\n\nDocumentation of Sources<\/p>\nDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nSources are not documented.<\/td>\n
3.51 points<\/p>\nDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/td>\n
4.05 points<\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/td>\n
4.59 points<\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/td>\n
5.4 points<\/p>\nSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/p>\nMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/td>\n
5.85 points<\/p>\nFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.<\/td>\n
6.75 points<\/p>\nSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/td>\n
7.65 points<\/p>\nProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.<\/td>\n
9 points<\/p>\nWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nAssessment of Overall Organizational Readiness<\/p>\nAssessment of Overall Organizational Readiness<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nAssessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.<\/td>\n
17.55 points<\/p>\nAssessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.<\/td>\n
20.25 points<\/p>\nAssessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.<\/td>\n
22.95 points<\/p>\nAssessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.<\/td>\n
27 points<\/p>\nAssessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTheory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan<\/p>\nTheory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nTheory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.<\/td>\n
17.55 points<\/p>\nTheory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.<\/td>\n
20.25 points<\/p>\nTheory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.<\/td>\n
22.95 points<\/p>\nTheory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.<\/td>\n
27 points<\/p>\nTheory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nArgument Logic and Construction<\/p>\nArgument Logic and Construction<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/td>\n
5.85 points<\/p>\nSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/td>\n
6.75 points<\/p>\nArgument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/td>\n
7.65 points<\/p>\nArgument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/td>\n
9 points<\/p>\nClear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nIdentification of Issues in Organizational Culture<\/p>\nIdentification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nCurrent or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.<\/td>\n
17.55 points<\/p>\nCurrent or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.<\/td>\n
20.25 points<\/p>\nCurrent or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.<\/td>\n
22.95 points<\/p>\nCurrent or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.<\/td>\n
27 points<\/p>\nCurrent or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nThesis Development and Purpose<\/p>\nThesis Development and Purpose<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/td>\n
5.85 points<\/p>\nThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/td>\n
6.75 points<\/p>\nThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/td>\n
7.65 points<\/p>\nThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/td>\n
9 points<\/p>\nThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nHealth Care Organization or Network<\/p>\nHealth Care Organization or Network<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nHealth care organization or network is not described.<\/td>\n
17.55 points<\/p>\nHealth care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.<\/td>\n
20.25 points<\/p>\nHealth care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.<\/td>\n
22.95 points<\/p>\nHealth care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.<\/td>\n
27 points<\/p>\nHealth care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPaper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/p>\nPaper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nTemplate is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/td>\n
2.34 points<\/p>\nAppropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/td>\n
2.7 points<\/p>\nAppropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/td>\n
3.06 points<\/p>\nAppropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/td>\n
3.6 points<\/p>\nAll format elements are correct.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nStrategic Plan<\/p>\nStrategic Plan<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nStrategic plan is omitted.<\/td>\n
23.4 points<\/p>\nStrategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.<\/td>\n
27 points<\/p>\nThe strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.<\/td>\n
30.6 points<\/p>\nThe strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.<\/td>\n
36 points<\/p>\nThe strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation GCU<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nNRS 451 Health Organization Evaluation GCU<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n
Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\nVery good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\nAcceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\nInadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\nDeficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nFailing level<\/strong><\/p>\nof performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n<\/td>\n \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nInteractive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\nInitial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nThe peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nResponses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n Demonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\nPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\nError is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n
\n10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
![\"NRS](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/NRS-451-Health-Organization-Evaluation-GCU-300x144.png\")