used with permission of Irene Trowell-Harris.<\/p>\n
Wakefield, M. (n.d.). [Photograph]. Used with permission og Mary Wakefield WAL_NURS6050_NIH-SenatorDanielInouye<\/p>\n
Official White House Photo by Pete Souza<\/p>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\nVery good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\nAcceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\nInadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\nDeficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nFailing level<\/strong><\/p>\nof performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n<\/td>\n \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\n- Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Meet the Experts: Pioneers in Policy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Policy Process [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/strong><\/p>\n Due By It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor\u2019s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and\/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Review the agenda priorities of the\u202fcurrent\/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator\/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current\/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse\u2019s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\n Chapter 1, \u201cInforming Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses\u201d (pp. 11\u201313 only) DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219\u2013224. doi:10.1016\/j.outlook.2014.04.002<\/p>\n Kingdon, J.W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting with applications. Law Review M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331)<\/p>\n Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., \u2026 Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521\u2013530. doi:10.1016\/j.outlook.2015.06.003.<\/p>\n O\u2019Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135\u2013148. doi:10.1177\/1527154417728514<\/p>\n Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n USA.gov. (n.d.). A-Z index of U.S. government departments and agencies. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.usa.gov\/federal-agencies\/a<\/a><\/p>\n USA.gov. (n.d.). Executive departments. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.usa.gov\/executive-departments<\/a><\/p>\n The White House. (n.d.). The cabinet. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the-trump-administration\/the-cabinet\/<\/a><\/p>\n Document: Agenda Comparison Grid Template (Word document)<\/p>\n Required Media<\/p>\n Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Setting the Agenda [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.<\/p>\n Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen has a stake in healthcare policy decisions. Hence, it is little wonder why healthcare items become such high-profile components of presidential agendas. It is also little wonder why they become such hotly debated agenda items.<\/p>\n Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?<\/p>\n Review the Resources and reflect on the importance of agenda setting. Post your response to the discussion question: Consider a topic that rises to the presidential level. How did each of the presidents (Trump, Obama, and Bush) handle the problem? What would you do differently?<\/p>\n I worked as a nurse in trauma ICU for ten years and spent the last two years in the emergency room. I have also worked as a critical care transport nurse for the last four years. Psych has always been something that has intrigued me. I just find it so fascinating and frustrating all at the same time. I am really excited to be a part of the mental health community because it is really something close to my heart. I am so glad that people are more open to talk about their mental health struggles so that other people can support them and also take comfort in knowing they are not alone in their situation.<\/p>\n I have recently been asked to train to be a house supervisor at the hospital I work in. And I was also thinking about transferring to the psych department to get more experience of the process. I like to gain as much training as I can so that I can be a well-rounded nurse.<\/p>\n I have struggled with going back to school because I have three small children and I work a lot so I never really thought I\u2019d have the time for it. Now I have decided that I need to make it a priority for me to do the best for myself to provide for my family.<\/p>\n \u201cProfessional organizations typically establish a mission statement that outlines why they exist and where they are headed. \u201c (Echevarria, 2018) .\u00a0\u00a0These are important qualities to consider when choosing a professional organization that aligns with your values. \u201cProfessional organizations provide nurses with a network of experts to share clinical and administrative challenges and gain new ideas and knowledge.\u201d (Cherry, Caramanica, Everett, Fennimore, & Elaine, 2019) .<\/p>\n Echevarria, I. M. (2018). Make connections by joining a professional nursing organization. Nursing, 48(12), 35-38.<\/p>\n Cherry, B., Caramanica, L, Everett, L. Q., Fennimore, L., & Elaine, S. (2019). Leveraging the power of board leadership in professional nursing organizations.\u00a0JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49<\/em>(11), 517-519.<\/p>\n By Day 6 of Week 1<\/p>\n Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their response and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.<\/p>\n *Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/p>\n Week 1 Discussion Rubric<\/p>\n Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1<\/p>\n It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.<\/p>\n Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor\u2019s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and\/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.<\/p>\n In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.<\/p>\n Review the agenda priorities of the current\/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations. The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page Fact Sheet)<\/p>\n Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current\/sitting U.S. president and the two previous presidential administrations and their agendas related to the public health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:<\/p>\n Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policymaker\/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:<\/p>\n Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief. Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cWK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name. Week 2 Assignment Rubric<\/p>\n Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity<\/p>\n To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:<\/p>\n Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.<\/p>\n Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 2<\/p>\n To submit your Assignment:<\/p>\n Week 2 Assignment<\/p>\n Next Module<\/p>\n Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health\/healthcare issue your selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas. You will use the information in the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid to complete the remaining Part 2 and Part 3 of your Assignment. Identify the Population Health concern you selected. As a professional nurse specializing in substance abuse dependency, I have decided to focus primarily on the population that suffer from Opioid addiction and dependency. Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. The National Institute on Drug Abuse suggests that more than 130 people in the Unites States die from opioid overdose.<\/p>\n Based on these findings we are able to ascertain that this issue is no respecter of persons as it cuts across all races, socio-economic status\/class, gender and creed. The economic burden is over $78 billion a year due to treatment, healthcare, costs due to criminal involvement and addiction treatment. (NIH, 2019). According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the crisis began to emerge in the 1990\u2019s. This began with over prescribing, which led to abuse and addiction. This has resulted in the current opioid crisis. (CDC, 2018) Administration (President Name) (Current President) President Trump (Previous President) President Obama (Previous President) President Bush Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. Under the Trump administrations\u2019 agenda, the agenda focus is currently sterner on opioid abusers and are well equipped with better and more advanced measures on fishing out culprits engaged in these acts. There are more strategic checks and balances that have been put in place under the current administration to limit the influx of illegal drug trafficking into the country.<\/p>\n There are also very tight security protocols and measures on the boarders of the country which is aimed at reducing the number of people affected with opioid abuse and dependency. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Obama administrations\u2019 agenda one of the primary focus was to develop special treatment protocols for individuals suffering from opioid abuse and dependency issues and on creating incentives to ensure that there are more thorough measures in place for regulating opioid prescription by medical practitioners and dispensing means from pharmacies. Monitoring of opioid use and events located at neighborhood law enforcement stations for the return of excess drugs that have been supplied illegally within the system. Community drug dispensaries are accepting of these kinds of take back drives to support drug rehabilitation in chronic abusers addicted to drugs. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Bush administrations\u2019 agenda focused on the prevention of the crises in opioid abuse even before it commenced, the provisions of more drug rehabilitation centers and Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief infiltrating the opioid lack market system. (WhiteHouse.gov) Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue. An estimated $13 million in October 2019 was apportioned to incentives created specifically to fund the police task force in a bid to eradicate the impact of drug trafficking. A total of 12 states across 13 counties that have battled most with the impact that opioid abuse and addiction have impacted. (WhiteHouse.gov)<\/p>\n An outline of the proposals released from the White Trump’s budget will also seek $21 billion to put toward infrastructure spending and $23 billion toward border security, including his infamous border wall. (WhiteHouse.gov) Under the Obama administration, there was a separate budget created for the 2016 fiscal year to the total sum of $27.6 billion with was a 4.7% increment compared to the year before (2017). These funds were generated to develop resources and manpower from the federal level under this administration to tackle drug trafficking in the country. Proactive measures were implemented to combat the tragic impact of the prevalent opioid crisis via The National Heroin Initiative (NHI) by focusing primarily on areas within the community that are opioid-laden. They targeted the center of the illegal opioid supply with more advanced investigative approaches by law enforcement agencies which was a huge preventative method. During The Bush era in administration, his regime, in 2003 there was an estimated total allocation of $19.2 billion raised to fund law enforcement efforts in the battle against opioid trafficking and all other criminal activities associated with drug abuse. Border patrol was also one of the primary areas that this administration focused on to reduce the supply of illegal opioids on an international scale. An allocation of $2.3 billion was set aside for this purpose and an estimated $3.8 billion was allocated to rehabilitation treatments for individuals in our society that have struggled with opioid dependency. In conclusion this administration allocated another $10 million in fostering initiatives for a program that supported the people that were most affected by opioid addiction which was The Drug-Free Communities Support Program. (WhiteHouse.gov) Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\n The Trump Administration took on the approach of spreading awareness and education the teens and adolescents in our society by partnering The Truth Initiative and Ad Council, which was a campaign initiated to teach them on how to prevent and reduce opioid abuse and addiction. It was very comprehensive in helping young adults understand the dangers associated with addiction as well as how effective they could be in curbing the spread of this problem in various communities. This ad was designed to get the attention of the younger population in the society as it successfully has over 1.4 billion views in total when it aired. This administration declared the current opioid addiction issue a nationwide public health emergency, which has brought so much more attention to this crisis. This prompted and inspired people to become more active in the fight against opioid abuse and dependency. More intense measures were taken at the boarders to intensify the patrol and security measures to avoid smuggling drugs illegally into the country. There have also been measures taken to ensure that opioid prescriptions ate regulated thoroughly, by introducing a Safer Prescribing Plan that will reduce any opioid refill prescription by 1\/3 in the next 3 years. Finally, the administration is that will cut opioid prescription fills by one-third within three years.<\/p>\n Finally, the administration has been a strong proponent for vaccines that prevent opioid addiction. (WhiteHouse.gov) The Obama administration offered health care coverage plans that were mandatory for individuals battling with opioid abuse and addiction. This was able to facilitate their treatment regimen and made provision for naloxone, a drug of choice administered to patients that have been suspected of high levels of Opioid-Induced complications. This administration also strengthens efforts at combating drug trafficking which drastically reduces opioid overdoses and deaths. The White House National Drug Control Strategy devised a strategic plan based on evidence-based practices that aims at controlling opioid addiction and substance abuse. The primary goal of this approach was focused on public health, by creating programs that encourage the safe and proper use of opioids and comprehensive treatment plan for this suffering from opioid dependency. Finally, the administration encouraged clinicians and their stakeholders to collaborate effectively in the implementation of more structured protocols while prescribing opioid to the right patients. (WhiteHouse.gov) The primary objective of the Bush administration\u2019s focus on the issue of opioid addiction was to get the individuals suffering focused on getting people into treatment.<\/p>\n This was a focus on \u201ccompassionate Coercion\u201d which begins with family and friends. The focus was on prevention and seeking help for the addict along with using the criminal justice system as a deterrent for getting people into programs. The administration focused on confrontation to heal the addict. Guidance was sought from family, friends, the workplace and places of worship. (WhiteHouse.gov) Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis Using the information, you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health\/healthcare issue your selected Administration (President Name) (Current President) (Previous President) (Previous President) Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? The Trump administration has made collaborative efforts in cross boarder internationally to establish more through security measures in partnerships with law enforcements that have proved to be effective in treating and preventing opioid abuse and addiction. There are specialized training sessions on a regular basis offered by federal agencies to assist clinicals in treatment of patients with opioid addiction, ensure that the stand of practice in treating these patients met the national guidelines requirements, and encourage long term rehabilitation. There are also measures set in place to inspect drug rehabilitation programs in an effort to improve the. Quality of care provided and patient satisfaction<\/p>\n This has led to a drastic reduction of cases involved in drug related offences and criminal activities. The United States Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) plays an important role in regulating the dispensing, regulation and control of opioids and narcotics among users. There are very harsh and severe penalties for individuals that are caught violating these protocols. (DEA.gov, n.d.) The Obama administration set up the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) that was focused in ensuring that adequate funding was allocated to individuals suffering with mental illness as they believed it was a caused and effect related diagnosis between individuals suffering with mental disorders and opioid addiction. This organization offered programs that were instrumental in addressing underlining issues in opioid addiction, encouraged preventative strategies that would help reduce opioid related deaths and complications. Finally, there were support groups that were made accessible to chronic opioid users and addicts which would provide comprehensive treatment and rehabilitative services as well extra funding for recovery program expansion. (SAMHSA.gov, 2019). The Bush administration did not completely recognize the effect of opioid crisis and didn\u2019t shed much light on the damage it caused on the overall health and well-being of local communities. It did not address the. Impact it had negatively on developing the economy as well as safety in individuals as drug related crimes were on the rise.<\/p>\n There more preliminary efforts at prevention of opioid addiction rather than treatment and support of addicts. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(SAMHSA) under the Obama administration would have been quite effective in ensuring that opioid dependency rates were more controlled, as they facilitate programs and support initiatives that advocate for drug-free policies, ensure that there are tighter security protocols in place to limit illegal distribution and trafficking of opioids (SAMHSA.gov, 2019). How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there? As soon as there is a public health issue that has been identified, the next step would be to develop a comprehensive proposal, conducting research on problem solving measures and solutions on the issue. A Public health care representative would be presented with the issue and data that has been collected. The next step would for the proposed health care bill passed to the house of senate for a thorough review in preparation for votes The final step is to motion bill to the desk of the President for it to be executed or prevent the bill from being approved into law. The office of the president has the authority to veto a bill, which can be overthrown by 2\/3 of the votes casted by members of the Senate and House of Representative.<\/p>\n At this point the Presidential sanction is not required for such bill to essentially be passed into law. (House.gov, n.d.) When a Public health care issue is determined, proposed strategies of problem-solving methods that are specific to the problem are presented for analysis to a Public representative. Following this step is for the bill to be transferred to the House if Senate where it would be reviewed for votes to be cast. And upon Senate approval the bill is sent to the President for it to be enacted into law or otherwise vetoed by members of congress (House.gov, n.d.) The first step of a proposed Public health bill is identification of the Public health issue to a public representative. The senate is then able to review the proposal for it to be signed. And lastly the Perceived the bill for it to be passed into law pending approval. If there is no approval made then it is at this time vetoed (House.gov, n.d.) Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents? Members of Community individuals within the same constituencies that have common ideas and values in approaches that foster problem solving strategies whose primary goal world be beneficial to the society at large. Individuals that have similar ideologies and views on current healthcare concerns within a given community or constituency, and their approach on measures set in place to solve these concerning health care issues for better outcomes overall. A group of people that are connected together by the common beliefs, objectives and morals principles on topics and matters in public health care and how effectively they could be resolved. Note: Part 3: of the Module 1: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief is a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief the you will create in a separate document.<\/p>\n Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Opioid Overdose (nd). Retrieved on September 13, 2020 from https:\/\/www.cdc.gov<\/a> Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Retrieved September 13, 2020, from http:\/\/www.cms.gov\/Medicare\/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment\/AcuteInpatientPPS\/dsh.html<\/a>. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations; Proposed Rules. 76. Fed. Reg. 2011 Nov 2;67 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. About Us. (2019). Retrieved on September 13, 2020 from https:\/\/www.samhsa.gov\/about-us<\/a> The White House, (nd), 2019, President Donald J. Trump’s Initiative to Stop Opioid Abuse and Reduce Drug Supply and Demand. Retrieved on September 13 2020 from https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefings-statements\/president-donald-j-trumps-initiative-stop-opioid-abuse-reduce-drug- supply-demand-2\/ The White House, (2017 \u2013 Revised 2019), Control Budget Funding Highlights, https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/ondcp\/policy-and-research\/2016_ndcs_final_report.pdf<\/a> USA.gov. (2020b). Fact Sheet: Obama Administration Takes Action to Reduce Prescription Drug Shortages in the U.S. whitehouse.gov. Retrieved September 13, 2020, from https:\/\/obamawhitehouse.archives.gov\/the-press-office\/2011\/10\/31\/fact-sheet-obama-administration-takes-action-reduce-prescription-drug-sh<\/a>.<\/p>\n -Identify a population health concern<\/p>\n -Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.<\/p>\n Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) <\/p>\n – Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.<\/p>\n – Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.<\/p>\n – Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\n Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) <\/p>\n -Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?<\/p>\n -How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?<\/p>\n -Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?<\/p>\n Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) <\/p>\n Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy-maker\/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/p>\n <\/p>\n -Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.<\/p>\n -Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.<\/p>\n Responses accurately and thoroughly justify in detail the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that may support the summary provided.<\/p>\n Responses accurately justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response provides a vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.<\/p>\n The responses partially justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)<\/p>\n The response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.<\/p>\n Responses justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or is missing. <\/p>\n Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.<\/p>\n Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<\/p>\n Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<\/p>\n Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<\/p>\n Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. <\/p>\n Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation<\/p>\n Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) FEMALE SPEAKER: How do you get a policymaker’s attention? It’s very simple. You develop a relationship with that person. Don’t wait until you need something. Develop the relationship early on.<\/p>\n [MUSIC PLAYING]<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: Sometimes it’s difficult to get issues on the agenda that are our issues, that might be an issue that’s of interest to a nurse, if it doesn’t align with the interests and the priorities of that elected official. So it’s really important to know what their priorities are, what their health issues are that they’re most interested in. You can usually Google their name. You can get their official bios. You can read about the committees that they serve on and the issues that matter to them. And look to see whether or not their agenda matches with yours, or if there’s a way you can leverage your issue into their agenda.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: Know exactly what the congressional members have on their agenda. And you can get them online, through their local office, or through their congressional office in Washington, DC. Find out what they’re interested in. Find out how you can help them. You need to call them up, or you need to go visit the office and find out exactly what is being done.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: Call up a state senator and say, I am so-and-so. I would like to meet with you. I’m a registered nurse. And I think I may have something that you might be interested to talk about.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: Do the homework you need to do to get up to speed, not just on the issue and a potential solution you may be advocating, but also their background so that you can calibrate your conversation with them in ways that will resonate for them, that they’ll understand and appreciate.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: It’s often helpful to have what is known as a policy entrepreneur. That’s a big word that simply says, do you have anybody who’s on your side or who’s really interested or who can continue to work with your policymaker when you’re out doing your own practice. It could be a retired legislator. It could be a current legislator, someone who’s willing to support a bill and then could perhaps introduce your bill, because only legislators can introduce bills. The president cannot, the governor cannot. That’s the purview of the General Assembly or the Congress.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: People want to hear from their constituents. Ideally, you are communicating with the people who represent you. So that’s almost always the first place to start, your elected official, not the one two states over. That might be appealing, because you know their name from national news. And you certainly<\/p>\n can communicate to them. But the voices that often matter the most, I’ve found, are the voices from local communities back home in the district or the state that that Senator or Congressman or state legislator represents.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: You have to make sure that you are in it for the long run. These kinds of political processes and policy issues may take years. So you say, oh, my gosh, are you on this forever. Sometimes it seems like it. It may take one session of two years. It may take two. It may take five sessions. But if it’s important enough to you, you need to go.<\/p>\n FEMALE SPEAKER: This particular meeting with the president was my coming over to the White House, because he’d asked me to meet with him. And he started by saying, Mary, I want to thank you for. And I did what people probably never should do and that my mother would have been very unhappy about my having done, I interrupted the President of the United States. And I did that because I thought I had something more important as a nurse to tell him than he had to tell me.<\/p>\n So I had hijacked that meeting with him. And given that feedback, very quickly went through those programs that I thought were important for him to hear about, told him the impact, speaking as quickly as I am right now to convey that message. There is information that nurses are uniquely positioned, because of our expertise and our practice, to inform the work of policymakers. And you don’t ever want to lose that opportunity to do just that, even when you’re talking to the President of the United States.<\/p>\n [MUSIC PLAYING]<\/p>\n Trowell\u2010Harris, I. (n.d.). Various Photographs [Photograph]. Used with permission of Irene Trowell-Harris.<\/p>\n Wakefield, M. (n.d.). [Photograph]. Used with permission og Mary Wakefield WAL_NURS6050_NIH-SenatorDanielInouye<\/p>\n Official White House Photo by Pete Souza<\/p>\n 100%<\/strong><\/p>\n 16 points<\/strong><\/td>\n 88%<\/strong><\/p>\n 14 points<\/strong><\/td>\n 81%<\/strong><\/p>\n 13 points<\/strong><\/td>\n 68%<\/strong><\/p>\n 11 points<\/strong><\/td>\n 56%<\/strong><\/p>\n 9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n 55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n 0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nLearning Objectives<\/strong>
\nStudents will:<\/strong><\/h3>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief <\/a><\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/a>
\nAssignment
\nWeek 1, Days 1\u20132
\nRead\/Watch\/Listen to the Learning Resources.
\nCompose your initial Discussion post.
\nWeek 1, Day 3
\nPost your initial discussion post.
\nWeek 1, Days 4-5
\nReview peer Discussion posts.
\nCompose your peer Discussion responses.
\nBegin to compose your Assignment.
\nWeek 1, Day 6
\nPost at least two peer Discussion responses on two different days (and not the same day as the initial post).
\nContinue to compose your final draft of your Assignment.
\nWeek 1, Day 7
\nWrap up Discussion.
\nWeek 2, Day 1\u20136
\nContinue to compose your Assignment.
\nWeek 2, Day 7
\nDeadline to submit your Assignment.<\/p>\nLearning Resources<\/h2>\n
Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n
To Prepare:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Required Readings<\/h2>\n
\nChapter 2, \u201cAgenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker\u2019s Attention?\u201d (pp. 17\u201336)
\nChapter 10, \u201cOverview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care\u201d (pp. 171\u2013180)
\nChapter 12, \u201cAn Insider\u2019s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities\u201d
\n\u201cCreating a Fact Sheet\u201d (pp. 217-221)<\/p>\nTo Prepare:<\/h2>\n
\nConsider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare<\/a> issues become agenda priorities.<\/p>\nBy Day 3 of Week 1<\/h2>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Submission and Grading Information
\nGrading Criteria<\/h3>\nTo access your rubric:<\/h4>\n
To participate in this Discussion:<\/h3>\n
Week 1 Discussion<\/h4>\n
Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/h3>\n
To Prepare:<\/h3>\n
\nSelect an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by each of the last three U.S. presidential administrations.
\nReflect on the focus of their respective agendas, including the allocation of financial resources for addressing the healthcare issue you selected.
\nConsider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator\/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.<\/p>\nPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid<\/h3>\n
\nDescribe the administrative agenda focus related to the issue you selected.
\nIdentify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.
\nExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.<\/p>\nPart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis<\/h3>\n
\nHow do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?
\nWho would you choose to be the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?<\/p>\nPart 3: Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/h3>\n
\nJustify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.<\/p>\nBy Day 7 of Week 2<\/h3>\n
\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/p>\nTo submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/h3>\n
\nClick the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
\nClick the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.
\nNext, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as \u201cWK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click Open.
\nIf applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
\nClick on the Submit button to complete your submission.<\/p>\nAssignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Grading Criteria<\/h3>\n
To access your rubric:<\/h4>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Agenda Comparison Grid Template Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2<\/h3>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief References<\/h2>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Rubric Detail<\/h3>\n
\nThe response clearly and accurately identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
\nThe response vaguely identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
\nThe response inaccurately identifies and describes a population health concern.<\/p>\n
\nIdentification and description of a population health concern is missing or incomplete.
\nPart 1: Agenda Comparison Grid-<\/p>\n
\nThe response clearly and accurately describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. At least 3 resources are used.<\/p>\n
\nThe response vaguely describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explains how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 2 resources are used.<\/p>\n
\nThe response inaccurately describes the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, the financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. Only 1 resource is used.<\/p>\n
\nThe description of the presidential administrations\u2019 focus related to the concern, financial and resource allocation dedicated to the concern, and explanation for how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue is missing. No resources are used.
\nPart 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:<\/p>\n
\n-The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
\n-Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
\n– The response clearly and accurately identifies the entrepreneur\/champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.<\/p>\n
\n-The response vaguely identifies an administrative agency which may be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue.
\n-Response adequately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague.<\/p>\n
\n-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected health care issue is inaccurate.
\n-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.<\/p>\n
\n-Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.
\n-Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
\n-Identification of the entrepreneur\/ champion\/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is vague and inaccurate or is missing.
\nNarrative:<\/p>\n
\nPoints Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
\nCreates a well-developed, accurate, and narrative.<\/p>\n
\nCreates an accurate and thorough narrative.<\/p>\n
\nCreates a narrative that is partially accurate or incomplete.<\/p>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:<\/p>\n
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/p>\n
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<\/p>\n
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.<\/p>\n
\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.<\/p>\n
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:<\/p>\n
\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.
\nWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list.
\nPoints Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
\nUses correct APA format with no errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains several (3-4) APA format errors.<\/p>\n
\nContains many (\u2265 5) APA format errors.
\nTotal Points: 100
\nName: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric<\/p>\nSetting the Agenda Program Transcript<\/h3>\n
Setting the Agenda<\/h3>\n
Additional Content Attribution<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Assignment Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n Performance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n 100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n Very good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n Acceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n Inadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n Deficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n Failing level<\/strong><\/p>\n \n \u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n 13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
<\/p>\n \n
<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n \n
\n <\/td>\n \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Application of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n \n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n \n
\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n 9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n \u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n