10.0 %Change Initiative and Being a Change Advocate An outline of how change would be initiated is not included. An outline of how change would be initiated is incomplete or incorrect. An outline of how change would be initiated is included, but lacks supporting detail. An outline of how change would be initiated is completed and includes supporting detail. An outline of how change would be initiated is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n5.0 %Driving Forces of EHRS A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is not included. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/p>\n
5.0 %Key Interprofessional Stakeholders Identification of the key interprofessional stakeholders is not included. Identification of the key interprofessional stakeholders is incomplete or incorrect. Identification of the key interprofessional stakeholders is included, but lacks supporting detail. Identification of the key interprofessional stakeholders is completed and includes supporting detail. Identification of the key interprofessional stakeholders is extremely thorough and includes substantial details<\/p>\n
5.0 %Impact of the Change on Current Workflows A description of how the change will affect current workflows is not included. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/p>\n
5.0 %Required Resources for Implementation Identification of required resources for implementation is not included Identification of required resources for implementation is incomplete or incorrect. Identification of required resources for implementation is included, but lacks supporting detail. Identification of required resources for implementation is completed and includes supporting detail. Identification of required resources for implementation is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n5.0 %Risks Within Implementation A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is not included. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is incomplete or incorrect. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is included but lacks supporting detail. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/p>\n
30.0 %Presentation of Content The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.<\/p>\n
5.0 %Potential Barriers A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is not included. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is incomplete or incorrect. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.<\/p>\n
10.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.<\/p>\n
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/p>\n
100 %Total Weightage<\/p>\n
NUR 514\u00a0 Implementing Change With an Inter-professional Approach Grading Rubric Guidelines<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n| Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions<\/li>\n
- Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation\/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.<\/li>\n
- Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.<\/li>\n
- Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation\/evaluation.<\/li>\n
- The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.<\/li>\n
- Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010<\/strong><\/td>\n9 <\/strong><\/td>\n8 <\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Application of Course Knowledge –<\/strong><\/p>\n Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and\/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;<\/li>\n
- Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.<\/li>\n
- Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n
- Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.<\/li>\n
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n
- Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.<\/li>\n
- Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content<\/li>\n
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored<\/li>\n
- No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPerformance Category <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a05<\/strong><\/td>\n4 <\/strong><\/td>\n3 <\/strong><\/td>\n2<\/strong><\/td>\n0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Interactive Dialogue<\/strong><\/p>\n Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.<\/strong><\/p>\n(5 points possible per graded thread)<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- Exceeds minimum post requirements<\/li>\n
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.<\/li>\n
- Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer<\/li>\n
- Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days<\/li>\n
- Replies to a question posed by a peer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.<\/td>\n \n\n- Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.<\/li>\n
- The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline<\/li>\n
- Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Has only one post for the week<\/li>\n
- Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Does not post to the thread<\/li>\n
- No connections are made to the topic<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 1 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 2 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 3 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 4 Point<\/strong><\/td>\nMinus 5 Point<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Grammar, Syntax, APA<\/strong><\/p>\n Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.<\/strong><\/p>\nPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/td>\n\n\n- 2-3 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 4-5 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is somewhat focused.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 6-7 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- 8-10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n- Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n
- Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.<\/li>\n
- Writing style does not facilitate communication.<\/li>\n
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n| <\/td>\n | 0 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n-5 points lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n| Total Participation Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n per discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n| The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| Early Participation Requirement<\/strong><\/p>\n per discussion thread<\/em><\/strong><\/td>\n| The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 514 Implementing Change With an Inter-professional Approach<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NUR 514 Implementing Change With an Inter-professional Approach<\/strong><\/h2>\nDRIVING FORCES OF EHRS<\/span><\/span>\u200b<\/span><\/p>\n\n- In the current world, Electronic health records (EHRs) are the\u00a0<\/span>center<\/span>\u00a0for healthcare data\u00a0<\/span>collection, storage, and management in several hospitals around the world.<\/span>\u200b<\/li>\n
- The driving forces for the development of EHRs are divided into two main categories:\u00a0<\/span>Compliance and User needs.<\/span>\u200b<\/li>\n
- With compliance, the organization must observe all the legal and insurance requirements\u00a0<\/span>outlined for the development of HER (<\/span>Krousel<\/span>-Wood\u00a0<\/span>et al.,\u00a0<\/span><\/i>2017<\/span>).\u00a0 Afterward, they can\u00a0<\/span>then consider the cost and practice need specifications to be able to adopt the best\u00a0<\/span>system.\u00a0<\/span>\u200b<\/li>\n
- The user needs, on the other hand, to emphasize making sure that the health care\u00a0<\/span>workers\u2019 needs are considered when deciding on which EHR system to adopt.\u00a0<\/span>\u200b<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
![\"NUR](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/NUR-514-Implementing-Change-With-an-Inter-professional-Approach-1-300x129.png\")