\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n| Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions<\/li>\n
- Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation\/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n
- Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation\/evaluation.<\/li>\n
- The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010<\/strong><\/td>\n9 <\/strong><\/td>\n8 <\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Application of Course Knowledge –<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and\/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;<\/li>\n
- Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.<\/li>\n
- Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n
- Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.<\/li>\n
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n
- Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.<\/li>\n
- Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content<\/li>\n
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored<\/li>\n
- No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPerformance Category <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a05<\/strong><\/td>\n4 <\/strong><\/td>\n3 <\/strong><\/td>\n2<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Interactive Dialogue<\/strong><\/p>\n Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.<\/strong><\/p>\n(5 points possible per graded thread)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Exceeds minimum post requirements<\/li>\n
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.<\/li>\n
- Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer<\/li>\n
- Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days<\/li>\n
- Replies to a question posed by a peer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/td>\n \n\n- Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.<\/li>\n
- The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline<\/li>\n
- Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Has only one post for the week<\/li>\n
- Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Does not post to the thread<\/li>\n
- No connections are made to the topic<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 1 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 2 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 3 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 4 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 5 Point<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Grammar, Syntax, APA<\/strong><\/p>\n Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.<\/strong><\/p>\nPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- 2-3 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 4-5 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is somewhat focused.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 6-7 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 8-10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style does not facilitate communication.<\/li>\n
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n| <\/td>\n | 0 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n-5 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Total Participation Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n per discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n| The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| Early Participation Requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n per discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n| The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 590 Discussion: Select a statistical test for the EBP proposal<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NUR 590 Discussion: Select a statistical test for the EBP proposal<\/strong><\/h2>\nIn every research project, there are anticipated benefits and risks that could be experienced in its progress. Similarly, some activities in research are considerably risky to the participants, especially the vulnerable groups. As there is need to protect the vulnerable groups. One of the methods to protect personal rights of individuals in the vulnerable group is through the establishment of safety monitoring plans to ensure effective supervision the personal rights of participants to ensure they are secure. Other than ensuring security of participants, safety monitoring plans also ensure integrity, timeliness, and quality at every stage in the project. The other method of protecting rights of vulnerable groups is through compliance with rules implemented by regulatory boards and committees such as ethical review boards. The norms provided by these bodies are intended to safeguard privacy of vulnerable participants, rights, and safety based on the measurements on the risk-benefit scale. Moreover, the methodology used in collection of data should be confidential to protect the privacy of the participants (De Chesnay & Anderson, 2019).\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nRegarding the consideration of patients\u2019 values and nurse\u2019s clinical judgment in applying the evidence in clinical decision making for an individual patient, nurses are encouraged to factor in both EBP and patient-centered care. Sometimes these two paradigms appear mutually exclusive and challenging to reconcile. Both the provider\u2019s perspectives and the patient\u2019s values and preferences need to be weighed equally in the decision making process. Essentially, the EBP can become patient centered by considering and integrating patient\u2019s perspectives and values into clinical trials designs and by enabling patients with strong preferences to be engaged in their treatment plan (Scheunemann et al.<\/span>,<\/span><\/i> 2019). Integrating patient values and preferences into EBP is crucial in strengthening the ability to tailor EBP interventions for the individual patient. It also helps the patients to understand and share their unique values and preferences, which is critical for patient-centered care.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReferences<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nDe Chesnay, M., & Anderson, B. (2019). <\/span>Caring for the vulnerable<\/span><\/i>. Jones & Bartlett Learning.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nScheunemann, L. P., Ernecoff, N. C., Buddadhumaruk, P., Carson, S. S., Hough, C. L., Curtis, J. R.,\u00a0 & White, D. B. (2019). Clinician-family communication about patients\u2019 values and preferences in intensive care units. <\/span>JAMA internal medicine<\/span><\/i> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
![\"NUR](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/NUR-590-Discussion-Select-a-statistical-test-for-the-EBP-proposal.png\")
<\/a>