wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Introduction: \u2022 This lab is designed to help you become familiar with scientific names and the classification scheme biologists use to understand organisms. This branch of biology that deals with classifying and naming organisms is called taxonomy. \u2022 The modern system of classification began in 1758 when a Swedish doctor\/botanist introduced the binomial system of nomenclature (based upon two names). Carl von Linne, better known in the style of his own naming system as Carolus Linnaeus, published his concept of binomial nomenclature in the tenth edition of his book, Systema Naturae. This system used two Latin names\u2014genus and species\u2014 for each species of organism. Binomial names are either italicized or underlined. The first letter of the Genus name is capitalized, but the species is always writing in lowercase (ie. Genus species or Genus species). After the genus name has been written out once, it may be abbreviated in writing as G. species of G. Species. \u2022 In addition to assigning a unique name to each species, Linnaeus recognized a need for placing organisms into groups based on their similarities. These similarities were first based solely on the appearances and behaviors of organisms; now, however, they are also based on genetic similarities by using DNA. As a result, some species were reclassified. The classification originally divided all life forms into two major kingdoms. (Animalia and Plantae). Recently, though, biologists have added a new category above the kingdom, known as domain, and have expanded the kingdoms to six (Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Bacteria, and Archaea). The three domains are Eubacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. The domain classifications are based on the type of cells that make up the organism. Prokaryotic cells are those that have no nucleus or membrane-bound organelles. Eukaryotic cells, on the other hand, do have a nucleus and membrane-bound organelles. \u2022 Kingdoms are divided into smaller groups called phyla (singular, phylum). A phylum is divided into classes; classes into orders; orders into families; families into genera (singular, genus); and a genus is divided into species. Therefore, all organisms can be described in terms of their hierarchical taxonomic classification scheme: To help you remember this sequence, remember this mnemonic device: Dear King Phillip came over for good spaghetti Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Prelab. Exploring Taxonomy 1. Some resources name name the father of binomial nomenclature as Carolus Linaeus and other resources report the name Carl von Linne\u2019. Why are there 2 different names? 2 points 2. Research another individual linked to taxonomy (google early taxonomists). What characteristics did this scientist use to classify organisms? 3.What is your favorite animal? Give its common name and scientific name __________________________________________________________________________________________ What is your favorite plant (flower, cactus, tree\u2026) Give its common name and scientific name 4. I am sure that all of you have read about a family who \u201cbuys\/adopts\u201d a dog from a pet store, thinking it was a Tibetan Mastiff. After a short period of time, they notice strange behaviors, like eating no meat and walking on its hind legs. I\u2019m sure you guessed it- a, Asiatic Black Bear. What are 2 features that the species have in common? What are 2 physical features that should have been noticed by the family and used to rule out their pet as a dog? 1.__________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.__________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.__________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.__________________________________________________________________________________________ The family called in specialists, who identified the bear and transported it to a wild life sanctuary. (I thought you would want to know ward\u2019s science + Page 3 Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Lab exercise 1 Taxonomic Hierarchy (10 points) Record the scientific names of the following organisms in the table below. Note: All of these organisms are indigenous to Texas! (Use Reliable sources to obtain this information.) Houston toad American bison Attwater Prairie Chicken Bald Eagle Pecan Tree Bluebonnets Armadillo Bobcat Coyote Ocelot One of the important uses of classification (finding out the proper name) is to determine whether an animal or plant needs additional protection due to endangered status. Which of the organism(s) above is endangered? _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Why is\/are they endangered? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ward\u2019s science + Page 4 Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Choose ONE of the previous animals and record its complete classification in the table below. Be sure to record both the common name and its complete taxonomic classification. (Use reliable sources to obtain this information). Common Name Domain Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Would it be easier to identify these and other species is we had a guide book? How about an app? 1. state one app that could help you identify plants __________________________ State one APP that can help you to identify animals _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ ward\u2019s science + Page 5 Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Part 4. Postlab (50 points) name:_____________________________ The Guide on the Side Context: A field guide is a book designed to help the reader identify organisms. It is generally designed to be brought into the \u2018field\u2019 or local area where such organisms exist to help distinguish between them. Field guides are often designed to help users distinguish animals and plants that may be similar in appearance but are not necessarily closely related. Scenario: Each year, the local environmental group publishes an updated field guide of organisms in your immediate area for scout groups and environmental enthusiasts to use while they are exploring local parks and nature preserves. This year, they have approached us, because they know we are studying taxonomy, and thought it would be a great way to get students involved in studying nature. So, you will be creating a field guide of your own to submit for publication. Only the best entries will be selected and receive the honor of being in this year\u2019s guide. Challenge: You will choose any 10 living organisms that you can see and compile a picture collection of these organisms. For each organism, you will highlight some information about it and include its scientific name. Limitations: 1. The organisms cannot come from taxonomy lab pages. 2. The organisms must be living. 3. The photographs must be yours, not something pulled from the internet. Rules: 1. You must use the template provided to submit your work. (online) 2. You must include 10 photographs. 3. The images in the photographs must be clear. 4. You must include the common name and scientific name of each organism. 5. You must indicate the date and location of each picture. 6. Spelling and classification rules apply. ward\u2019s science + Page 6 Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Image Scientific Name (Genus species) Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Page 7 Image Scientific Name (Genus species) Taxonomy Lab (student handout continued) Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Common Name: Scientific Name: Location of Photograph: Date and Time of Photograph: Interesting Notes: Page 8<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n| Excellent<\/strong><\/td>\n | Good<\/strong><\/td>\n | Fair<\/strong><\/td>\n | Poor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n | Main Postinga<\/strong><\/td>\n | 45\u00a0(45%)\u00a0– 50\u00a0(50%)<\/p>\n | Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three current, credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n 40\u00a0(40%)\u00a0– 44\u00a0(44%)<\/p>\n | Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Supported by at least three credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n 35\u00a0(35%)\u00a0– 39\u00a0(39%)<\/p>\n | Responds to some of the discussion question(s).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Post is cited with two credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains some APA formatting errors.<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 34\u00a0(34%)<\/p>\n | Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains only one or no credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Not written clearly or concisely.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Main Post: Timeliness<\/strong><\/td>\n | 10\u00a0(10%)\u00a0– 10\u00a0(10%)<\/p>\n | Posts main post by day 3.<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n | Does not post by day 3.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n First Response<\/strong><\/td>\n | 17\u00a0(17%)\u00a0– 18\u00a0(18%)<\/p>\n | Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n 15\u00a0(15%)\u00a0– 16\u00a0(16%)<\/p>\n | Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n 13\u00a0(13%)\u00a0– 14\u00a0(14%)<\/p>\n | Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 12\u00a0(12%)<\/p>\n | Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Second Response<\/strong><\/td>\n | 16\u00a0(16%)\u00a0– 17\u00a0(17%)<\/p>\n | Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n 14\u00a0(14%)\u00a0– 15\u00a0(15%)<\/p>\n | Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.<\/td>\n 12\u00a0(12%)\u00a0– 13\u00a0(13%)<\/p>\n | Response is on topic and may have some depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 11\u00a0(11%)<\/p>\n | Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Responses to faculty questions are missing.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n No credible sources are cited.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Participation<\/strong><\/td>\n | 5\u00a0(5%)\u00a0– 5\u00a0(5%)<\/p>\n | Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.<\/td>\n 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/td>\n | 0\u00a0(0%)\u00a0– 0\u00a0(0%)<\/p>\n | Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Total Points: 100<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Dallas Baptist Univercity Taxonamy Lab Report Introduction: \u2022 This lab is designed to help you become familiar with scientific names and the classification scheme biologists use to understand organisms. This branch of biology that deals with classifying and naming organisms is called taxonomy. \u2022 The modern system of classification began in 1758 when a Swedish […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":6}},"yoast_head":"\n |