Sample Answer for NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample Included After Question<\/strong><\/em><\/h2>\nWhen politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.<\/p>\n
In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.<\/p>\n
Resources<\/strong><\/h2>\nBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
WEEKLY RESOURCES<\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nTo Prepare:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.<\/li>\n
- Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 3 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\nPost<\/strong>\u00a0a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\nRespond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.<\/p>\n*Note:<\/em><\/strong> Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a strategy for responding to an outbreak of coronavirus. It focuses on providing free coronavirus testing, paid sick leave, food assistance, and unemployment benefits in particular. Employers are required by the regulation to provide additional protection for clinical care professionals, such as personal respiratory protective devices. The bill seeks supplemental appropriations for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in order to expand food assistance and nutrition programs. Specifically, the law provides for certain waivers for school lunch programs and increases the federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid (FMAP). The legislation contributes to populace protection by strengthening emergency preparedness and public health education (Wyte-Lake et al., 2018). Effective implementation of this health policy<\/a> will require careful coordination of clinical and social interventions throughout the pandemic.<\/p>\nBackground of the Problem<\/b><\/h2>\n
The coronavirus epidemic has significant adverse effects on the global population. The respective governments ought to formulate and implement robust measures to promote disaster preparedness to counter the prevalence of infection. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act proposes a review of the national budget to increase allocations for the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and nutrition assistance grants for U.S territories. The approach is in line with the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) for the revamping healthcare sector. In addition, it denotes the commitment of the government to build a strong health system to stop, detect, and contain the spread of illnesses (Gostin, 2017). Therefore, increasing the funding for basic healthcare amenities, screening, and testing for the viruses is in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) directives for ensuring a safer world. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Evidence for the Policy<\/b><\/h2>\n
There is a lot of evidence to support the enactment of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020. <\/i>Primarily, governments across the world are initiating appropriate measures to ensure containment of the spread of the virus. Some of the key recommendations encompass proper hand hygiene, coughing and\/or sneezing in your elbow, working from home, distant learning, social distancing, and staying at least six feet away from one another. However, there are critical implications on the supply of food, drugs, and testing kits. Besides, the federal policymakers are interested in preventing any possible economic downfall. The policy is handy in supporting corporate interventions like providing paid leave for workers and personal protective equipment.<\/p>\n
The government has a fundamental responsibility for developing and maintaining healthcare infrastructure and service delivery. Nonetheless, there is always a conflict between public health objectives and industry interests (Collin et al., 2017). The legislators must strive to determine the mechanism to build consensus within and across the sectors of the economy. An integrated policy, such as the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020, <\/i>will help achieve healthcare goals. Furthermore, the legislation will be essential in promoting a synchronized medical response to the virus. It shows the need for a holistic and joint collective approach to eradicating the risk factors for the complication, as well as guaranteeing public and private sector participation in the process. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a government guideline to support the implementation of emergency interventions.<\/p>\n![\"NURS](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/NURS-6050-Discussion-1-Evidence-Base-in-Design-Sample-300x123.png\")
NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe health policy covers the broad areas of healthcare financing and the provision of appropriate clinical services like screening and testing. Also, through the policy, the government proposes to offer subsidies for nutritional and food programs to ensure social distancing and self-quarantine. The policy plays an important role in the attainment of universal healthcare coverage and public safety. Furthermore, its proper enforcement will necessitate coordination of decision planning to accomplish the global and national health goals during this pandemic.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/span> <\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nReferences<\/h2>\n
Collin, J., Hill, S. E., Kandlik Eltanani, M., Plotnikova, E., Ralston, R., & Smith, K. E. (2017). Can public health reconcile profits and pandemics? An analysis of attitudes to commercial sector engagement in health policy and research. Plos\u00a0One<\/em>, 12<\/em>(9), e0182612. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0182612<\/a><\/p>\nGostin, L. O. (2017). \u201cAmerica First\u201d: Prospects for Global Health.\u00a0The Milbank\u00a0Quarterly, 95<\/em>(2), 224\u2013228. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1111\/1468-0009.12254<\/a><\/p>\nWyte-Lake, T., Claver, M., Der-Martirosian, C., Davis, D., & Dobalian, A. (2018). Education of elderly patients about emergency preparedness by health care practitioners. American Journal of Public Heath<\/em>, 108, S207\u2013S208. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.2105\/AJPH.2018.304608<\/a><\/p>\n\n\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nWithout a doubt, COVID-19 has blurred the role in public health<\/a>. On a daily basis, whether it is through watching television, listening to the radio, or scrolling though social media, we are educated by healthcare professionals, the president, the governor, etc. on how to contain this virus – social distancing, hand hygiene, staying 6 feet away from one another, at first wearing a mask if you had a cough, but now requiring individuals to wear a mask whenever in public, no visitations in healthcare settings, and coughing\/sneezing in your elbow. Although these are all effective measures to take, there are still dilemmas in efforts to flatten the curve. This pandemic is demonstrating the consequences of underfunding public health. For example, delays in diagnostic testing and results, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and shortage of ventilators. As the federal government scrambles to rapidly boost the nation\u2019s capacity to test for the novel coronavirus, cutting red tape and leaning on the speed and technology of the private sector, new delays are developing because of a shortage of raw materials and vital items: chemical solutions, swabs and even face masks for health-care workers (The Washington Post, 2020).<\/p>\nNot as if this is new news, but healthcare professionals are being asked to reuse surgical masks, N95s, surgical caps, etc. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies), especially in areas of significant community-based transmission (CDC, 2020). This is recommended for our public, in attempts to reserve N95s and surgical masks for healthcare professionals. I believe these measures are put into place, simply because there is a mass shortage of PPE. In addition, I have seen firsthand what delays in diagnostic testing results look like. Thankfully, we have rapid testing, in which individuals receive their results within 24 – 48 hours, but prior results took 5 – 7 days to come back. Unfortunately, some samples were lost, resulting in individuals needing to be re-swapped, contributing to spreading the virus to the community.\u00a0 NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020).\u00a0Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19.<\/p>\n
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
WEEKLY RESOURCES<\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nTo Prepare:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.<\/li>\n
- Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 3 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\nPost<\/strong>\u00a0a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.<\/p>\nBy Day 6 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\nRespond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.<\/p>\n*Note:<\/em><\/strong> Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a strategy for responding to an outbreak of coronavirus. It focuses on providing free coronavirus testing, paid sick leave, food assistance, and unemployment benefits in particular. Employers are required by the regulation to provide additional protection for clinical care professionals, such as personal respiratory protective devices. The bill seeks supplemental appropriations for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in order to expand food assistance and nutrition programs. Specifically, the law provides for certain waivers for school lunch programs and increases the federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid (FMAP). The legislation contributes to populace protection by strengthening emergency preparedness and public health education (Wyte-Lake et al., 2018). Effective implementation of this health policy<\/a> will require careful coordination of clinical and social interventions throughout the pandemic.<\/p>\nBackground of the Problem<\/b><\/h2>\n
The coronavirus epidemic has significant adverse effects on the global population. The respective governments ought to formulate and implement robust measures to promote disaster preparedness to counter the prevalence of infection. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act proposes a review of the national budget to increase allocations for the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and nutrition assistance grants for U.S territories. The approach is in line with the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) for the revamping healthcare sector. In addition, it denotes the commitment of the government to build a strong health system to stop, detect, and contain the spread of illnesses (Gostin, 2017). Therefore, increasing the funding for basic healthcare amenities, screening, and testing for the viruses is in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) directives for ensuring a safer world. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Evidence for the Policy<\/b><\/h2>\n
There is a lot of evidence to support the enactment of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020. <\/i>Primarily, governments across the world are initiating appropriate measures to ensure containment of the spread of the virus. Some of the key recommendations encompass proper hand hygiene, coughing and\/or sneezing in your elbow, working from home, distant learning, social distancing, and staying at least six feet away from one another. However, there are critical implications on the supply of food, drugs, and testing kits. Besides, the federal policymakers are interested in preventing any possible economic downfall. The policy is handy in supporting corporate interventions like providing paid leave for workers and personal protective equipment.<\/p>\n
The government has a fundamental responsibility for developing and maintaining healthcare infrastructure and service delivery. Nonetheless, there is always a conflict between public health objectives and industry interests (Collin et al., 2017). The legislators must strive to determine the mechanism to build consensus within and across the sectors of the economy. An integrated policy, such as the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020, <\/i>will help achieve healthcare goals. Furthermore, the legislation will be essential in promoting a synchronized medical response to the virus. It shows the need for a holistic and joint collective approach to eradicating the risk factors for the complication, as well as guaranteeing public and private sector participation in the process. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a government guideline to support the implementation of emergency interventions.<\/p>\nNURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThe health policy covers the broad areas of healthcare financing and the provision of appropriate clinical services like screening and testing. Also, through the policy, the government proposes to offer subsidies for nutritional and food programs to ensure social distancing and self-quarantine. The policy plays an important role in the attainment of universal healthcare coverage and public safety. Furthermore, its proper enforcement will necessitate coordination of decision planning to accomplish the global and national health goals during this pandemic.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/span> <\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nReferences<\/h2>\n
Collin, J., Hill, S. E., Kandlik Eltanani, M., Plotnikova, E., Ralston, R., & Smith, K. E. (2017). Can public health reconcile profits and pandemics? An analysis of attitudes to commercial sector engagement in health policy and research. Plos\u00a0One<\/em>, 12<\/em>(9), e0182612. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0182612<\/a><\/p>\nGostin, L. O. (2017). \u201cAmerica First\u201d: Prospects for Global Health.\u00a0The Milbank\u00a0Quarterly, 95<\/em>(2), 224\u2013228. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1111\/1468-0009.12254<\/a><\/p>\nWyte-Lake, T., Claver, M., Der-Martirosian, C., Davis, D., & Dobalian, A. (2018). Education of elderly patients about emergency preparedness by health care practitioners. American Journal of Public Heath<\/em>, 108, S207\u2013S208. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.2105\/AJPH.2018.304608<\/a><\/p>\n\n\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\nWithout a doubt, COVID-19 has blurred the role in public health<\/a>. On a daily basis, whether it is through watching television, listening to the radio, or scrolling though social media, we are educated by healthcare professionals, the president, the governor, etc. on how to contain this virus – social distancing, hand hygiene, staying 6 feet away from one another, at first wearing a mask if you had a cough, but now requiring individuals to wear a mask whenever in public, no visitations in healthcare settings, and coughing\/sneezing in your elbow. Although these are all effective measures to take, there are still dilemmas in efforts to flatten the curve. This pandemic is demonstrating the consequences of underfunding public health. For example, delays in diagnostic testing and results, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and shortage of ventilators. As the federal government scrambles to rapidly boost the nation\u2019s capacity to test for the novel coronavirus, cutting red tape and leaning on the speed and technology of the private sector, new delays are developing because of a shortage of raw materials and vital items: chemical solutions, swabs and even face masks for health-care workers (The Washington Post, 2020).<\/p>\nNot as if this is new news, but healthcare professionals are being asked to reuse surgical masks, N95s, surgical caps, etc. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies), especially in areas of significant community-based transmission (CDC, 2020). This is recommended for our public, in attempts to reserve N95s and surgical masks for healthcare professionals. I believe these measures are put into place, simply because there is a mass shortage of PPE. In addition, I have seen firsthand what delays in diagnostic testing results look like. Thankfully, we have rapid testing, in which individuals receive their results within 24 – 48 hours, but prior results took 5 – 7 days to come back. Unfortunately, some samples were lost, resulting in individuals needing to be re-swapped, contributing to spreading the virus to the community.\u00a0 NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020).\u00a0Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19.<\/p>\n
- \n
- Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.<\/li>\n
- Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
By Day 3 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Post<\/strong>\u00a0a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Which social determinant most affects this policy? Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.<\/p>\n
By Day 6 of Week 7<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Respond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.<\/p>\n
*Note:<\/em><\/strong> Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a strategy for responding to an outbreak of coronavirus. It focuses on providing free coronavirus testing, paid sick leave, food assistance, and unemployment benefits in particular. Employers are required by the regulation to provide additional protection for clinical care professionals, such as personal respiratory protective devices. The bill seeks supplemental appropriations for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) in order to expand food assistance and nutrition programs. Specifically, the law provides for certain waivers for school lunch programs and increases the federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid (FMAP). The legislation contributes to populace protection by strengthening emergency preparedness and public health education (Wyte-Lake et al., 2018). Effective implementation of this health policy<\/a> will require careful coordination of clinical and social interventions throughout the pandemic.<\/p>\n
Background of the Problem<\/b><\/h2>\n
The coronavirus epidemic has significant adverse effects on the global population. The respective governments ought to formulate and implement robust measures to promote disaster preparedness to counter the prevalence of infection. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act proposes a review of the national budget to increase allocations for the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and nutrition assistance grants for U.S territories. The approach is in line with the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) for the revamping healthcare sector. In addition, it denotes the commitment of the government to build a strong health system to stop, detect, and contain the spread of illnesses (Gostin, 2017). Therefore, increasing the funding for basic healthcare amenities, screening, and testing for the viruses is in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) directives for ensuring a safer world. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Evidence for the Policy<\/b><\/h2>\n
There is a lot of evidence to support the enactment of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020. <\/i>Primarily, governments across the world are initiating appropriate measures to ensure containment of the spread of the virus. Some of the key recommendations encompass proper hand hygiene, coughing and\/or sneezing in your elbow, working from home, distant learning, social distancing, and staying at least six feet away from one another. However, there are critical implications on the supply of food, drugs, and testing kits. Besides, the federal policymakers are interested in preventing any possible economic downfall. The policy is handy in supporting corporate interventions like providing paid leave for workers and personal protective equipment.<\/p>\n
The government has a fundamental responsibility for developing and maintaining healthcare infrastructure and service delivery. Nonetheless, there is always a conflict between public health objectives and industry interests (Collin et al., 2017). The legislators must strive to determine the mechanism to build consensus within and across the sectors of the economy. An integrated policy, such as the Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020, <\/i>will help achieve healthcare goals. Furthermore, the legislation will be essential in promoting a synchronized medical response to the virus. It shows the need for a holistic and joint collective approach to eradicating the risk factors for the complication, as well as guaranteeing public and private sector participation in the process. NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
Families First Coronavirus Response Act 2020 is a government guideline to support the implementation of emergency interventions.<\/p>\n
NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n The health policy covers the broad areas of healthcare financing and the provision of appropriate clinical services like screening and testing. Also, through the policy, the government proposes to offer subsidies for nutritional and food programs to ensure social distancing and self-quarantine. The policy plays an important role in the attainment of universal healthcare coverage and public safety. Furthermore, its proper enforcement will necessitate coordination of decision planning to accomplish the global and national health goals during this pandemic.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/span> <\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Collin, J., Hill, S. E., Kandlik Eltanani, M., Plotnikova, E., Ralston, R., & Smith, K. E. (2017). Can public health reconcile profits and pandemics? An analysis of attitudes to commercial sector engagement in health policy and research. Plos\u00a0One<\/em>, 12<\/em>(9), e0182612. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0182612<\/a><\/p>\n
Gostin, L. O. (2017). \u201cAmerica First\u201d: Prospects for Global Health.\u00a0The Milbank\u00a0Quarterly, 95<\/em>(2), 224\u2013228. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.1111\/1468-0009.12254<\/a><\/p>\n
Wyte-Lake, T., Claver, M., Der-Martirosian, C., Davis, D., & Dobalian, A. (2018). Education of elderly patients about emergency preparedness by health care practitioners. American Journal of Public Heath<\/em>, 108, S207\u2013S208. https:\/\/doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org\/10.2105\/AJPH.2018.304608<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design Sample<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Without a doubt, COVID-19 has blurred the role in public health<\/a>. On a daily basis, whether it is through watching television, listening to the radio, or scrolling though social media, we are educated by healthcare professionals, the president, the governor, etc. on how to contain this virus – social distancing, hand hygiene, staying 6 feet away from one another, at first wearing a mask if you had a cough, but now requiring individuals to wear a mask whenever in public, no visitations in healthcare settings, and coughing\/sneezing in your elbow. Although these are all effective measures to take, there are still dilemmas in efforts to flatten the curve. This pandemic is demonstrating the consequences of underfunding public health. For example, delays in diagnostic testing and results, shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE), and shortage of ventilators. As the federal government scrambles to rapidly boost the nation\u2019s capacity to test for the novel coronavirus, cutting red tape and leaning on the speed and technology of the private sector, new delays are developing because of a shortage of raw materials and vital items: chemical solutions, swabs and even face masks for health-care workers (The Washington Post, 2020).<\/p>\n
Not as if this is new news, but healthcare professionals are being asked to reuse surgical masks, N95s, surgical caps, etc. Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is recommending wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies), especially in areas of significant community-based transmission (CDC, 2020). This is recommended for our public, in attempts to reserve N95s and surgical masks for healthcare professionals. I believe these measures are put into place, simply because there is a mass shortage of PPE. In addition, I have seen firsthand what delays in diagnostic testing results look like. Thankfully, we have rapid testing, in which individuals receive their results within 24 – 48 hours, but prior results took 5 – 7 days to come back. Unfortunately, some samples were lost, resulting in individuals needing to be re-swapped, contributing to spreading the virus to the community.\u00a0 NURS 6050 Discussion 1 Evidence Base in Design<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020).\u00a0Use of Cloth Face Coverings to Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19.<\/p>\n