Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":18429,"date":"2023-02-20T13:52:21","date_gmt":"2023-02-20T13:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/?p=18429"},"modified":"2023-09-09T13:33:46","modified_gmt":"2023-09-09T13:33:46","slug":"nr-439-week-6-assignment-research-article-review-guidelines-purpose-recent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/nr-439-week-6-assignment-research-article-review-guidelines-purpose-recent\/","title":{"rendered":"NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent"},"content":{"rendered":"

NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/h2>\n

NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent<\/h3>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose<\/h3>\n

The purpose of this Assignment is for the student to learn to assimilate, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article.
\nStudent is to select a report of a single, original study that has been published within the last five years from the CCN Library. Course Outcomes Through this Assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:
\nCO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice<\/a>.
\n(PO #7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (
\nPOs #4 and 8)
\nCO4: valuate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice.
\n(POs #4 and 8)
\nCO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice.
\n(POs #7 and 8)
\nPoints
\nThe Assignment is worth a total of 200 points.
\nDue Date
\nYou are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Research Article Review Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.<\/p>\n

Requirements<\/h3>\n

Through this Assignment, the student will:
\nConduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find research-based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 1); Student is to use the CCN library for search.
\nCritique a peer-reviewed study, indicating the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each (CO 2, CO 4,)<\/p>\n

Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. (CO 3).<\/h3>\n

Please remember this Assignment can be sent to TurnitinWeek One draft box for review. If you wait until late Sunday night to submit, you may not receive your feedback in time if you need to make changes. Final submission must be in the Week 6 AssignmentDropbox and student will not receive Turnitin results. Please read the announcement on the Turnitin information.
\nArticle must be from CCN Library and student is required to document working permalink to article.
\nPreparing the Paper
\nConduct a PICO(T) search on the nursing problem that you identified in Week 2, Discussion questions. Select one most recent peer-reviewed study that describes original research in a single study.
\nAnalyze the article and provide the following information in brief format: research question the study; type of sample and number of participants; research design of the study, findings of the study; and limitations of the study. Summarize the importance to nursing.
\nThe estimated length of this paper is four (4) pages, excluding the title page and References page. Summarize the results of the study as outlined below:<\/p>\n

Write a brief introduction to your paper, however do not label it as an \u201cIntroduction\u201d in accordance with the rules of APA scholarly writing.<\/p>\n

State the research question for this study in a paragraph.<\/h3>\n

Describe the research design of this study.
\nExplain how the sample was selected and include the number of participants. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate, and defend your answer why or why not.
\nDescribe the data collection method(s) including who collected data, what tools were used, and other pertinent information.
\nIdentify the limitations of the study, and describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies.
\nDescribe the findings reported in the study. What is the answer to the research question based on these findings? If the study fails to answer the research question, what do you believe is the reason?
\nSummarize the article. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice? Please provide the rationale for your answer.
\nList your references, formatted in APA style, On the References page. Guidelines and a sample paper on APA may be found under Course Home in the Course Resources link. Follow the guidelines for writing professional papers using APA formatting as described in the 6th edition of the manual.<\/p>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\"NR
NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

NR 439 Week 6 Assignment Research Article Review Guidelines Purpose Recent\u00a0 Grading Rubric<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Performance Category<\/strong><\/td>\n100% or highest level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

100%<\/strong><\/p>\n

16 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Very good or high level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

88%<\/strong><\/p>\n

14 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Acceptable level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

81%<\/strong><\/p>\n

13 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Inadequate demonstration of expectations<\/strong><\/p>\n

68%<\/strong><\/p>\n

11 points<\/strong><\/td>\n

Deficient level of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

56%<\/strong><\/p>\n

9 points<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n

Failing level<\/strong><\/p>\n

of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n

55% or less<\/strong><\/p>\n

0 points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n

\u00a0Total Points Possible= 50 <\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 16 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 14 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n13 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 0 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Scholarliness<\/strong><\/p>\n

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.<\/td>\n

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> or more<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).<\/li>\n
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.<\/li>\n
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*<\/li>\n
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\n\u00a016 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a014 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a013 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n11 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Application of Course Knowledge<\/strong><\/p>\n

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations<\/strong><\/td>\n

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one <\/strong>of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two<\/strong> of the following elements:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three<\/strong> of the following elements<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.<\/li>\n
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.<\/li>\n
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a010 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n9 Points <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Interactive Dialogue <\/strong><\/p>\n

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\n

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.<\/strong><\/td>\n

Demonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 3 of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrated 2 of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.<\/li>\n
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.<\/li>\n
  • Responses are substantive<\/li>\n
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n8 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n7 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a06 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a00 Points<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Grammar, Syntax, APA <\/strong><\/p>\n

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition<\/strong><\/p>\n

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.<\/strong><\/td>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 0-3 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 4-6 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 7-9 errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • 10- 12 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
 <\/p>\n

The following was present:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        AND\/OR<\/p>\n

          \n
        • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
The following was present:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    AND\/OR<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      AND\/OR<\/p>\n

        \n
      • Writing style does not facilitate communication<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n0 Points Deducted<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n5 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Participation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Requirements <\/strong><\/td>\n

Demonstrated the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n
<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nFailed to demonstrate the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n0 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n5 Points Lost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Due Date Requirements<\/strong><\/td>\nDemonstrated all <\/strong>of the following:<\/p>\n
    \n
  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. <\/strong><\/td>\n

<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nDemonstrates one<\/strong> or less<\/strong> of the following.<\/p>\n