\n\nEffect of Identified Problem or Issue<\/p>\nEffect of Identified Problem or Issue<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nEffect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is omitted.<\/td>\n
5.63 points<\/p>\nEffect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented but is largely incomplete.<\/td>\n
5.93 points<\/p>\nEffect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
6.68 points<\/p>\nEffect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
7.5 points<\/p>\nEffect of the identified problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nThesis Development and Purpose<\/p>\nThesis Development and Purpose<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.<\/td>\n
1.88 points<\/p>\nThesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.<\/td>\n
1.98 points<\/p>\nThesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.<\/td>\n
2.23 points<\/p>\nThesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.<\/td>\n
2.5 points<\/p>\nThesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/p>\nMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.<\/td>\n
1.88 points<\/p>\nFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.<\/td>\n
1.98 points<\/p>\nSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.<\/td>\n
2.23 points<\/p>\nProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.<\/td>\n
2.5 points<\/p>\nWriter is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nArgument Logic and Construction<\/p>\nArgument Logic and Construction<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.<\/td>\n
1.88 points<\/p>\nSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.<\/td>\n
1.98 points<\/p>\nArgument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.<\/td>\n
2.23 points<\/p>\nArgument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.<\/td>\n
2.5 points<\/p>\nClear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nDocumentation of Sources<\/p>\nDocumentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nSources are not documented.<\/td>\n
1.13 points<\/p>\nDocumentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.<\/td>\n
1.19 points<\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.<\/td>\n
1.34 points<\/p>\nSources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.<\/td>\n
1.5 points<\/p>\nSources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPeer-Reviewed Articles<\/p>\nPeer-Reviewed Articles<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nFewer than six peer-reviewed articles are presented.<\/td>\n
1.88 points<\/p>\nFewer than seven peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only five articles meet the assignment criteria.<\/td>\n
1.98 points<\/p>\nEight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only six articles meet the assignment criteria.<\/td>\n
2.23 points<\/p>\nEight peer-reviewed articles are presented. Overall, only seven articles meet the assignment criteria.<\/td>\n
2.5 points<\/p>\nEight peer-reviewed articles are presented, and each article clearly meets the assignment criteria.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nTopic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice<\/p>\nTopic Significance and Implications for Nursing Practice<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nSignificance of topic and its implications for nursing practice is omitted.<\/td>\n
5.63 points<\/p>\nTopic is presented but criteria are incomplete.<\/td>\n
5.93 points<\/p>\nTopic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
6.68 points<\/p>\nTopic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
7.5 points<\/p>\nTopic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nDetailed Description of Project Topic<\/p>\nDetailed Description of Project Topic<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nA description of the project topic is omitted.<\/td>\n
5.63 points<\/p>\nA description of the project topic is presented but is largely incomplete.<\/td>\n
5.93 points<\/p>\nA description of the project topic is presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
6.68 points<\/p>\nA description of the project topic is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
7.5 points<\/p>\nA detailed description of the project topic is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nProposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice<\/p>\nProposed Solution for Identified Project Topic and Implications for Nursing Practice<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nA proposed solution to the identified project topic with an explanation of how it will affect nursing practice is omitted.<\/td>\n
5.63 points<\/p>\nTopic is presented but criteria are incomplete.<\/td>\n
5.93 points<\/p>\nTopic and most criteria are presented. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
6.68 points<\/p>\nTopic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
7.5 points<\/p>\nTopic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nSetting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed<\/p>\nSetting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nThe setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is omitted.<\/td>\n
3.75 points<\/p>\nThe setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented but is largely incomplete.<\/td>\n
3.95 points<\/p>\nThe setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
4.45 points<\/p>\nThe setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
5 points<\/p>\nThe setting or context in which the problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project can be observed is logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nPaper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/p>\nPaper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nTemplate is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.<\/td>\n
0.75 points<\/p>\nTemplate is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.<\/td>\n
0.79 points<\/p>\nTemplate is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.<\/td>\n
0.89 points<\/p>\nTemplate is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.<\/td>\n
1 points<\/p>\nAll format elements are correct.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\nProject Topic for Focus of Change Proposal<\/p>\nProject Topic for Focus of Change Proposal<\/td>\n
0 points<\/p>\nThe problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.<\/td>\n
1.88 points<\/p>\nThe problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.<\/td>\n
1.98 points<\/p>\nThe problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.<\/td>\n
2.23 points<\/p>\nThe problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.<\/td>\n
2.5 points<\/p>\nThe problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval GCU<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nNRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval GCU<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nGrading Rubric<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\nVery good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\nAcceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\nInadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\nDeficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nFailing level<\/strong><\/p>\nof performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n<\/td>\n \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nInteractive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\nInitial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nThe peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nResponses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n