Title: NR 505 Week 7: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL<\/strong><\/h2>\nFor the older adults (over 65), being discharged from the Geriatric Enhanced Medicine (GEM) \nunit at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), can the use of the teach-back method with \ndischarge education, compared to not using the teach-back method with discharge education, improve \npatient satisfaction within eight weeks, as measured by the HCAHPS survey questions?<\/p>\n
Key Stakeholders<\/h3>\n The key stakeholders involved include the patients, physicians, patients, nurse practitioners, \ninsurance companies, management of the health facility, and pharmacists. These stakeholders provide<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL 3 \nvaluable resources and necessary support in planning and initiating the proposed teach-back method of \nproviding patient education during patient discharge.<\/p>\n
Theoretical Framework<\/h3>\n This EBP project will be guided by the Dorothea Orem theory of nursing. The theory is divided \ninto three parts namely theory of self care, theory of self care deficit, and theory of nursing system. \nAccording to Orem, self-care connotes practices initiated and performed by a person for personal \nbenefits such as maintaining life, health, and wellness. On the other hand, the theory of self-care deficit \nspecifies when nursing is required. In particular, it states that nursing is needed when an adult is \nincapable of providing continuous good self care. Therefore, Orem advances five nursing helping \ntechniques including guiding others, teaching another, acting for and doing for others, providing a good \nenvironment to foster personal development to realize future demands, and supporting another. Finally, \nthe theory of nursing systems illustrates the manner in which the self care needs of the patients will be \nmet by the nurse, the patient, or both of them. Overall, the major assumptions of this theory are; \n\uf0d8 Individuals should be self-dependent and responsible for own care and the family members who \nneed care. \n\uf0d8 Individuals are distinct \n\uf0d8 Attaining self-care needs is crucial element of primary care and prevention of poor health. \n\uf0d8 An individual\u2019s awareness of possible health challenges is vital in enhancing self-care behaviors. \n\uf0d8 Self-care and autonomous care behaviors are learned within the context of socio-cultural. \nEssentially, the Orem\u2019s theory is applicable in nursing practice as it assists nurses to enhance the \nhealth of patients by making them autonomous. In the present EBP project, providing ways to improve \neffective discharge teaching to enable patients leave the hospital with more confidence and better \nunderstanding of how to manage their health conforms to the provision of theory\u2019s perspective that a \npatient has skills to create actions that meet personal needs of the patient becomes suitable for self care.<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL 4<\/h3>\nLiterature Review<\/h4>\n Over the past decade, the conversion from hospital to home care has been associated with \nincreased risks, especially for older adults with intricate care needs. This risk is associated with many \nfactors including patient\u2019s lack of or poor understanding of discharge instructions. According to Waniga \net al. (2016), the time of discharge from the hospital is extremely vulnerable for patients with nearly \n19% of patients experiencing adverse events of post discharge such as uncertainty, anxiety, and lack of \nunderstanding about discharge instructions. All these lead to readmission rates, and influence the overall \nperception of the hospital experience. Therefore, non-sophisticated discharge instructions are vital to \nensure seamless change from hospital to home, when the care responsibility changes from the providers \nto patients and care givers (Navanandan et al., 2017). Consequently, nurses play a crucial role in \nproviding discharge instructions to patients. \nMoreover, older adults face challenges such as functional capacity, inability for self care, and \ndeteriorated health status. Therefore, before hospital discharge, it is imperative for nurses to provide \ndischarge education that considers the perspectives of the adults to prevent challenges associated with \nself-care (Ghiasvand et al., 2017). One of the best discharge instructional methods is teach-back method. \nThis method refers to a communication technique used by the nurses to verify whether or not a patient \nunderstands what they are told. If the patient understands, he or she is able to accurately teach-back the \ninformation. This method is crucial in enhancing the patient understanding of post-discharge care \nrequirements (Griffey et al., 2015). Moreover, it is imperative for nurses to utilize written and visual \nmaterials to further increase patient understanding and appeal for various learning methods such as \nvisual and auditory.<\/p>\n
Data Collection Methods<\/h3>\n The data will be collected using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and \nSystems (HCAHPS) surveys. HCAHPS connotes a patient satisfaction survey recommended for all<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL 5 \nhealth care settings in America. It seeks to produce comparable data on the views of the patient on \nhealth care to facilitate objective and focused comparisons between facilities (Piper & Tallman, 2016). \nThe other method entails the use of questionnaires, which consist of a set of questions that are intended \nto obtain information from respondents. Other methods that can be used include interviews, focused \ngroups, and observations.<\/p>\n
Analysis<\/h3>\n After completing data collection, the data analysis will begin by manipulating the data in various \nways including plotting the data out and seeking correlation or developing a pivot table in Excel. The \npivot table is important in fostering sorting the data based on various variables (Grech, 2018). However, \nif the outcome of the manipulation of the data does not result in the required data, it is necessary to \ncollect more data or revise the original survey questions. Nonetheless, the original analysis of the \ncorrelations, trends, and variations is crucial in focusing the data analysis to effectively answer the \nquestion and address any objection that may arise.<\/p>\n
Expected Outcomes<\/h3>\n It has been established that patients who are discharged without proper understanding of \ndischarge instructions tend to develop significant complications. Such complications could lead to \nadverse patient outcomes such as hospital readmission, medication errors, post-operative infections, and \ninfluence of overall perception of hospital experience. Therefore, it is expected that effective methods of \nproviding discharge education such as teach-back method would address such challenges and equip the \npatients with increased knowledge on self care management.<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL 6<\/h3>\nReferences<\/h4>\n Allen, J., Hutchinson, A., Brown, R., & Livingston, P. (2014). Quality care outcomes \nfollowingtransitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: A systematic \nreview. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 346. doi: 10.1186\/1472-6963-14-346. \nGhiasvand, F., Riazi, H., Hajian, S., Kazemi, E., & Firoozi, A. (2017). The effect of a self-care program \nbased on the teach-back method on the postpartum quality of life. Electronic physician, 9(4), \n4180\u20134189. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.19082\/4180 \nGrech, V. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel\u20132: Pivot tables. Early human \ndevelopment, 117, 104-109. \nGriffey, R. T., Shin, N., Jones, S., Aginam, N., Gross, M., Kinsella, Y., Williams, J. A., Carpenter, C. \nR., Goodman, M., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2015). The impact of teach-back on comprehension of \ndischarge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A \nrandomized, controlled study. Journal of communication in healthcare, 8(1), 10\u201321. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1179\/1753807615Y.0000000001 \nHa Dinh, T. T., Bonner, A., Clark, R., Ramsbotham, J., & Hines, S. (2016). The effectiveness of the \nteach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with \nchronic disease: a systematic review.\u00a0JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation<\/p>\nNR 505 Week 7 EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nreports,\u00a014(1), 210\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11124\/jbisrir-2016-2296 \nNavanandan, N., Schmidt, S. K., Cabrera, N., DiStefano, M. C., & Mistry, R. D. (2017). The caregiver \nperspective on unscheduled 72-hour return visits to pediatric acute care sites: a focus on \ndischarge processes. Academic pediatrics, 17(7), 755-761. \nPiper, L. E., & Tallman, E. (2016). Hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems: \nAn ethical leadership dilemma to satisfy patients. The health care manager, 35(2), 151-155.<\/p>\n
EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL 7 \nWaniga, H. M., Gerke, T., Shoemaker, A., Bourgoine, D., & Eamranond, P. (2016). The impact of \nrevised discharge instructions on patient satisfaction. Journal of patient experience, 3(3), 64-68.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 7: EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE PROJECT PROPOSAL<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\nGrading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nPerformance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n100%<\/strong><\/p>\n16 points<\/strong><\/td>\nVery good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n88%<\/strong><\/p>\n14 points<\/strong><\/td>\nAcceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n81%<\/strong><\/p>\n13 points<\/strong><\/td>\nInadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n68%<\/strong><\/p>\n11 points<\/strong><\/td>\nDeficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n56%<\/strong><\/p>\n9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nFailing level<\/strong><\/p>\nof performance<\/strong><\/p>\n55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nProvides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n<\/td>\n \u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\nDemonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\nPresentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n\nApplies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n \u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nInteractive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\nInitial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nThe peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\nResponses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n <\/td>\n Demonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n\nInitial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n Responses are substantive<\/li>\n Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\nPoints deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\nThe source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\nError is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n\n7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n
\n10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\nThe following was present:<\/p>\n
\n13 – 15 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nResponses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n
\nWriting style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAND\/OR<\/p>\n